Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    China
    Home / China / HK Macao

    Education flaws linked to HK unrest

    China Daily Global | Updated: 2019-09-02 09:34
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Protesters (above) prepare to throw gasoline bombs at police officers at Causeway Bay in
    Hong Kong on Saturday. [Photo/Xinhua]

    Currently, textbooks are published by different local publishers, and schools can choose whichever textbooks they prefer. Unlike those for the three other compulsory subjects - Chinese, English and mathematics - textbooks of liberal studies do not require the approval of the Education Bureau.

    Tai said that is because the bureau has tried to avoid giving the impression of brainwashing students by being seen in any way as censoring the contents about Hong Kong's relationship to the motherland or about current affairs in the city.

    Different publishers have differing political views, and the materials in the textbooks they publish might not be comprehensive or neutral, Tai said.

    A textbook from one publisher, for instance, features controversial current issues, including a chapter aimed at fostering critical thinking, which encourages students to "occupy the playground" to show their objection to too much homework.

    In addition, some content is misleading, so the Education Bureau should be more involved in assessing the textbooks, Tai said.

    "The government should either directly provide contents for the publishers, or establish an official scrutiny mechanism for liberal studies textbooks," Tai said.

    Besides textbooks, other teaching materials have also been questioned.

    "Many fail to show the whole picture," said Ho Lok-sang, dean of business at Chu Hai College of Higher Education.

    He cited a slide presentation on the city's Basic Law, which stipulates that a nominating committee must choose candidates for chief executive, that compares the process to parents allowing children to choose toys freely from a handful of pre-chosen toys. Ho said that in the slide presentation, the "description of the provision in the Basic Law is taken totally out of context."

    Ho said that because the slide presentation doesn't explain that the nominating committee mechanism was intended to contain risks, the narrative is far from accurate. Parents have also expressed concern about some elements of education.

    Sophia Peng, the mother of a secondary school student, said she was shocked by the bias of some liberal studies textbooks.

    In addition to calling for the Education Bureau to review the textbooks, she also called on parents to ramp up efforts to guide children to gaining a balanced view.

    |<< Previous 1 2   
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
     
    狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕 | 精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 亚洲欧美日韩、中文字幕不卡| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜果冻不卡 | 五月婷婷在线中文字幕观看| 无码日韩精品一区二区人妻| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久| 国产中文字幕乱人伦在线观看 | 成人毛片无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码久久| 最近的2019免费中文字幕| 91中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲AⅤ永久无码精品AA| 久久亚洲AV成人无码电影| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区| 欧美乱人伦人妻中文字幕| 无码日韩精品一区二区人妻| 4hu亚洲人成人无码网www电影首页| 制服中文字幕一区二区| 最近中文字幕视频在线资源| 中文有码vs无码人妻| 中文字幕在线无码一区二区三区| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 无码人妻精品一区二区| 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院导航| 最近2019年免费中文字幕高清| 亚洲中文久久精品无码| 中文字幕日韩精品无码内射| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 无码人妻一区二区三区精品视频| 成在人线AV无码免观看麻豆| 精品国产一区二区三区无码| 精品久久久久久无码专区不卡| 无码超乳爆乳中文字幕久久| 日日摸日日碰夜夜爽无码| 日韩精品无码一本二本三本| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区99| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 精品视频无码一区二区三区|