Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    'Safe' cars for women won't go down the tube

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-23 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's note: The decision of local authorities in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong province, to run some women-only coaches on several metro lines as a pilot project has sparked a public debate. Three scholars share their views with China Daily's Wu Zheyu on the issue. Excerpts follow:

    Welcome move in the right direction

    Li Yinhe, research fellow at the Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences [Photo/China Daily]

    People should realize the intention behind the proposal is good-to help women avoid some of the rough and tumble of commuting by public transport and protecting them from sexual harassment. Thus the move is neither gender-biased nor an attempt to separate men and women.

    History has many examples of segregation, such as racial segregation. In the US, for example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott started on Dec 5, 1955, four days after Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was arrested for refusing to yield her seat to a white man on a Montgomery bus. The boycott that lasted more than a year ultimately forced the US Supreme Court to declare the segregated seating unconstitutional and order Montgomery to integrate its bus system. But the Shenzhen metro pilot program cannot and should not be compared with racial segregation.

    Radical feminists may still criticize the move, saying it could worsen the gender disparity. Average or radical, all feminists pursue equal rights for women. The difference is that moderate feminists accept there exists a gap between men and women in terms of physical strength while radical ones refuse to recognize any difference between them.

    I disagree with radical feminists. Only if we accept the difference between genders can we chart the course for pursuing equal rights. The National People's Congress, for instance, has a minimum ratio for female deputies-at least 20 percent of the total number-which is a good way of protecting women's political rights. In the absence of the minimum ratio, the number of female deputies could drop drastically.

    The fact is, women are the disadvantaged lot in crowded buses and metros, and many of them become victims of sexual harassment. In this regard, the pilot offering women special cars in metros is a move toward narrowing the gender gap. A survey can show the acceptability level of the pilot project as well as expose the loopholes in it, which can then be plugged.

    1 2 3 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲国产精彩中文乱码AV| 超清无码无卡中文字幕| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区国产| 免费中文字幕视频| 蜜臀AV无码国产精品色午夜麻豆| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 中文无码熟妇人妻AV在线 | 精品久久久久中文字| 久久久久成人精品无码| 亚洲AV日韩AV高潮无码专区| 最近免费视频中文字幕大全| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦下载| 中文字幕在线视频网| 日本阿v视频高清在线中文| 91久久九九无码成人网站| 无码国产精品一区二区免费vr | 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡| 欧美巨大xxxx做受中文字幕| 久久影院午夜理论片无码| 免费精品无码AV片在线观看| 国产在线拍偷自揄拍无码| 线中文在线资源 官网| 日本成人中文字幕| 中文人妻av高清一区二区| 亚洲精品人成无码中文毛片| 日韩少妇无码喷潮系列一二三 | 国产精品无码无片在线观看| 无码GOGO大胆啪啪艺术| 无套中出丰满人妻无码| 亚欧免费无码aⅴ在线观看| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码人妻| 免费无码国产欧美久久18| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 线中文在线资源 官网| 国产综合无码一区二区辣椒| 永久免费AV无码网站国产| 亚洲精品~无码抽插| 少妇无码一区二区三区免费| 国产亚洲精品a在线无码| 久久精品无码av|