Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    National security law can boost trust between HK and central govt

    By Lu Wenwen | China Daily | Updated: 2019-11-20 07:23
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    According to Article 23 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, the SAR "shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies".

    Since the withdrawal of the National Security (Legislative Provisions) Bill in 2003, national security legislation in Hong Kong has been put on hold. The necessity and urgency of a national security law based on Article 23 of the Basic Law have been highlighted again, especially since the SAR government has had to deal with the worst riots in Hong Kong since its reunification with the motherland in 1997.

    On Oct 31, the communiqué of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Communist Party of China Central Committee emphasized it is important to establish and improve the legal system and law enforcement mechanism of the SAR in order to safeguard national security. Which means Hong Kong's current legal system and law enforcement mechanism are not capable enough of safeguarding local and national security.

    The proposed amendment to the SAR's extradition law might have invoked protests in Hong Kong. But there is ample proof that the camp opposed to the extradition law amendment frequently contacted foreign governments and organizations, and lobbied the US Congress to pass the so-called Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, and foreign political organizations provided supplies for the Hong Kong anti-law amendment camp, which constitute a threat to national security.

    It is clear that the discussion on Article 23 of the Basic Law should not be confined to whether the SAR needs legislation based on it, but should center on what is the most effective and quick legislation path. On the one hand, the central authority authorizes Hong Kong to enact a national security law based on Article 23, and the SAR has the constitutional responsibility of doing so. On the other hand, Article 23 draws the bottom line for the "one country, two systems" principle and Hong Kong's "high degree of autonomy", that is, safeguarding China's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    If the country's sovereignty, safety and development interests are threatened, "one country, two systems" will lose its premise and meaning. Only when the sovereignty, safety and development of the "one country" are guaranteed can the "two systems" work for the benefit of all.

    Due to the lack of a national security law in Hong Kong, the mutual trust between the central government and Hong Kong society has weakened, and the long-term implementation of "one country, two systems" not yielded the desired results. And given the complicated and fast-changing international situation, Hong Kong may face more challenges in terms of national security in the future.

    As such, a national security law based on Article 23 could guarantee that national security issues are effectively handled. In the long run, it could also rebuild trust, reduce conflicts and gradually unify the core interests of the central government and Hong Kong society.

    The central government has time and again reiterated that "one country, two systems" does not mean Hong Kong residents can endanger national security. The recent riots in Hong Kong have touched this political and legal bottom line.

    The Basic Law authorizes Hong Kong to enact a national security law because the central government believes that as a special administrative region, Hong Kong can fulfill its obligation of safeguarding national security. Yet even 22 years after Hong Kong returned to China, the SAR has not enacted any such law, which has undermined mutual political trust between the central government and Hong Kong society.

    Admittedly, it is difficult to launch discussions on legislation based on Article 23 under the current complicated situation in Hong Kong, but it is the SAR's constitutional obligation to enact a national security law, and this is an obligation Hong Kong society cannot ignore.

    The author is a researcher at the Center for Basic Laws of Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions, Shenzhen University. The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    97人妻无码一区二区精品免费| 狠狠综合久久综合中文88| 伊人蕉久中文字幕无码专区| 超清纯白嫩大学生无码网站| 国产啪亚洲国产精品无码| 亚洲一区二区三区无码中文字幕 | 午夜精品久久久久久久无码| 亚洲色无码一区二区三区| 最近2019年免费中文字幕高清| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频| 亚洲一区二区三区无码中文字幕| 最近中文字幕免费2019| 中文字幕无码久久人妻| 国产成人亚洲综合无码| 免费A级毛片无码专区| 亚洲一区二区三区AV无码 | 人妻无码精品久久亚瑟影视| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕69 | 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕| 精品999久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区| 精品亚洲A∨无码一区二区三区 | 无码精品国产VA在线观看DVD| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码| 人妻中文久久久久| 最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 亚洲日韩v无码中文字幕 | 无码国产精品一区二区免费式影视 | 中文字幕欧美在线| 天堂新版8中文在线8| 新版天堂资源中文8在线| 中文人妻av高清一区二区| 少妇中文字幕乱码亚洲影视| 人妻AV中文字幕一区二区三区 | 无码播放一区二区三区| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 亚洲色无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻AV一二区二区三区|