Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    'Safe' cars for women won't go down the tube

    China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-23 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's note: The decision of local authorities in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong province, to run some women-only coaches on several metro lines as a pilot project has sparked a public debate. Three scholars share their views with China Daily's Wu Zheyu on the issue. Excerpts follow:

    Welcome move in the right direction

    Li Yinhe, research fellow at the Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences [Photo/China Daily]

    People should realize the intention behind the proposal is good-to help women avoid some of the rough and tumble of commuting by public transport and protecting them from sexual harassment. Thus the move is neither gender-biased nor an attempt to separate men and women.

    History has many examples of segregation, such as racial segregation. In the US, for example, the Montgomery Bus Boycott started on Dec 5, 1955, four days after Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was arrested for refusing to yield her seat to a white man on a Montgomery bus. The boycott that lasted more than a year ultimately forced the US Supreme Court to declare the segregated seating unconstitutional and order Montgomery to integrate its bus system. But the Shenzhen metro pilot program cannot and should not be compared with racial segregation.

    Radical feminists may still criticize the move, saying it could worsen the gender disparity. Average or radical, all feminists pursue equal rights for women. The difference is that moderate feminists accept there exists a gap between men and women in terms of physical strength while radical ones refuse to recognize any difference between them.

    I disagree with radical feminists. Only if we accept the difference between genders can we chart the course for pursuing equal rights. The National People's Congress, for instance, has a minimum ratio for female deputies-at least 20 percent of the total number-which is a good way of protecting women's political rights. In the absence of the minimum ratio, the number of female deputies could drop drastically.

    The fact is, women are the disadvantaged lot in crowded buses and metros, and many of them become victims of sexual harassment. In this regard, the pilot offering women special cars in metros is a move toward narrowing the gender gap. A survey can show the acceptability level of the pilot project as well as expose the loopholes in it, which can then be plugged.

    1 2 3 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕在线免费看线人| 日韩av无码久久精品免费| 久久久久久国产精品无码超碰| 最近2019中文免费字幕在线观看 | 成在人线AV无码免观看麻豆| 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕 | 亚洲最大av无码网址| 亚洲V无码一区二区三区四区观看 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区三区 亚洲爆乳无码一区二区三区 | 日本按摩高潮a级中文片| 国产成人精品无码播放| 中国无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪软件| 无码中文av有码中文a| 亚洲高清无码在线观看| 成人无码区在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区不卡| 亚洲啪啪AV无码片| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码| 中文字幕在线视频网| 中文字幕久久精品无码| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 国产精品无码专区在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区东京热| 最近最新中文字幕视频| 大地资源中文第三页| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口 | 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕综合| 中文字幕无码无码专区| 人妻系列无码专区久久五月天| gogo少妇无码肉肉视频| 人妻丰满熟妇无码区免费 | 久久亚洲AV永久无码精品| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码| 人妻精品久久无码区| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看| 久久Av无码精品人妻系列| 免费A级毛片无码视频| 久久精品无码一区二区无码| 国产高新无码在线观看| 国产成人无码免费看片软件| 中文字幕无码一区二区三区本日| 曰韩无码AV片免费播放不卡|