Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    First online premiere shakes film industry

    By Ling Bin | China Daily | Updated: 2020-02-03 09:08
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Lost in Russia [Photo provided to chinadaily.com.cn]

    On Jan 23, it was announced that seven movies scheduled for release during the Chinese New Year holiday were to be pulled from cinemas because of the novel coronavirus outbreak. However, just one day later, on the eve of the lunar New Year, some domestic online platforms, such as Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), Ixigua Video, Toutiao and Huanxi Media, announced that one of the seven films, Lost in Russia, would be available for viewing at midnight on the first day of the New Year, free of charge.

    In the afternoon of the same day, the film industry of Zhejiang province issued a statement, saying that the online premiering of Lost in Russia bypassing the theater channel was dishonest behavior that broke the industry's basic rules and would bring great losses to cinema chains. Most of the Chinese cinema chains even jointly raised an "urgent request" to the authorities asking for a regulation to put an end to any online premiering.

    The cinema chains lashed out at the online premiering of Lost in Russia claiming that not only would it damage their own economic interests, it would also violate the industry rules and be detrimental to the development of the film industry as a whole. However, as far as the law is concerned, this is at most a civil dispute between the two parties to the contract, and a third party has no standing to claim an interest, let alone the right to request the film regulators to urgently "put an end" to this activity. Unless a contract has been broken, the law does not take sides, nor does it guarantee that every market player can make money.

    To fully understand this dispute, we need to look at it from outside the perspective of existing interests and focus on the future development of the film industry from the perspective of open market and fair competition. This touches on the key issue of this dispute: the cinema chains play a dominant role in the entire movie distribution and exhibition system in China.

    The cinema channel is the core channel for China's film industry and has been in place for nearly two decades, and the online showing of Lost in Russia bypassing traditional theaters has threatened a core regime that has guaranteed the interests of cinemas over the past years.

    But while cinemas are currently the primary distribution and exhibition channel for the Chinese film industry, this has not always been the case. It is a product of the reform of China's film management system in late 2001. The reform in this direction reflects the basic model of Chinese film industry, in which the construction of theaters dominated by the large cinema chains has driven the growth of the film market and the development of upstream and middle-stream industries by expanding the downstream industry chain.

    The cinema chain regime is based on the licensing of film distributors and exhibitors, who thus have an influential say on the whole film industry. This is especially reflected in the profit ratio between the film producers and the cinema chains. The film producers would like to negotiate with the cinema chains to improve their profit margins, but the established profit distribution model does not allow them to do so, and has remained basically unchanged.

    As far as legal regulations and industry norms are concerned, there is no specific rule that a movie is only allowed to be released in theaters or can be legally premiered online. Cinema chains want to maintain and consolidate the established order between cinemas and other distribution channels so that audiences pay money at the box office. But the legal status of the online premiere by the online platform companies is still uncertain.

    China's leading internet companies have already disrupted many industries, including the film industry. In the past, internet technology enterprises were involved in the film industry in the upper-and middle-stream of the industry chain. The great significance of the film Lost in Russial lies in that it is directly connected to the downstream of the industry, thus having a subversive impact on the cinema release system. The Lost in Russia incident completely exposes the structural imbalance of the profit sharing under the current cinema-led distribution system.

    This event is not only a crisis for the Chinese cinema chains, but also touches the key interests of the worldwide film industry. If it leads to online premieres becoming more popular and clearly legal in China, the war Netflix is fighting against AMC, Regal, and Cinemark may have a new frontier in the US as well.

    The author is a professor of Peking University Law School.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产午夜鲁丝无码拍拍| 欧美日韩中文国产一区| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 无码性午夜视频在线观看| 最近免费中文字幕mv电影| 精品国产毛片一区二区无码| 人妻系列AV无码专区| 中文字幕一区二区三区久久网站| 久久久久无码国产精品不卡| 亚洲av日韩av无码黑人| 欧美亚洲精品中文字幕乱码免费高清 | 国产精品无码无需播放器| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 亚洲AV中文无码字幕色三| a最新无码国产在线视频| 亚洲AV中文无码字幕色三| 中文字幕亚洲一区二区va在线| 爆操夜夜操天天操狠操中文| 久久久久无码专区亚洲av| 潮喷失禁大喷水aⅴ无码| 精品少妇无码AV无码专区| 午夜人性色福利无码视频在线观看 | 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜在线观看| 日韩精品无码视频一区二区蜜桃| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 日本妇人成熟免费中文字幕| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载| 久久亚洲国产成人精品无码区| 成在线人免费无码高潮喷水| 精品无码无人网站免费视频| 麻豆aⅴ精品无码一区二区| 国产在线拍揄自揄拍无码| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 人妻少妇乱子伦无码视频专区| 日韩人妻无码精品久久免费一| 亚洲中文久久精品无码ww16| 成人午夜福利免费无码视频| 免费无码一区二区| 最近中文字幕在线中文视频| 无码超乳爆乳中文字幕久久| 久久中文娱乐网|