Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / Americas

    Social distancing works, but how long must it remain in place?

    By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2020-04-20 09:54
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A sign encouraging social distancing is pictured as Trystan LaBrasseur of Fresh Bucks unloads apple cider at the Ballard Farmers' Market which reopened Sunday with new safety measures as efforts continue to help slow the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Seattle, Washington, US on April 19, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

    Embracing the concepts of "flattening the curve" and "social distancing", the American public is wondering when life will go back to normal. But some experts say the physical distancing practice may need to remain in place for the next two years.

    For weeks, state and local governments across the US have closed businesses and mandated social distancing to cut off chains of the coronavirus' transmission. So far, 97 percent of the country's population is under stay-at-home orders.

    "It factors in importantly the physical distancing measures that are absolutely essential," said Jonathan Fielding, professor in the Schools of Public Health and Medicine at UCLA, of the fight against COVID-19. "And it's important that we keep everybody compliant with these measures if we don't want things to get worse."

    Experts say protective measures like social distancing are the key to "flatten the curve" of infection so that the total number of COVID-19 cases is spread over a longer term, preventing an influx of patients from overwhelming the healthcare system.

    While bracing for a surge of coronavirus cases, the hospital of the University of California San Francisco (USCF) has kept the caseloads low. The hospital's COVID-19 unit with 600 beds had only 20 patients, according to an NBC News report on April 11.

    The UCSF and its doctors took to social media to note that the new cases in San Francisco seemed to be flattening as a result of the city's early adoption of social distancing measures.

    Robert Wachter, chair of the Department of Medicine at UCSF, created a graphic and posted it on Twitter to illustrate what San Francisco and California have done right in the pandemic.

    According to the graphic, San Francisco had declared a public health emergency on Feb 26, before the first US death was reported on Feb 29 in Seattle.

    The city and six surrounding Bay Area counties announced a "shelter in place" order on March 16, the first of its kind in the US. Three days later, California ordered all residents to stay at home, the first US state to do so. New York went to "shelter at home" on March 23, four days later than California.

    The graphic indicates a wide difference in the death tolls of the two states. As of April 10, San Francisco and California had recorded 13 and 554 deaths, respectively, compared with 5,820 deaths in New York City and 7,844 deaths in New York state.

    The key to San Francisco's "lighter hit" includes big tech companies' early action to allow employees to work from home, then bold steps by elected leaders, and the "crucial part" — people following the guidance, said Wachter.

    Health experts say that the states that have taken social distancing seriously and early seem to be doing better than those that haven't.

    Another early adopter of social distancing measures was Washington state, the early epicenter of COVID-19 in the US. It has not seen the same spike as New York.

    Physical distancing strategy also seems to be working in hardest-hit New York state, as Governor Andrew Cuomo said this week: "The increase has slowed down; it flattens out for a period of time," he said.

    However, the latest Google community-mobility report analyzing location data from cell phones estimates that physical distancing has reduced national movement to retail and recreational locations by only 49 percent, with deep differentials between states that have implemented stay-at-home orders and those that have not.

    Arkansas shows only a 36 percent drop in retail and recreational behaviors, the lowest rate among all states, while Iowa has a 134 percent rise in park visitations, the highest rate in the country, according to the report.

    The two states and five others still refuse to issue statewide stay-at-home orders, despite pleas from Dr Anthony Fauci, the country's top infectious disease expert and a member of the Trump administration's coronavirus task force.

    "I don't understand why that's not happening," Fauci told CNN earlier this month, referring to the lack of stay-at-home orders in those states.

    The governors of the seven states, all of whom are Republican, have various reasons for why they have not joined their colleagues across the country to tell people to stay home.

    Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds insisted she has taken "significant steps" and criticized Fauci for "assuming that no action has been taken" in the state by "just looking at the map".

    Despite the outbreak that has infected nearly 450 workers at a pork plant in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Governor Kristi Noem has continually pushed back on the idea of a stay-at-home order.

    President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly downplayed the pandemic, said at Wednesday's daily news briefing that data suggested the country had passed the peak on new coronavirus infections.

    On April 16, he announced guidelines for reopening the economy in three phases and told the nation's governors they could decide when to follow the guidelines for their state economies.

    California Governor Gavin Newsom has his own criteria to relax the social distancing measures, such as a decline in hospitalization and expanded testing and hospital capacity.

    Asked about a timeline at Tuesday's news conference, Newsom said he would revisit the question in two weeks. "Let's not make the mistake of pulling the plug too early," he said.

    Acknowledging the economic burden that prolonged social distancing may impose, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health warn of "the potentially catastrophic burden" on the healthcare system if distancing measures are not implemented effectively or for long enough.

    "Intermittent distancing may be required into 2022 unless critical care capacity is increased substantially or a treatment or vaccine becomes available," the researchers said in a study published Tuesday in the journal Science.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲va中文字幕无码久久| 99久久无色码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码一区二区视频| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AWWW| 美丽姑娘免费观看在线观看中文版 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线a乱码日本中文字幕高清| 国产办公室秘书无码精品99| 久久AV高潮AV无码AV| 今天免费中文字幕视频| 中文字幕在线观看有码| Aⅴ精品无码无卡在线观看| 亚洲av无码不卡一区二区三区 | xx中文字幕乱偷avxx| 无码中文人妻视频2019| 亚洲无码日韩精品第一页| 91精品久久久久久无码| 国产乱人无码伦av在线a| 无码人妻AV一二区二区三区| 无码丰满熟妇juliaann与黑人| 日韩中文字幕在线播放| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文| 日韩一本之道一区中文字幕| 亚洲一级Av无码毛片久久精品| 久久久久无码中| 亚洲?v无码国产在丝袜线观看| 精品人妻无码专区中文字幕| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 91精品日韩人妻无码久久不卡| 成在线人免费无码高潮喷水| 国产成人无码18禁午夜福利p| 精品国产v无码大片在线观看| 精品成在人线AV无码免费看| 黄桃AV无码免费一区二区三区| 久久久久亚洲精品无码蜜桃 | 无码精品蜜桃一区二区三区WW| 变态SM天堂无码专区| 欧日韩国产无码专区| 制服丝袜人妻中文字幕在线| 炫硕日本一区二区三区综合区在线中文字幕 | 精品深夜AV无码一区二区|