Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    'Safe' cars for women won't go down the tube

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-23 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's note: The decision of local authorities in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong province, to run some women-only coaches on several metro lines as a pilot project has sparked a public debate. Three scholars share their views with China Daily's Wu Zheyu on the issue. Excerpts follow:

    Welcome move in the right direction

    Li Yinhe, research fellow at the Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences [Photo/China Daily]

    People should realize the intention behind the proposal is good-to help women avoid some of the rough and tumble of commuting by public transport and protecting them from sexual harassment. Thus the move is neither gender-biased nor an attempt to separate men and women.

    History has many examples of segregation, such as racial segregation. In the US, for example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott started on Dec 5, 1955, four days after Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was arrested for refusing to yield her seat to a white man on a Montgomery bus. The boycott that lasted more than a year ultimately forced the US Supreme Court to declare the segregated seating unconstitutional and order Montgomery to integrate its bus system. But the Shenzhen metro pilot program cannot and should not be compared with racial segregation.

    Radical feminists may still criticize the move, saying it could worsen the gender disparity. Average or radical, all feminists pursue equal rights for women. The difference is that moderate feminists accept there exists a gap between men and women in terms of physical strength while radical ones refuse to recognize any difference between them.

    I disagree with radical feminists. Only if we accept the difference between genders can we chart the course for pursuing equal rights. The National People's Congress, for instance, has a minimum ratio for female deputies-at least 20 percent of the total number-which is a good way of protecting women's political rights. In the absence of the minimum ratio, the number of female deputies could drop drastically.

    The fact is, women are the disadvantaged lot in crowded buses and metros, and many of them become victims of sexual harassment. In this regard, the pilot offering women special cars in metros is a move toward narrowing the gender gap. A survey can show the acceptability level of the pilot project as well as expose the loopholes in it, which can then be plugged.

    1 2 3 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产精品热久久无码av| 日韩中文字幕一区| 日本三级在线中文字幕在线|中文| 在线高清无码A.| 大桥久未无码吹潮在线观看| 亚洲AV无码不卡在线观看下载| 日韩av无码中文无码电影| 最近2019中文免费字幕在线观看 | 中文字幕丰满伦子无码| 亚洲不卡中文字幕无码| 国产∨亚洲V天堂无码久久久| 亚洲人成无码网站在线观看| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久| 99久久人妻无码精品系列蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品无码久久SM| 日韩久久久久中文字幕人妻| 国产成人一区二区三中文| 国产强伦姧在线观看无码| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 亚洲精品无码AV人在线播放| 国产成人无码AV一区二区| 最近中文字幕电影大全免费版| 中文字幕无码精品亚洲资源网久久| 国产在线无码一区二区三区视频 | 寂寞少妇做spa按摩无码| а天堂中文在线官网| 最近的中文字幕在线看视频 | 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码喷水 | 日韩专区无码人妻| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 精品久久久无码中文字幕 | 亚洲成A∨人片天堂网无码| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲精品无码AV人在线播放| 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕| 久久中文娱乐网| 精品久久久久久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线看| 中文无码人妻有码人妻中文字幕 | 在线观看中文字幕|