Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    HongKong Comment(1)

    Financial de-risking creates unexpected risks

    HK Edition | Updated: 2017-10-17 07:38
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    The world today faces multiple crises on several fronts, from prevailing global political unrest and the rise of terrorism and cyberattacks, to the increasingly sophisticated methods used by criminal gangs to launder their ill-gotten gains. Governments around the world have responded, with mixed results, by imposing ever-stricter policies on financial institutions to minimize the possibility that they may inadvertently - or indeed purposefully - assist such activities. The understandable logic behind all this, of course, is that better monitoring of cash flows helps build a more secure financial sector that is harder to manipulate for nefarious purposes.

    As a result, resources deployed by financial institutions to conquer these scourges have increased exponentially over the past five years. Anti-money-laundering compliance costs in Asia alone amounted to $1.5 billion last year, risk-management and research service provider LexisNexis estimated. The impact this has had on financial institutions in Hong Kong has been stark - the city's Joint Financial Intelligence Unit received about 77,000 suspicious transaction reports last year, an increase of around 55,000 from four years previously. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority, meanwhile, can now impose fines of as much as HK$10 million per breach, and in the first few quarters of last year seized assets worth up to HK$105 million following investigations.

    So it appears the stringent monitoring requirements recently imposed by local authorities have been somewhat successful. And yet these actions have had significant unexpected consequences, perhaps the most prominent of which is the rise of a phenomenon known as "de-risking". Entire portfolios and client types deemed high-risk - a result of cumbersome "know your client" requirements - are being denied basic banking services. A recent HKMA survey showed both individuals and businesses are finding it much tougher to open a bank account locally, as requirements to document a customer's source of funds, provision of business services, expected transaction patterns, and many others, are becoming increasingly burdensome. Customers are also complaining that documentation is being demanded in an often-haphazard manner and with little clear guidance, ensuring the process can be drawn out dramatically. Small- and medium-sized businesses engaged in certain sectors - such as jewelry, precious gemstones, or trade-based finance - are being particularly hard hit.

    This issue is not just prevalent in Hong Kong. A World Bank global review in 2015 revealed that 46 percent of money transfer operators surveyed had received notification from their bank over the previous few years regarding the forthcoming closure of their accounts. A further Dow Jones study the following year revealed that 40 percent of more than 800 financial-service providers surveyed had within the previous 12 months terminated a full business line or segment due to new regulatory obligations imposed on them by their local authorities. The subsequent costs involved in monitoring that risk had resulted in the service line becoming inherently unprofitable.

    With all this, it is easy to forget those who are most likely to be directly affected by these regulations. As money transfer operators find it increasingly difficult to operate, there are whole segments of society, including many hundreds of thousands of immigrants in Hong Kong, who may soon experience the full effect of de-risking. Remittances contribute significantly to sustaining the welfare of approximately 700 million people around the world, often representing the most vital source of income for food, housing, education and healthcare locally. Non-government organizations and charities are also affected, with evidence mounting that those reliant on humanitarian assistance are being denied basic necessities as these accounts are closed. Indeed, up to 14 percent of respondents to the Dow Jones survey admitted they were considering exiting their business relationship with such organizations.

    The HKMA has at last begun to respond to some of the concerns that have been raised. A recent circular emphasized that financial institutions providing retail and other services accessible to a wide number of customers should not adopt practices that would result in financial exclusion. Instead, such organizations should provide a "risk-based approach" based on proportionality and "risk differentiation" for each customer. Nevertheless, the circular was light on specific actions financial institutions can take to actually achieve this. To confuse the matter further, the Securities and Futures Commission continues to take a hard line on activities it oversees, such as access to investment services.

    It is clear Hong Kong will soon start to lose its competitive edge to economies such as the Chinese mainland, which has already seen an uptick in hiring as they pick up portfolios that other banks around the world have felt are too risky to maintain, such as in shipping finance. To counter this, authorities in the city must get on the same page and become fully committed to a unified approach. Anybody who owns a small jewelry business or runs a local charity may well feel that both the government, as well as those financial institutions that maintain their accounts, have some way to go.

    The author is a risk-management consultant and writer who has worked in Asia for the past 16 years.

    (HK Edition 10/17/2017 page9)

     

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲av麻豆aⅴ无码电影| 中文字幕无码成人免费视频| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 亚洲国产精品无码久久九九 | 国产台湾无码AV片在线观看| 日韩亚洲国产中文字幕欧美| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久| 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站| 少妇极品熟妇人妻无码| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆 | avtt亚洲一区中文字幕| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无码AV | 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产| 亚洲国产综合无码一区二区二三区| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频| 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区 | 无码人妻熟妇AV又粗又大| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美中文字幕高清在线| 本免费AV无码专区一区| 亚洲Aⅴ无码专区在线观看q| 高潮潮喷奶水飞溅视频无码| 亚洲国产人成中文幕一级二级 | 免费看成人AA片无码视频吃奶| 日本精品久久久中文字幕| 中文字幕久久波多野结衣av| 一级毛片中出无码| 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址 | 中文字幕理伦午夜福利片| 国产精品无码DVD在线观看| 2024你懂的网站无码内射| 成人av片无码免费天天看| 国产爆乳无码一区二区麻豆| 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区 | 国产午夜无码片免费| 国产精品午夜福利在线无码| 国产精品无码免费专区午夜| 亚洲gv天堂无码男同在线观看|