Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    USA

    Are big storms proof of climate change? Maybe not

    China Daily USA | Updated: 2017-09-18 10:18
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    Why me? is the question victims of Nature's random fury naturally ask.

    With vast stretches of the southern US still reeling from the devastation brought by two monster storms, an editorial in the medical journal The Lancet helps put things in perspective, and raise a few profound questions.

    Over the past few weeks, the volume of rain and floods - not just in Houston but across the globe - has been "unprecedented" and "difficult to comprehend", Lancet editors write.

    In Asia, more than 1,400 people are dead and tens of millions awash in extreme monsoon rains. A third of Bangladesh is submerged with its worst flooding in 100 years. Half a million people in Nepal have had their food sources threatened by flood waters.

    In late August, Typhoon Hato, the strongest storm in the region in 50 years, pummeled the Philippines and Macao and in Sierra Leone, West Africa, 499 people were buried alive in mudslides triggered by torrential rains.

    Hurricane Harvey was Houston's third 500-year flood in three years. One study predicts that by the end of the century, climate-related deaths will rise from the current level of 3,000 to 152,000 annually.

    And as southern Florida emerges from the wrath of Hurricane Irma, it comes as little surprise to hear that Miami's mayor says this might be a good time to talk about climate change.

    But not so fast. Nancy Selover, a professor at Arizona State University's School of Geographical Sciences and a self-professed big believer in global warming, thinks the trio of Harvey, Irma and Jose are really just a terrible and unfortunate and "rare coincidence".

    "I don't think this is a result of global warming, as we have had many storms more powerful than these prior to 1960, including many Category 5 and 4 stowrms," she said.

    Irma's 185 mph winds dropped to a Category 4 before making landfall. The 1935 Florida Keys "Labor Day" hurricane hit land as a Category 5, as did Andrew when it slammed into Dade County, Florida, in 1992.

    The record holders for sustained winds, by the way, are in the Pacific - 1961's Typhoon Nancy and 2015's Hurricane Patricia - both clocked in at 215 mph. Irma could have set the record for the Atlantic, once all the data are analyzed.

    The tendency, Selover explained, is to focus on more recent storms as being worse than historical ones because we have such better coverage of them and, unfortunately in many cases, more people in their paths. The chances of a hurricane hitting the southeastern United States are the same now as they were 100 years ago, she said.

    Climatologist Randy Cerveny, who works with the United Nations-related World Meteorological Organization, said the trifecta of Harvey, Irma and Jose is not that unusual.

    "This is the normal time (early-mid September) that we have the peak of the Atlantic hurricane season," he said. He also mentioned that the trio is a demonstration of their improved long-range prediction methods, which had forecast that this would be an above-average season.

    Cerveny said that some theoretical research suggests that with global warming, hurricanes my increase in size and intensity, "but there is still much debate about that in the scientific community." And in general hotter climates produce more evaporation and thus more rainfall, but Harvey's inundation of Houston was primarily because a giant high ridge of pressure in the southwest stalled the storm over the Gulf Coast.

    He said it was difficult to attribute one storm's impact to climate change. It's just as "absurd" to say that one hurricane in summer confirms global warming theory, as it is to say that one snowstorm in winter contradicts man-made global warming.

    "Climate is 'long-term' while meteorology is 'short-term,'" he said.

    Selover had a great answer when a reporter asked her what preventative measures we as a society can do to ensure the longevity of our planet.

    She said it was "an impossible question to answer as the planet will be fine regardless of what we do".

    "The longevity of ourselves and the ecosystems are of more concern. The Earth has changed drastically over hundreds of millions of years and will continue to do so, with or without us."

    Contact the writer at chrisdavis@chinadailyusa.com.

    (China Daily USA 09/18/2017 page2)

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲AV无码一区二区三区国产| 高清无码中文字幕在线观看视频| 中文字幕专区高清在线观看 | 色综合久久中文字幕无码| 久久受www免费人成_看片中文| 无码人妻视频一区二区三区| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 最近高清中文字幕无吗免费看| 久久亚洲AV成人无码国产| 国产成人麻豆亚洲综合无码精品| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽ | 无码国产精品一区二区免费16 | 99精品人妻无码专区在线视频区| 亚洲中文字幕无码日韩| 久久无码精品一区二区三区| 少妇人妻偷人精品无码视频 | 无码午夜成人1000部免费视频| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文视频| 免费A级毛片无码A∨中文字幕下载| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区蜜桃 | av潮喷大喷水系列无码| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区DV| 国产成人精品一区二区三区无码| 国产一区三区二区中文在线| 日韩国产中文字幕| 人妻丝袜中文无码av影音先锋专区 | 国产成人无码a区在线视频| 色欲A∨无码蜜臀AV免费播| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚| 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 亚洲中文久久精品无码| 一区二区三区人妻无码| 国产色综合久久无码有码| 在人线AV无码免费高潮喷水| 国产品无码一区二区三区在线蜜桃| 日日日日做夜夜夜夜无码| 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 波多野结衣AV无码久久一区| 亚洲AV无码不卡在线播放|