Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / World Watch

    WHO should be shielded from vagaries of politics

    By Karl Wilson | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-04-17 09:13
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A logo is pictured at the World Health Organization (WHO) building in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb 2, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

    The intention of the White House to halt funding for the World Health Organization over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic should be seen for what it is-an act of bullying.

    Since its inception in 1948, the WHO has played a pivotal role in public health issues such as tackling AIDS and formulating public health policy.

    This move by Washington is counterproductive to an organization that needs to be strengthened rather than weakened.

    The United States has had problems with the United Nations and its various agencies. Last year, the US withdrew from UNESCO. It was not the first time it has left the world's leading scientific and cultural organization. Unhappy with certain policies, especially when it came to developing nations, the US first withdrew in 1984.

    Much of the US criticism of the UN and its agencies is political.

    Criticism of the WHO ignores the good it has done globally over the past 70 years.

    In 1958, for example, it led a smallpox eradication program largely sponsored by the then Soviet Union. By 1980, the disease that killed millions had been eradicated.

    In the 1960s, the WHO promoted mass campaigns against yaws (tropical infection of the skin), endemic syphilis, leprosy and trachoma (bacterial infection of the eyes), and helped control a major cholera pandemic in Asia and the Western Pacific and the large epidemic of yellow fever in Africa.

    In 1974, there was the WHO-backed immunization program to vaccinate children worldwide against diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), tetanus, measles, polio and tuberculosis. Eradicating these diseases from children has yet to be realized.

    Sure, there have been some programs that have not met expectations, such as making primary healthcare the central function of a country's health system. This has not been realized.

    Nor was the safe motherhood program to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality by 50 percent by the year 2000 realized.

    Seventeen years ago, the WHO guided countries in successfully containing severe acute respiratory syndrome.

    It is not the WHO's responsibility to be the world's health policeman. Individual countries need to take responsibility for their actions and how they respond to outbreaks such as COVID-19.

    In its defense, the WHO was quick to react to the current outbreak. Let's not forget that the WHO cannot simply walk into a sovereign nation and take the lead role. There are protocols that need to be observed.

    For the WHO and China as well, the hardest part was trying to determine what they were dealing with in the first place.

    Much of what the WHO had learned during the SARS outbreak came into play. That included keeping information flowing to the global community and helping countries prepare for the rapid detection and response to cases, clusters and community transmission.

    It also needed to source and send medical supplies, and provide technical expertise and training where needed.

    The WHO does not have it easy. Just ask those working on vaccinating children against diseases such as whooping cough or measles, and the opposition it meets from the powerful anti-vaccination lobby, especially in wealthy, developed economies.

    The point is, if you take the WHO out of the world health picture, then what is left? Who will fill the void?

    Who will coordinate the current global fight against COVID-19 and other global campaigns on such vital issues as obesity and tobacco?

    The WHO performs a vital role in global health, particularly at this critical time. It needs to be quarantined from the vagaries of politics, allowing it to focus on the role it was originally intended for-the health of all people.

    Part of the WHO's charter reads: "The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest cooperation of individuals and states.… Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of disease, especially communicable disease, is a common danger."

    Good health is a fundamental right of every man, woman and child inhabiting this planet. Politics does have a place, but not in health.

    The writer is a China Daily correspondent based in Sydney.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    (愛妃視頻)国产无码中文字幕| av区无码字幕中文色| 国产无码网页在线观看| 日韩人妻无码精品专区| 久久影院午夜理论片无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳AV| 中文字幕乱码久久午夜| 久久AV高清无码| 中文字幕日本精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码久久人妻| 国产午夜精品无码| 中文字幕无码第1页| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 无码任你躁久久久久久| 变态SM天堂无码专区| 无码中文字幕av免费放dvd| 再看日本中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲乱码中文字幕综合| 爽到高潮无码视频在线观看| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES| 在线播放无码后入内射少妇| 亚洲av中文无码| 最近2019好看的中文字幕| 99久久超碰中文字幕伊人| 亚洲爆乳无码精品AAA片蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品无码成人| 久久久久亚洲AV无码麻豆| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 亚洲av无码片vr一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 最近免费中文字幕中文高清| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 久久亚洲精品中文字幕三区| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 精品久久久久中文字幕日本| 天堂最新版中文网| 乱人伦中文视频高清视频| 亚洲日韩AV一区二区三区中文 | 无码av人妻一区二区三区四区|