Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / China-US

    CEO: FedEx cannot be US govt's policeman

    By Heng Weili in New York and Liu Zhihua in Beijing | China Daily | Updated: 2019-06-26 23:32
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A FedEx delivery worker carries a package for a delivery in Wilmette, Illinois, Oct 27, 2015. [Photo/Agencies]

    As FedEx Corp faces pressure after mishandling packages involving China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, the US company has sued the US government, claiming that it is "a transportation company, not a law enforcement agency."

    FedEx filed a suit on Monday in US District Court in Washington DC, seeking to enjoin the US Department of Commerce from enforcing prohibitions contained in the Export Administration Regulations, also known as the EAR.

    Frederick W. Smith, the company's CEO and chairman, told Fox News that FedEx cannot be the US government's policeman for export and import controls.

    "Huawei is just emblematic of the problem," Smith said.

    "The Huawei incident concerns two packages, two out of 15 million ... That is exactly the kind of confusing situation when any tiny number of packages becomes an international cause celebre, because of these regulations that make FedEX and other common carriers responsible for government regulations to prohibit exports and imports, to certify that the shipper who may or may not be telling the truth is in compliance with those exports regulations.

    "Despite the fact that we have 15 million shipments a day, and if we make an error on any one of them, without a trial, without any due process, we can be fined $250,000 for a piece."

    He said the company doesn't think these regulations are based on law.

    "FedEx believes that the EAR violate common carriers' rights to due process under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution as they unreasonably hold common carriers strictly liable for shipments that may violate the EAR without requiring evidence that the carriers had knowledge of any violations," FedEx said in a statement.

    "This puts an impossible burden on a common carrier such as FedEx to know the origin and technological makeup of the contents of all the shipments it handles and whether they comply with the EAR."

    Last month, FedEx rerouted four packages bound for Huawei's headquarters in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to the United States, claiming "inadvertent misrouting."

    The incident led to a regulatory investigation by the Chinese government "on suspicion of undermining the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese clients."

    Over the weekend, FedEx returned a New York-bound package containing a Huawei smartphone, a P30 Pro, to the sender at PCMag's office in London.

    According to Fortune.com, FedEx returned the phone with a note saying the shipment was voided due to a "US government issue with Huawei and the Chinese government."

    FedEx's filing on Monday said that the US Department of Commerce restrictions "essentially deputize Fed-Ex to police the content of the millions of packages it ships daily even though doing so is a virtually impossible task, logistically, economically, and in many cases, legally."

    On May 16, the US Department of Commerce placed Huawei and 68 affiliates on an "Entity List" that restricts companies from providing Huawei and its affiliates with technology originating in the US without government approval. On May 20, however, the US Department of Commerce said there would be a 90-day grace period before the Huawei restrictions went into effect.

    The lawsuit did not mention the Huawei incidents specifically.

    "1,100 entities are now on the list (of the US Department of Commerce), with five more just added on Friday. It is impossible even with the fantastic computer systems and compliance investigation we made that we simply cannot be the policeman for the US Department of Commerce," Smith said.

    A spokesman for the US Department of Commerce told The Wall Street Journal that it had yet to review FedEx's complaint.

    FedEx's main rival, United Parcel Service Inc, said on Tuesday it would not be a party to the lawsuit.

    The US has accused Huawei of violating sanctions against Iran, a country with which it is currently involved in an escalating political dispute.

    Huawei has said that the US sanctions could cost it billions of dollars in revenue. Numerous US semiconductor companies also stand to lose substantial business with Huawei due to the restrictions.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    精品无码人妻一区二区三区品| 日韩精品无码免费视频| 亚洲精品无码av天堂| 麻豆国产精品无码视频| 中文字幕乱码中文乱码51精品| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区 | 暖暖免费在线中文日本| 精品人无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码播放免费| 69久久精品无码一区二区| 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文 | 中文字幕日韩理论在线| 中文字幕无码日韩专区免费| 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一 | 国产精品无码无需播放器| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久| 天堂网www中文天堂在线| 中文精品久久久久人妻不卡| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦| 蜜臀精品无码AV在线播放| 欧洲人妻丰满av无码久久不卡 | 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 最近中文字幕完整版资源| 一本大道香蕉中文在线高清 | 国产AV无码专区亚洲AWWW| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码 | 四虎影视无码永久免费| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩av乱码| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区| 自拍中文精品无码| 成人无码免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码永久在线观看你懂的| 亚洲综合av永久无码精品一区二区 | yy111111少妇影院里无码| 精品无码AV无码免费专区| Aⅴ精品无码无卡在线观看| 播放亚洲男人永久无码天堂| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲视频| 中文最新版地址在线| 亚洲激情中文字幕|