Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    Firms must pay cost of breaking contracts

    By Shen Dingli | China Daily | Updated: 2019-07-24 07:09
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Huawei logos at an exhibition stand in Nanjing, Jiangsu province on Sept 1, 2018. [Photo/VCG]

    China has announced it will create an "unreliable entity list" for those foreign companies that violate business contracts with their Chinese counterparts. Beijing's move is apparently in response to the United States putting an increasing number of Chinese companies on its Entity List on the pretext of safeguarding its national security.

    For example, Washington said Huawei and five other Chinese high-tech companies pose a threat to "US security" and put them on the Entity List while asking US companies not to conduct business with any of them. But after the two heads of state met on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka last month and decided to resume the bilateral talks, the US has agreed to allow US enterprises to supply components to Huawei.

    Thanks to economic globalization, international trade has become deeply intertwined, with most companies specializing only in some areas and outsourcing their requirements. As a result, different companies contribute differently to the global production chain.

    The US administration may have some legitimate concerns due to some foreign companies' rising technological competence. For instance, as a global leader in 5G technology, Huawei has an edge over its US counterparts, which for the US is enough reason to believe China could challenge its dominance in high-tech.

    China, too, has faced similar challenges because of its open-door policy which allows US information and communications technology companies to operate in the country. Yet China has never denied US companies access to its market as long as they observe the law, allow their data to be stored in China to preempt any terrorism-related activities-and their devices don't have backdoors to facilitate espionage.

    Similarly, Washington could ask Huawei to allow its data to be collected and stored in the US, and check its devices for any backdoor. Besides, Huawei has refuted claims that it has installed backdoors in its devices. Still, the US executive branch has banned the sales of Huawei products in the US-and previously had disallowed companies based in the US and allied countries to do business with Huawei-which, according to the Chinese company's estimate, could cost it $30 billion over the next two years.

    Before the meeting between the two heads of state, many US and foreign companies were forced to follow the White House's diktats to protect their overall interests and breach their contracts with Huawei by stopping supplies to the Chinese company.

    China's "unreliable entity list" is aimed at deterring foreign businesses from doing so and causing irreparable damage to Chinese companies. The list will remind such foreign companies that if they breach their contracts with Chinese companies without any valid reason, they could lose access to China's market.

    Moreover, a wider set of criteria could be used to determine "unreliable entities". For instance, FedEx mistakenly shipped Huawei's express mail from an office in Japan to a US address, instead of China. In response, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Geng Shuang, while addressing a regular news conference on June 24, said the "operational error" of FedEx was an unethical breach of the company's own code. Which suggests companies committing such "operational errors" could end up on China's "unreliable entity list".

    Nominally, the "unreliable entity list" would be applicable to those companies that suddenly breach their business contracts with Chinese enterprises. But such a deterrence mechanism has other uses too. For example, it could deter US enterprises from participating in arms sales to Taiwan, which is a contentious issue in Sino-US relations. As Geng said at a news conference on July 15, to safeguard national interests, the Chinese mainland government and enterprises will not do business with the US companies that cooperate or participate in arms sales to Taiwan.

    Since some US weapon-making enterprises also manufacture products for civilian use, they need to tap the huge mainland market to increase their revenues. The fact that they could be put on Beijing's "unreliable entity list" for selling arms to Taiwan would prompt them to weigh the relative costs and benefits of indulging in anti-Beijing activities and losing the mainland market. It's high time Beijing imposed sanctions on US companies that harm China's national security interests so they realize the time when they could get away with anti-China activities without paying a cost is over.

    The author is a professor and former executive dean of the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University. The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩精品无码中文字幕一区二区| 亚洲AV无码一区二区一二区| 亚洲熟妇少妇任你躁在线观看无码| 亚洲精品人成无码中文毛片| 国产成A人亚洲精V品无码性色| 中文字幕在线观看一区二区| 在线看中文福利影院| 国产在线无码不卡影视影院 | 一本大道无码日韩精品影视| 熟妇无码乱子成人精品| 中文字幕无码久久精品青草| 暖暖免费日本在线中文| 无码高清不卡| 精品一区二区无码AV | 性无码专区无码片| 中文字幕精品一区| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 中文无码vs无码人妻 | 最好看的中文字幕2019免费 | 在线中文字幕播放| 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜| 亚洲一区二区三区无码影院| 无码精品人妻一区| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码 | h无码动漫在线观看| 免费无遮挡无码永久视频| 西西午夜无码大胆啪啪国模| 永久免费av无码网站yy| 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码电影| 爆操夜夜操天天操中文| 亚洲天堂中文资源| 免费中文字幕视频| 无码八A片人妻少妇久久| 免费A级毛片无码A∨免费| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线观看 | 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱子伦 | 精品久久久久久无码国产| 精品人妻系列无码人妻免费视频|