Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    'America First' trade rows about to begin

    By Dan Steinbock | China Daily | Updated: 2017-08-04 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    MA XUEJING/CHINA DAILY

    The first China-US Comprehensive Economic Dialogue in Washington concluded on July 19, without a joint news conferences, joint statement or new announcements on market access by the United States to China or vice-versa, prompting many to assume the CED has paved the way to a major trade conflict between the two countries.

    But despite tough political rhetoric, economic realities do not seem to support such a view.

    A more nuanced scenario is that, while the Donald Trump administration was willing to penalize the Sino-US economic dialogue over slow progress in deficit reduction and perhaps the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's geopolitics, it also wanted to use the CED as a "demonstration effect" in the impending North America Free Trade Agreement talks and trade reviews-to signal determination.

    In fact, the shadows over the CED emerged a while ago. After Trump met with President Xi Jinping in early April, the two sides announced a 100-Day Action Plan to improve bilateral trade ties. Yet only two weeks later, Trump issued a presidential memorandum, directing Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross to investigate the effects of steel imports on the US' national security on the basis of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

    After returning from his visit to France last month, Trump ramped up the heat. "They're dumping steel and destroying our steel industry," he said on the eve of the CED. "They've been doing it for decades, and I'm stopping it. There are two ways: quotas and tariffs. Maybe I'll do both."

    While China's ambassador to the US Cui Tiankai warned Washington of "troubling developments" that could derail the bilateral relationship, Ross raised the heat by saying he would present Trump a range of options to restrict steel imports on national security grounds.

    Significantly, steel imports as a national security threat was not presented only as a Sino-US issue but also as a multilateral challenge.

    As steel imports suddenly became a "national security" issue for the US, Secretary of Defense James Mattis was dragged into the debacle. By mid-June, Europe's NATO leaders had already launched an extraordinary lobbying campaign against an anticipated US crackdown on steel imports, which, they said, would hit US allies more than China. Consequently, Mattis, not Commerce Secretary Ross, has been hearing the cases of apprehensive German and Dutch NATO leaders and passing on their concerns to the White House.

    In the White House, the issue reignited the old divide between trade hawks-including Trump's trade and industrial policy head Peter Navarro; trade representative Robert Lighthizer; and trade advisor Dan DiMicco, who is former CEO of US steel giant Nucorwho are pushing for high import tariffs, and the more business-friendly former Goldman Sachs executives-Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin and National Economic Council chief Gary Cohn-who argue for restraint.

    Washington's European NATO allies do not buy the national security argument. Some EU leaders are even ready for retaliation if Trump decides to walk the talk.

    On the other hand, the US' NAFTA partners have been monitoring the debacle closely. If the Trump administration plans to use steel as a national security threat, Canada and Mexico know full well the focus will also be on NAFTA rather than just China or Germany.

    China produces almost half of the world's steel, but its US market share in steel is marginal-less than 2 percent. The largest steel exporters to the US include Washington's NAFTA partners Canada (almost 17 percent) and Mexico (about 9 percent), East Asian giants the Republic of Korea (12 percent) and Japan (nearly 7 percent), as well as Brazil, Turkey, Russia, Germany, Taiwan, Vietnam-and then the Chinese mainland.

    So if Trump really is "hell-bent on imposing" major tariffs on steel, it is the US' NAFTA partners that will be the first to feel the heat. But if Trump moves further to imported aluminum, semiconductors, paper, household appliances, that's when China and other major exporters to the US will become targets as well.

    1 2 Next   >>|
    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩久久无码免费毛片软件| 中文字幕日韩人妻不卡一区| 亚洲欧美日韩另类中文字幕组| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站| 欧美日韩中文在线| av潮喷大喷水系列无码| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊 | 人妻少妇久久中文字幕一区二区| 无码人妻一区二区三区兔费| 久久久久精品国产亚洲AV无码| 中文亚洲AV片在线观看不卡| 久久久91人妻无码精品蜜桃HD| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 亚洲成AV人在线观看天堂无码 | 午夜无码中文字幕在线播放 | 中文字幕精品视频| 中文字幕在线无码一区| AV无码精品一区二区三区| 无码伊人66久久大杳蕉网站谷歌| 久久AV高潮AV无码AV| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 最近中文字幕mv免费高清视频8| 亚洲中文字幕一二三四区苍井空| 精品无码久久久久久久久久 | 最近中文字幕完整版资源| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 无码国内精品久久人妻麻豆按摩| 国产成人无码精品久久久久免费| 成人无码视频97免费| 国产拍拍拍无码视频免费| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕一区| 亚洲av无码国产精品色午夜字幕 | 人妻一区二区三区无码精品一区 | 久久伊人中文无码| 亚洲?V无码乱码国产精品| 亚洲精品无码99在线观看| 亚洲无码视频在线| 天堂中文在线最新版| 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇| 天堂√中文最新版在线下载| 最近完整中文字幕2019电影|