Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Think twice about imposing property tax

    By Yang Zhiyong | China Daily | Updated: 2017-11-29 08:30
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    Huang Qifan, vice-chairman of the economic and finance committee of the National People's Congress, the country's top legislature, said at a recent forum that the imposition of residential property tax is imperative, listing four major advantages of the move. Before that, in November 2013, the Third Plenum of the 18th Communist Party of China Central Committee had said legislation on real estate tax will be accelerated, and the tax reform will be promoted in time.

    Internationally, house property tax refers to levying tax on all houses based on value appraisals. Only when a residential property tax is imposed on all houses can such a move be considered fair, and benefit the local governments and the grassroots taxation system. Global experiences show the local governments of a country that levy a residential property tax also enjoy sufficient transfer of payment from higher levels of governments or the central government.

    But in China, such transfers of payments are limited, which means income from house property tax will not be enough to meet the local governments' expenditure.

    Besides, one of the difficulties in levying a property tax on individuals and households is that it is imposed on a natural person's real estate asset that doesn't necessarily produce direct cash flow. And since levying individual income tax on natural persons is difficult in China, imposing tax on an individual's real estate asset, which doesn't produce cash flow, will be equally, if not more, difficult.

    To successfully levy such a tax on individuals, the authorities should first win the support of the majority of the people.

    Individual property tax programs were piloted in Chongqing and Shanghai on Jan 28, 2011. But the continuously rising housing prices in these cities have prevented the people from being convinced that a property tax would effectively check the trend to a large extent.

    Whether property tax can curb rising housing prices depends on the form and structure of the real estate market. If the real estate market is a seller's market, the property tax will be paid by the homebuyers. And it will be difficult for homebuyers to transfer the property tax which they have to pay every year by deducting it from the total housing price.

    Under such circumstances, a more likely result would be homebuyers paying for their property according to prevailing prices and shouldering the property tax burden in the future.

    Some people assume imposing a property tax could accelerate the development of house rental market. But since even homeowners who rent out their houses have to pay the property tax, they are likely to transfer the cost to the tenants. In that case, the property tax can hardly help improve people's livelihoods.

    In addition, when the real estate market is sluggish, the property tax might probably become the last straw that breaks the market's back. A rapid slump in the real estate market could lead to a financial crisis, even fiscal crisis, undermining social stability, which none of us wants to see.

    Accelerating legislation on property tax and promoting tax reform in time are necessary. But some people suppose China's property tax system design should follow the model of developed countries, which is wrong considering China's special land ownership system. In China, urban land belongs to the State and rural land to collectives. Given the public ownership of land, the local governments can generate income from the transfer of land-use rights. This system is different from those followed by most other countries.

    Moreover, the house property taxation system should also take the paying capacity of households into consideration. Because of the high housing prices and comparatively low individual incomes, a large number of people cannot afford to pay a high residential property tax even if they are willing to do so. And under what rules will the property tax be imposed on welfare-oriented houses that were sold at very low prices?

    Any discrepancy here could undermine the fairness of levying the property tax.

    Therefore, while enacting the property tax, complicated problems should be fully discussed in order to avoid the negative social effects of imposing such a tax in a hurry.

    The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

    =

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩a级无码免费视频| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频 | 中文字幕欧美日韩在线不卡| 亚洲日韩中文无码久久| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区| 色偷偷一区二区无码视频| 中文字幕一区日韩在线视频| 日韩视频无码日韩视频又2021 | 亚洲av无码乱码国产精品fc2| 狠狠干中文字幕| 亚洲Av无码乱码在线znlu| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久99| 日韩av无码中文无码电影| 成人午夜福利免费无码视频| 亚洲av无码av制服另类专区| 久久久久亚洲AV无码观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕| 精品久久久久久中文字幕人妻最新| 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃百度| 国产做无码视频在线观看浪潮| 中文字幕丰满乱子伦无码专区| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕免费在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩在线中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲欧美专区| 最近2019中文免费字幕在线观看| 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 黄桃AV无码免费一区二区三区| 未满小14洗澡无码视频网站| 亚洲V无码一区二区三区四区观看| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 国产成人无码一二三区视频| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 亚洲看片无码在线视频| 日本无码小泬粉嫩精品图| 亚洲精品无码乱码成人| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看裸奔| 人禽无码视频在线观看|