Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Europe

    Uber spat a bump in road for 'gig' economy

    By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-09-29 09:04
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    Regulators will always be needed to make sure consumers and workers do not suffer unintended consequences

    The seemingly inexorable advance of the so-called "gig" economy hit a minor bump in the road this month when taxi-hailing company Uber lost its license to operate in London, one of its biggest markets.

    Transport for London, the industry regulator in the British capital, said a number of negative factors, including Uber's failure to make adequate background checks on drivers, meant it was not a fit and proper company to hold a private vehicle hire license.

    No doubt in the hope of resolving the spat with the regulator, Dara Khosrowshahi, the new CEO of the California-based company, opted for contrition. In an internal memo to employees, he acknowledged "there is a high cost to a bad reputation".

    "It's critical that we act with integrity in everything we do," he wrote. "And learn how to be a better partner to every city we operate in."

    That is already a bit of a climbdown for the representative of one of the main Silicon Valley technological innovators whose unofficial slogan is "disrupt first, ask questions later".

    As the internet-driven gig economy has come to dominate a whole range of goods and services - from books and groceries to fast food deliveries and taxi rides - "disruption" has become a buzzword.

    Throwing existing service structures up in the air and seeing what comes down may not be the most scientific model. However, it promises huge potential returns to gig investors at the expense of traditional providers.

    Gig innovators portray themselves as refreshingly New Age and libertarian as they promise to free consumers and workers from the constraints of the old economy.

    "Flexibility" is another buzzword, often applied to low-income, freelance workers who are told they now have the freedom to work only when they want to. In reality, flexibility mainly favors the operator, who is the one who determines how much work is actually available.

    An upsurge in self-employment in countries such as Britain - almost 5 million people at the last count - may have more to do with the absence of secure jobs than with an innate desire of low-paid workers to "be their own boss".

    However, in another phrase that could also be the unofficial slogan of the gig innovators, "you can't stop progress". The new economic model is too far advanced to be reversed by isolated regulatory diktats. The gig revolution has spread well beyond Silicon Valley to infiltrate the global economy and inspire competitors.

    In London, Uber was already facing competition from Taxify, an Estonian taxi app backed by China's car-booking group Didi Chuxing. Acknowledging that companies must take into account the views of regulators, CEO Markus Villig promised: "The safety of riders is Taxify's top priority and we are currently working with (Transport for London) to ensure we comply with all of their regulatory requirements and safety standards."

    The gig economy has brought undoubted benefits to consumers in terms of convenience and pricing and has created many new jobs, despite the concerns about their security.

    But there will always be a need for gatekeepers in the shape of regulators, who are responsible for making sure that consumers and workers do not suffer the unintended consequences of gig-style disruption.

    In the face of a tougher regulatory climate, Airbnb, the booking app that allows visitors to arrange short-term stays in private residences, announced restrictions this year on the use of its service in London. One unintended consequence of such holiday rental services had been to reduce the supply of homes for ordinary Londoners.

    Perhaps the Airbnb move and the readiness of Uber to negotiate with the regulators are an indication that the gig economy is maturing. Ethically examining the likely consequences of innovation may eventually overtake the disruptive gig mantra of throwing everything up in the air and watching it come crashing down.

    The author is a senior editorial consultant for China Daily. Contact the writer at harveymorris@gmail.com.

    (China Daily European Weekly 09/29/2017 page11)

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产精品无码一区二区三级 | 久久av高潮av无码av喷吹 | а天堂中文在线官网| 无码视频在线观看| 最近中文字幕完整在线看一| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦| 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕| 最近新中文字幕大全高清| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网站| 久久久久久久亚洲Av无码| 人妻少妇AV无码一区二区| 日本免费在线中文字幕| 中文无码vs无码人妻| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产| 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 亚洲精品成人无码中文毛片不卡| 久久亚洲AV永久无码精品| 国产白丝无码免费视频| 人妻少妇乱子伦无码视频专区 | 无码精品A∨在线观看| 无码av人妻一区二区三区四区 | 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 91中文在线视频| 久热中文字幕无码视频| 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看精品中文| 久久亚洲精品无码观看不卡| 88国产精品无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看牲色| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区不卡| 午夜人性色福利无码视频在线观看 | 久久午夜福利无码1000合集| 精品久久久久中文字| 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕| 最近中文字幕在线| 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产 | 精品亚洲成A人无码成A在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕视频国产| 中文字幕av高清有码| 中文人妻无码一区二区三区| 亚洲国产综合无码一区|