Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Europe

    Still time for US to reconsider UNESCO

    By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-10-20 08:34
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    Ultimately, the international body will only be able to fulfill its global goal if all countries show commitment

    What do the Great Wall of China, the Grand Canyon and the bomb-battered Syrian city of Aleppo have in common? They are all listed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization as sites of global cultural or physical significance.

    UNESCO's role in promoting cooperation among states to protect more than 1,000 global heritage sites for present and future generations is the most visible of its functions, and ideally should be its least contentious.

    But, as the recent decisions of the US and Israel to withdraw from the world body illustrate, even culture can be politicized.

    The immediate motive of the rift was UNESCO's alleged "continuing anti-Israeli bias", in part through its designation of ancient holy sites in the region as "Palestinian".

    A US State Department statement also cited the organization's alleged overspending and the need for internal reform. The spat with UNESCO, coming from a president who came to office promising to redraw the US relationship with the United Nations, should not have come as a surprise.

    But, beyond the pros and cons of the immediate dispute involving Israel, the US decision reflects a perception in Washington, long predating the presidency of Donald Trump, that UNESCO does not reflect US interests.

    The organization was formed in the immediate aftermath of World War II with an agenda that broadly reflected the philosophy of the dominant Western powers in rebuilding a system of education and culture geared to preventing future conflicts.

    In 1983, when Washington announced on a previous occasion that it was quitting, the State Department declared: "UNESCO has extraneously politicized virtually every subject it deals with, has exhibited hostility toward the basic institutions of a free society, especially a free market and a free press, and has demonstrated unrestrained budgetary expansion."

    UNESCO was accused by the administration of then president Ronald Reagan of serving anti-US political ends, pursuing misguided policies and extravagantly overspending.

    That initial rift underlined the reality that UNESCO had become less a forum for uniting all states behind common goals than a forum in which alternative world views clashed.

    The focus of the dispute in the mid-1980s was the role of the Western media in covering what in those days was termed the "Third World", and demands within UNESCO for a new world economic order in which rich countries would transfer resources to poorer ones.

    In the 21st century, with multiple tensions confronting the world, reviving divisions over UNESCO and other global organizations can only be viewed as a negative development.

    At the end of the day, UNESCO's mission to preserve world culture, to work toward quality education for all as a basic human right, extend the benefits of science and establish heritage as a bridge between generations and nations, is more important than scoring political points.

    There has already been speculation that China will take a more prominent role within UNESCO, not least by making up some of the financial shortfall created by US funding cuts that date to 2011.

    Beijing reaffirmed its commitment to UNESCO following the US announcement, and the Foreign Ministry said China wanted to do more toward cooperation within the organization.

    Ultimately, however, the body can only fulfill its global goal if all countries show a similar commitment. Whatever the current disagreements, it would be better to have the US defending its corner from the inside rather than sniping from the outside.

    The US rejoined UNESCO two decades after the initial rift when Washington decided, in the wake of the Sept 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, that it was better to have friends than enemies in the international community.

    It will be a year before Washington's latest withdrawal comes into force, perhaps time enough to reconsider.

    The author is a senior editorial consultant for China Daily. Contact the writer at harveymorris@gmail.com.

    (China Daily European Weekly 10/20/2017 page13)

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    √天堂中文官网在线| 永久免费无码网站在线观看个| yy111111电影院少妇影院无码| 中文字幕精品视频| 中文字幕网伦射乱中文| 亚洲精品无码国产| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无 | 亚洲国产AV无码专区亚洲AV| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久 | 亚洲色无码专区在线观看| 婷婷色中文字幕综合在线 | 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 中文字幕亚洲男人的天堂网络 | 国产精品三级在线观看无码| 中文字幕一区二区三区日韩精品 | 无码日韩精品一区二区人妻| 久久AV无码精品人妻糸列| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕| 中文字幕在线免费看线人| 色视频综合无码一区二区三区| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久| 日本久久中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 惠民福利中文字幕人妻无码乱精品 | 亚洲日韩v无码中文字幕| 日本乱中文字幕系列观看| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久久久曰| 国产精品无码专区在线观看| 国产精品亚洲аv无码播放| 日韩人妻无码精品一专区| 亚洲AV无码1区2区久久| 国产综合无码一区二区辣椒| 中文字幕在线观看日本| 暖暖日本免费中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 最近免费中文字幕MV在线视频3| 免费 无码 国产在线观看观| av无码免费一区二区三区| 国产激情无码视频在线播放性色| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安|