Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / Americas

    Boeing CEO: MAX pilots in crashes faced multiple tasks

    By SCOTT REEVES in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2019-10-04 22:56
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Dennis Muilenburg, the CEO of The Boeing Company, speaks at an event with the Economic Club of New York in New York, New York, USA, 02 October 2019. [Photo/IC]

    The pilots of two Boeing 737 MAX jets that crashed and killed all 346 people on board may have been overwhelmed by "an already high workload environment" amid multiple cockpit warnings and may not have followed established procedures to regain control of the aircraft, Boeing's CEO believes.

    Speaking at The Economic Club of New York, CEO Dennis Muilenburg said Wednesday that investigations of the crashes aren't yet complete and therefore all findings are preliminary.

    "The early information established that in both flights, a software function activated in response to incorrect information from an external airplane sensor as part of a broader chain of events that created more workload for the pilots in what was already a high workload environment," he said.

    The aircraft flight recorder, known as the "black box", recovered after the crashes showed that multiple alarms activated prior to the accidents, including the "stick-shaker" that vibrated the pilots' control column, audible "don't sink" warnings that the planes were too close to the ground, and a "clacker" producing loud clicking to indicate the jets flew too fast, as well as multiple warning lights alerting the pilots to dangerous speed and altitude.

    Investigators believe data fed to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) automated anti-stall device appeared to be erroneous and repeatedly pointed the nose of the aircraft down to gain speed and avoid a mid-air stall, adding to the apparent chaos in the cockpit. Boeing hasn't yet submitted updated MCAS software to regulators for review.

    Testifying before Congress in June, Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the commercial airline captain credited with saving the lives of 155 people in 2009 by landing his plane in the Hudson River when both engines failed simultaneously after hitting a flock of birds, said chaotic situations in the cockpit affect pilot response to an emergency.

    "I'm one of a relatively small group of people who have experienced such a crisis and lived to share what we learned about it," he said. "I can tell you firsthand that the 'startle factor' is real —and it's huge. It absolutely interferes with one's ability to quickly analyze the crisis and take action."

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an independent federal agency charged with investigating the cause of airplane crashes and other accidents and with recommending corrective steps, said in a preliminary report on the 737 MAX crashes:

    "The pilot responses differed and did not match the assumption of pilot responses to unintended MCAS operation on which Boeing based its hazard classifications within the safety assessment and that the FAA approved and used to ensure the design safely accommodates failures."

    The NTSB said Boeing didn't consider the impact multiple cockpit alerts would have on the pilots' response to the hazard.

    The NTSB also noted that there are established procedures for checking the reliability of a plane's hardware, but as early as 2002, aircraft designers knew "there were no methods available to evaluate the probability of human error".

    Researchers have worked on the problem, but the NTSB said "such tools and methods are still not commonplace or required as part of the design certification process for functions such as MCAS on newly certified type designs".

    The NTSB last month recommended the development of "robust tools and methods for validating assumptions about pilot response to airplane failures as part of design certification". But the federal agency offered no suggestions on how to devise such tools or how to test their efficacy.

    In April, Boeing's CEO told reporters that pilots have a checklist of steps to determine the cause of the problem and correct it or overcome the difficulty by hitting cutout switches.

    Larry Williams, a former certification and regulator enforcement support specialist for the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), told members of Congress that an experienced pilot should have been able to handle the situation that confronted the pilots of Lion Air on Oct 29, 2018, and Ethiopian Airlines on March 10, 2019, before their fatal plunges.

    "You grab the yoke and pull it back, and if you can't override it, you just kick off trim and fly it manually. It's autopilot disconnect, basically. Push a button on the yoke and disconnect — grab the wheel and keep it from turning," he said.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    中文字幕在线观看国产| 成人无码视频97免费| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 中文字幕视频免费| 久久精品无码专区免费| 亚洲∧v久久久无码精品| 久久精品中文字幕有码| 国产亚洲中文日本不卡二区| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩 | 中文字幕一区日韩在线视频| 亚洲国产综合精品中文第一| 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 久久无码高潮喷水| 最近中文字幕免费2019| 最近的中文字幕在线看视频| 国产精品午夜福利在线无码| 少妇无码AV无码专区线| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 亚洲精品无码AV中文字幕电影网站| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久| 久久精品无码专区免费| 久久久无码精品午夜| 久久影院午夜理论片无码| 69ZXX少妇内射无码| 无码丰满少妇2在线观看| 亚洲爆乳无码专区| 亚洲国产a∨无码中文777| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播 | 成年免费a级毛片免费看无码| 亚洲av无码av制服另类专区| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码毛片| 亚洲AV日韩AV高潮无码专区| 无码人妻一区二区三区兔费| 亚洲V无码一区二区三区四区观看 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区三区 亚洲爆乳无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV无码久久寂寞少妇| 精品欧洲av无码一区二区14 | 亚洲AV无码成人精品区蜜桃| 亚洲级αV无码毛片久久精品| 亚洲AV无码久久精品色欲| 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区|