Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

    By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

    Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

    Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

    The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

    The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

    The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

    From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

    Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

    Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

    1 2 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    精品久久久久久无码人妻蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品无码久久青草| 亚洲AV蜜桃永久无码精品| 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视| 人妻丰满?V无码久久不卡| 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影| 精品久久久无码人妻中文字幕豆芽 | 最近中文2019字幕第二页| 亚洲AV无码成H人在线观看 | 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院导航| 亚洲精品无码久久久久AV麻豆| 亚洲Av永久无码精品三区在线| 日韩国产中文字幕| 无码国内精品久久人妻麻豆按摩| 色综合久久无码中文字幕| 免费a级毛片无码a∨免费软件 | 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 成人午夜福利免费无码视频| 亚洲精品午夜无码电影网| 中文亚洲日韩欧美| 日本欧美亚洲中文| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区 | 国产成人无码免费看片软件| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区在线观看 | 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看| 无码专区久久综合久中文字幕| YY111111少妇无码理论片| 欧洲精品久久久av无码电影 | 日韩精品无码一区二区三区免费| 国产台湾无码AV片在线观看| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| 国产一区三区二区中文在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美另类视频| 日本中文字幕一区二区有码在线| 中文无码vs无码人妻| 亚洲综合中文字幕无线码| 亚洲一级Av无码毛片久久精品| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕| 免费无码中文字幕A级毛片| 欧美中文在线视频|