Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    HongKong Comment(1)

    'Hong Kong people' could be a dangerous concept

    HK Edition | Updated: 2017-11-07 07:41
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    I happened to read my last piece in this column as it was printed, which I seldom do, and was surprised to find that the term I used, Hongkongers, was changed to "the Hong Kong people" throughout the piece.

    I would like to clarify that I certainly did not mean to say "the Hong Kong people". I do not believe there is a "Hong Kong people" and I strongly oppose any suggestion that it exists.

    "A people" is a political concept. It is a plurality of persons considered as a whole, as is the case with an ethnic group or nation. Collectively, for example, the contemporary Frisians and Danes are two related Germanic peoples, while various Middle Eastern ethnic groups are often linguistically categorized as Semitic peoples.

    Various states govern, or claim to govern, in the name of the people. Both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire used the Latin term Senatus Populusque Romanus (the Senate and People of Rome). This term was fixed to Roman legionary standards, and even after the Roman emperors achieved a state of total personal autarchy, they continued to wield their power in the name of the Senate and People of Rome.

    The claim that there is a Hong Kong people is dangerous. Article I of the United Nations Charter provides that: "All peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development." This right to self-determination is recognized as a right of all peoples in the first article common to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

    Our nation is called the People's Republic of China for a reason. It represents, and therefore presupposes, a Chinese people. Chinese, as a whole, are a people. As a people, we have the right to freely determine our political status and freely pursue our economic, social and cultural development. We value this right, but we have to be careful how we define "our people".

    The first thing separatists do is to claim that they are a distinctive people, and that it is unjust to group their people together with others who happen to share the same piece of land. That's also what some people in Hong Kong are trying to do, although they are all Chinese and immigrants from outside of Hong Kong.

    Hongkongers and the Hong Kong people are two different things. We can also call them people in Hong Kong, or Hong Kong residents. Likewise, there is no such thing as a Hong Kong citizen because many Hongkongers are nationals of foreign countries.

    This confusion may have to do with our mistaken attempt to distance ourselves from the early years of our nation, a trend that President Xi Jinping has warned us against. As you can see, the word people has a political meaning from the first day it was born. The Chinese word for people is renmin, a Marxist-Maoist political concept that embodies both rights and responsibilities. If we remember that, we wouldn't be using the word people lightly.

    The phrase "Hong Kong people" reinforces the concept that there exists a distinct ethnic group in Hong Kong, while terminology such as Hongkongers is less objectifying. Similarly, we would not call New Yorkers "the New York people", which just does not sound right.

    Permanent residents of Hong Kong consist of different ethnic groups and people from around the world. There are Han-Chinese, Southeast Asians, Anglo-Saxons and many others. Many Hong Kong residents who are Chinese ethnically nonetheless are holders of non-PRC passports. Some were born and raised here, many were immigrants. Those permanent residents who are also Chinese nationals will eventually enjoy the same rights and responsibilities as with the other Chinese people, or renmin.

    Words are powerful. They have the ability to summon reality into being. We must resist using words that will suggest things that do not exist. When others use them, we have to politely point out that they should not and state why.

    (HK Edition 11/07/2017 page7)

    Today's Top News

    Editor's picks

    Most Viewed

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲av日韩av高潮潮喷无码 | 中文字幕一区日韩在线视频| 无码精品久久久久久人妻中字| 国产一区二区中文字幕| av无码一区二区三区| 亚洲av无码乱码国产精品fc2| 最近中文字幕完整版资源| 永久无码精品三区在线4| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费 | 日韩精品无码免费专区午夜不卡| 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 国产精品va无码一区二区| 亚洲国产精品无码专区在线观看| 最近中文字幕在线| 狠狠干中文字幕| 中文字幕乱码无码人妻系列蜜桃 | 免费无码黄十八禁网站在线观看| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码免下载| 亚洲欧美在线一区中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2020| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区国产| 国产成年无码久久久久毛片| 日韩AV片无码一区二区不卡电影| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区系列| 精品无码成人片一区二区98| 中文字幕日韩人妻不卡一区| 最近中文字幕高清免费中文字幕mv| 久久中文字幕人妻熟av女| 中文字幕在线无码一区二区三区| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水| 亚洲伊人成无码综合网| 亚洲 另类 无码 在线| 中文字幕亚洲码在线| 制服丝袜中文字幕在线| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 国产精品中文字幕在线观看| 久久精品?ⅴ无码中文字幕| 中文字幕久久精品| 一本加勒比hezyo无码专区| 无码视频一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕|