Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Shared bikes should also be safe bikes

    By Cui Shoufeng | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-02 06:54
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    SHI YU/CHINA DAILY

    Editor's Note: The parents of an 11-year-old boy, who was killed in a collision with a coach while riding one of Ofo's shared bikes in Shanghai in March, have sued the company and the coach driver, demanding 8.78 million yuan ($1.32 million) in compensation. They also want Ofo to replace its bike locks with smarter ones. Two experts share their views with China Daily's Cui Shoufeng. Excerpts follow:

    Smarter locks cannot rule out accidents

    Judging by the evidence available, the legal guardians of the 11-year-old, including his parents and school, should be primarily responsible for his death. Children of his age are deemed to have limited capacity for civil conduct and, hence, their civil actions should have the consent of or be ratified by their guardians. Besides, Chinese law prohibits children below 12 from riding bikes on public roads.

    The coach driver's responsibility is comparatively less as the boy "stole" the bike by cracking the combination code to its lock and was riding on the wrong side of the road when the bus hit him.

    The question then is: How much responsibility the bike-sharing company should shoulder?

    The locks of many Ofo bikes are not difficult to open, because their four-digit combination code does not change after use and can be easily obtained. Perhaps that's why Ofo has been updating the old mechanical locks since March. The new, smart locks are harder to crack, but they have not yet been fitted to all Ofo bikes.

    From the legal point of view, however, Ofo cannot be held responsible for the accident. And whether or not it has violated tort law should be decided by the cause of the boy's death. But if the locks of all Ofo bikes have design flaws and the boy cracked the combination code on one of them, Ofo should be held accountable.

    Ofo might be exempted from blame, however, if it is established that the boy found the bike unlocked, because the violation of tort law consists of illegal acts and intentional mistakes. The company has moral and technological obligations, though, to update its products and pay compensation to the boy's parents. But accidents like this are not always foreseeable and cannot be avoided even after Ofo equips all its bikes with smarter locks.

    Zhu Wei, deputy director of the Communication Law Center at China University of Political Science and Law

    1 2 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲无码在线播放| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线观看| 久热中文字幕无码视频| 午夜无码伦费影视在线观看| 亚洲AV中文无码字幕色三| 国产精品无码无卡在线播放| 久久无码AV一区二区三区| 色噜噜狠狠成人中文综合| A级毛片无码久久精品免费| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 波多野结衣在线中文| 无码专区国产无套粉嫩白浆内射| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品| 久久无码中文字幕东京热| 久久e热在这里只有国产中文精品99| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 99久久中文字幕| 中文在线中文A| 亚洲v国产v天堂a无码久久| yy111111少妇无码影院| 小13箩利洗澡无码视频网站| 亚洲精品~无码抽插| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区 | 久久久无码人妻精品无码| 日韩精品无码视频一区二区蜜桃 | 无码超乳爆乳中文字幕久久| 中文 在线 日韩 亚洲 欧美| 国产精品无码国模私拍视频| a最新无码国产在线视频| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 无码av免费网站| 玖玖资源站无码专区| 国产高清无码毛片| gogo少妇无码肉肉视频| 日韩A无码AV一区二区三区| 日韩精品无码人妻一区二区三区| 免费a级毛片无码免费视频| 毛片一区二区三区无码|