Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    'Safe' cars for women won't go down the tube

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-23 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's note: The decision of local authorities in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong province, to run some women-only coaches on several metro lines as a pilot project has sparked a public debate. Three scholars share their views with China Daily's Wu Zheyu on the issue. Excerpts follow:

    Welcome move in the right direction

    Li Yinhe, research fellow at the Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences [Photo/China Daily]

    People should realize the intention behind the proposal is good-to help women avoid some of the rough and tumble of commuting by public transport and protecting them from sexual harassment. Thus the move is neither gender-biased nor an attempt to separate men and women.

    History has many examples of segregation, such as racial segregation. In the US, for example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott started on Dec 5, 1955, four days after Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was arrested for refusing to yield her seat to a white man on a Montgomery bus. The boycott that lasted more than a year ultimately forced the US Supreme Court to declare the segregated seating unconstitutional and order Montgomery to integrate its bus system. But the Shenzhen metro pilot program cannot and should not be compared with racial segregation.

    Radical feminists may still criticize the move, saying it could worsen the gender disparity. Average or radical, all feminists pursue equal rights for women. The difference is that moderate feminists accept there exists a gap between men and women in terms of physical strength while radical ones refuse to recognize any difference between them.

    I disagree with radical feminists. Only if we accept the difference between genders can we chart the course for pursuing equal rights. The National People's Congress, for instance, has a minimum ratio for female deputies-at least 20 percent of the total number-which is a good way of protecting women's political rights. In the absence of the minimum ratio, the number of female deputies could drop drastically.

    The fact is, women are the disadvantaged lot in crowded buses and metros, and many of them become victims of sexual harassment. In this regard, the pilot offering women special cars in metros is a move toward narrowing the gender gap. A survey can show the acceptability level of the pilot project as well as expose the loopholes in it, which can then be plugged.

    1 2 3 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    永久免费无码网站在线观看个| 免费无码毛片一区二区APP| 国产精品无码专区| 无码av高潮喷水无码专区线| 久久av高潮av无码av喷吹| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 日韩精品无码熟人妻视频| 国产成人无码AV一区二区在线观看| 亚洲色中文字幕无码AV| 88久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 亚洲一区无码中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕久久| 自拍中文精品无码| 岛国av无码免费无禁网| 国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件| 无码专区永久免费AV网站| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久| 中文成人无码精品久久久不卡| 最近最新免费中文字幕高清| 最近2019中文字幕免费大全5| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文福利| 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区| 下载天堂国产AV成人无码精品网站| av潮喷大喷水系列无码| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 亚洲va无码手机在线电影| 中文精品无码中文字幕无码专区| 韩国19禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99性 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99性| 亚洲中文字幕丝袜制服一区| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 人妻无码一区二区三区AV| 国产V片在线播放免费无码| 亚洲 欧美 国产 日韩 中文字幕 | 中文字幕精品一区|