Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    Business
    Home / Business / Motoring

    Lawsuits accuse top automakers of faulty air bags, delays

    China Daily | Updated: 2018-03-19 11:06
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A Takata logo is seen on a display of child safety seats at a car showroom on June 26, 2017 in Tokyo, Japan.[Photo by Christopher Jue/Getty Images]

    DETROIT-General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Volkswagen and Mercedes all knew of problems with dangerous exploding Takata air bag inflators years before issuing recalls, according to three class actions filed on Wednesday with the federal court in Miami.

    The lawsuits cite company documents obtained through previous legal actions against other automakers over faulty Takata inflators.

    The plaintiffs allege that automakers were informed of inflator defects during tests but delayed taking action.

    Allegations against GM are among the most serious. Takata documents showed that GM employees expressed concerns about inflators rupturing as early as 2003.

    GM on Wednesday called the lawsuit "baseless and without merit" and said it misstates "a host of material facts".

    Mercedes-Benz called the allegations unfounded, and Fiat Chrysler declined to comment, saying it had not been served with a copy. Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from VW.

    Takata uses the chemical ammonium nitrate to create small explosions to inflate air bags. But the chemical can deteriorate when exposed to high temperatures and airborne moisture.

    That causes it to explode with too much force, blowing apart a metal canister and hurling shrapnel. At least 22 people have died worldwide and more than 180 have been hurt.

    The problem touched off the largest series of automotive recalls in US history, with 19 automakers having to recall up to 69 million inflators in 42 million vehicles.

    The problem brought a criminal conviction and fine against Takata and forced the Japanese company into bankruptcy protection.

    The lawsuits, which consolidate individual claims that were filed previously, allege that owners paid higher prices for their vehicles than they would have if the defect had been disclosed.

    They allege that manufacturers picked Takata to supply inflators because the cost was less than other air bag makers who used different, less volatile chemicals as propellants.

    "These auto manufacturers were well aware of the public safety risks posed by Takata's airbags long ago, and still waited years to disclose them to the public and take action," Peter Prieto, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.

    In an April 2003 communication with Takata, GM was concerned about "ballistic variability", which is a tendency for the air bags to either underinflate or explode when deployed, the lawsuit against GM said.

    In 2004, Takata employees met with GM officials about a tendency for the inflators to shoot flames when they ruptured, and in March of 2006, Takata reported that inflators tested for GM vehicles continued to show "aggressive behavior", including the escape of "molten propellant" when they ruptured.

    Yet GM didn't issue any recalls until June 2014 when it recalled 29,000 Chevrolet Cruze compact cars from the 2013 and 2014 model years, according to the lawsuit.

    "Defendants did nothing to meaningfully investigate the problem, notify the appropriate regulators or notify the class (car owners)," the lawsuit stated.

    GM also received reports of real-world problems in 2011 and 2014, including one case in which a Cruze driver was blinded in one eye by an exploding inflator, according to the lawsuit. GM and Takata blamed the trouble on a manufacturing problem instead of the deteriorating ammonium nitrate.

    "Rather than publicize the truth, both Takata and GM blamed the ruptures on a manufacturing problem," the lawsuit alleged.

    Volkswagen, the lawsuit alleged, had repeated quality issues with Takata dating to 2003, even rejecting products after an audit. Yet no recalls were issued until 2016, the plaintiffs claimed.

    Daimler, maker of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, had concerns about the integrity of Takata inflators in 2003, according to company emails.

    In 2004, Mercedes engineers agreed to "forego key performance variables" and allow use of Takata inflators, the lawsuit stated. The company didn't do any recalls until 2016.

    Fiat Chrysler didn't issue its first recall until 2014, even though its engineers expressed concerns about Takata inflators during the early 2000s, the lawsuit stated.

    Last year Toyota, BMW, Mazda, Subaru, Nissan and Honda settled similar economic loss class actions for millions of dollars.

    AP

    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    CLOSE
     
    亚洲AV无码专区在线播放中文| 中文字幕人妻无码系列第三区| 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 久本草在线中文字幕亚洲欧美 | 亚洲无码精品浪潮| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区免费| 亚洲精品无码av天堂| 国产免费无码一区二区| 国产又爽又黄无码无遮挡在线观看| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 成在人线AV无码免观看麻豆| 无码少妇一区二区三区| 在线a亚洲v天堂网2019无码| 亚洲日本中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码鲁网中文电影| 久久亚洲av无码精品浪潮| 国产av永久无码天堂影院| 成人无码AV一区二区| 亚洲天堂中文字幕在线| 最近中文字幕免费完整| 波多野结衣在线中文| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 国产精品无码免费专区午夜| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码下载| 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影| 一区二区三区人妻无码| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 免费A级毛片无码A∨免费| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪网站| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区96| 成人午夜福利免费无码视频| 亚洲精品色午夜无码专区日韩| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲AV无码专区国产乱码电影| 亚洲va无码专区国产乱码| 麻豆亚洲AV永久无码精品久久| 国产成年无码久久久久毛片| heyzo专区无码综合| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费|