Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

    Blame the privileged for the anger in US

    By Andrew Sheng and Xiao Geng | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-06-30 21:29
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    Many blame today’s populist rebellion in the West on the far right, which has won votes by claiming to be responding to working-class grievances, while stoking fear and promoting polarization. But, in blaming leaders who have seized on popular anger, many overlook the power of that anger itself, which is aimed at elites whose wealth has skyrocketed in the past 30 years, while that of the middle- and lower-income groups has remained stagnant.

    Two recent analyses get to the heart of the issues at play, particularly in the United States, but also in the rest of the world. In his new book Tailspin, journalist Steven Brill argues that US institutions are no longer fit for purpose, because they protect only a few and leave the rest vulnerable to predatory behavior in the name of free market. According to Brill, this is an upshot of the US’ meritocracy: the best and brightest had the chance to climb to the top, but then essentially pulled the ladder up behind them, as they captured democratic institutions and used them to entrench special privileges for themselves.

    Author Matthew Stewart agrees, arguing that, “the meritocratic class has mastered the old trick of consolidating wealth and passing privilege along at the expense of other people’s children”. Stewart shows that in the mid-1980s, the share of US wealth held by the bottom 90 percent of the population peaked at 35 percent; three decades later, they owned just 20 percent, with almost all of what they lost going to the top 0.1 percent. The 9.9 percent between these two groups — what Stewart calls the “new American aristocracy” — comprises what used to be called the middle class. In 1963, the 90 percent needed to increase their wealth sixfold to reach the level of the 9.9 percent; by the 2010s, they needed 25 times their wealth to reach that level.

    Much of the US population is working harder than ever, yet has suffered a decline in living standards, compounded by high levels of household debt and, in many cases, lack of health insurance. The top 10 percent have easy access to higher education that will enable their children to have the same privileges as them; the bottom 90 percent must work much harder to cover sky-high tuition fees, and typically graduate with a heavy debt burden. The top 10 percent receive first-rate medical care; the bottom 90 percent often do not, or must pay an exceptionally high price for it.

    Taxation is supposed to level the playing field. But US Republicans have long pushed to lower taxes on the rich, arguing that lowering marginal tax rates will promote investment, employment and economic growth, which will cause the wealth to “trickle down” to the rest of society. In fact, tax cuts for the rich further entrench their advantages, exacerbating inequality.

    Making matters worse, the poor pay more indirect taxes (on land, real estate and consumer goods), and the bottom 20 percent of the US population pays more than twice what the top 1 percent pays in state taxes. Add to that the challenges posed by automation and robotization, not to mention increasingly frequent and intense natural disasters, and it is not hard to see why so many people are so furious.

    According to Stewart, the 9.9 percent is “the staff that runs the machine that funnels resources from the 90 percent to the 0.1 percent,” happily taking its “cut of the spoils”. But the inequality that this machine generates can have serious consequences, as it spurs social discontent and, as we are seeing in the US today, erratic policymaking. As the Austrian historian Walter Scheidel argues, inequality has historically been countered through war, revolution, state collapse or natural disaster.

    Avoiding such a dramatic event would require the 10 percent to do a much better job of advancing the interests of the 90 percent, in terms of income, wealth, welfare and opportunities. Yet a combination of economic myopia and political polarization has led many instead to try to divert popular anger toward immigrants, China, and trade (including with close allies). As a result, the entire world is now caught in an escalating protectionist war that nobody will win.

    It is true that, historically, internal contradictions and imbalances have often led to interstate conflict. But that is not inevitable. Rather, the outcome depends on the quality of leadership. In the US, for example, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt succeeded in strengthening their country because they recognized the need to address internal divisions in the light of America’s core values, global position and long-term goals.

    US President Donald Trump has exploited popular anger to advance his own interests. But he did not create that anger; America’s elites have done that over decades, creating the conditions for a figure like Trump to emerge. Now that Trump is in charge, the conditions of the 90 percent are set to deteriorate further. His approach to trade, in particular, will not only fail to help the people he purports to represent; it will also destroy the sense of fairness and stewardship that has historically bound the masses to their leaders.

    Blaming outsiders is politically expedient. But the only way to “make America great again” is by addressing its internal injustices. No import tariff or border wall can do that.

    Andrew Sheng is distinguished fellow at the Asia Global Institute at the University of Hong Kong and a member of the UNEP Advisory Council on Sustainable Finance. And Xiao Geng, president of the Hong Kong Institution for International Finance, is a professor at the University of Hong Kong.
    Project Syndicate

    ?

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕理伦午夜福利片| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播放HE | 无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妞av无码区| 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕 | AV无码人妻中文字幕| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品 | 中文字幕不卡高清视频在线| 少妇无码太爽了不卡视频在线看| 国产在线无码精品电影网| 少女视频在线观看完整版中文| 毛片无码免费无码播放| 国产成人无码一区二区三区在线| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕一区| 国产成人无码精品久久久免费| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲天堂中文字幕在线| 中文无码久久精品| 亚洲精品无码99在线观看| 少妇人妻无码精品视频| 亚洲熟妇无码乱子AV电影| 亚洲一区中文字幕久久| 亚洲精品无码永久中文字幕| 免费a级毛片无码免费视频| 国产激情无码一区二区app| 小13箩利洗澡无码视频网站| 精品多人p群无码| 国产亚洲精久久久久久无码77777| 久久中文字幕视频、最近更新| 免费A级毛片无码A∨中文字幕下载 | 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频| 国产成A人亚洲精V品无码性色 | AV无码精品一区二区三区| 日韩人妻无码精品久久久不卡 | 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 中文字幕亚洲无线码a| 中文字幕无码毛片免费看| 中文字幕无码久久人妻| 成人A片产无码免费视频在线观看| 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇App|