Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / From the Press

    Will the European objective win out over the American one on Israel?

    By Guy Burton | CGTN | Updated: 2020-05-15 16:21
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    The handout photo by Israeli Government Press Office shows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (R) meets with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Jerusalem, on Oct. 18, 2019. /Xinhua

    Israel's new government began life on Thursday, a day after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the day before European Union foreign ministers were scheduled to meet.

    Looming large over both meetings is the question of Israel's annexation of those parts of the West Bank where its settlements and the 460,000 settlers who live in them are based.

    In the press conference between Netanyahu and Pompeo, the American secretary of state avoided making any public statements about the proposed annexation. Although Netanyahu didn't bring it up, it's likely that annexation was discussed behind closed doors and that Pompeo didn't discourage the Israelis.

    By contrast, several media outlets reported that some European governments are keen to send a strong message to Israel that it doesn't follow through on its plan, including a threat of sanctions.

    The contrasting messages sent by the Americans and the Europeans expose a deep rift in the Western approach to peace in the Middle East. Until recently, the two marched in lockstep with both supporting a two-state solution and the Oslo process of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians as the way to achieve this. As the principal sponsors of the process, they divided the labor, the Americans supporting negotiations and both providing financial assistance to the Palestinians to help build political institutions and support development.

    That unity has been under strain for some time though and especially under President Donald Trump. Although the US and Israel have long been close allies, Trump abandoned any pretense at balance between the two sides. At the end of his first year in office he moved the American embassy to Jerusalem and recognized it as Israel's capital. This went against the international consensus not to make any such move until a peace agreement was completed. At the same time, he cut American assistance to the Palestinians and the UN agencies which supported them.

    Then, at the end of January, Trump launched his peace plan for the Middle East. Netanyahu was delighted. Although it proposed two states, Palestinian sovereignty would be severely circumscribed: Jewish settlements would be absorbed into Israel and Israel would have direct control over the Jordan Valley and be able to undertake any measures which safeguarded its security at the expense of the Palestinians.

    The plan received little international support. The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, criticized the plan, reiterating the EU's commitment to a negotiated two-state solution. But he didn't speak for all member states, however. Several countries, including Hungary, the Czech Republic, Italy and Austria had doubts and rejected Borrell's common statement on the grounds that it was unbalanced and discouraged the Palestinians from negotiating.

    Those countries are likely to resist any moves for a strong response to Israel's annexation plans this week, which Borrell, France, Ireland, Sweden and Belgium will be pushing for. Among the options that may be on the table range from excluding Israel from participation in its Horizon research and development programme to suspending its Open Skies agreement which manages aviation between the two (and which the EU hasn't yet ratified) or the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which regulates trade and other relations between each.

    Given the likely resistance within the EU however, it's unlikely any statement coming out of the foreign ministers' meeting will be that severe. Furthermore, even if the EU could reach a consensus, any imposition of sanctions could be detrimental for others, like the Palestinians. Much of Europe's 1.1 to 1.36 billion-euro financial assistance to the Palestinians relies on Israel allowing them to enter and carry out their activities. If that was closed off, that would make it impossible for Europe to maintain its financial commitments to the Palestinian Authority, refugees and development projects.

    Netanyahu will therefore lose little sleep over what happens in Europe. Instead, he will be more concerned at the response in the US and possible political developments there.

    While Trump has been an especially attentive president, there's little certainty that he will remain president after January 2021. True, the elections in November are still far off and current attention is given over to the public health crisis generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. But his polling figures have consistently remained poor and could deteriorate further over the coming months.

    Within US Congress, fourteen Democrat senators have already signed a bill opposing unilateral annexation and calling for the two-state solution. Others are looking to press the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden to make a similar statement.

    Perhaps for that reason, the new Israeli government may conclude that it makes sense to complete the annexation plan sooner rather than later. Under the new government's coalition agreement, it may try and do that by the beginning of July.

    Should the new government enact, it will encounter a lukewarm public. According to Israel Democracy Institute's survey last month, just over half (52 percent) of Israeli Jews support the move, rising to just under three-quarters (71 percent) of those who identify on the political right.

    At the same time, there may yet be a twist in the tail. Only a third of Israeli Jews think that annexation will happen this year, suggesting a degree of skepticism at current plans and their knowledge of Netanyahu. If that does turn out to be the case, then it will be the European objective that wins out over the American one, and despite its relatively weaker position and cooler relations with Israel than those under Trump.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码中文字幕乱在线观看| 亚洲日韩欧美国产中文| 青娱乐在线国产中文字幕免費資訊| 亚洲AV无码欧洲AV无码网站| 久久超乳爆乳中文字幕| 国产精品无码AV一区二区三区| AV色欲无码人妻中文字幕| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲毛片网址在线观看中文字幕 | 最好看的中文字幕2019免费| 18禁黄无码高潮喷水乱伦 | 中文字幕在线免费看线人| 中文字幕亚洲码在线| 国产激情无码视频在线播放性色| 中文字幕AV中文字无码亚 | 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕14页影音先锋| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码一二三区| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费| 国产亚洲3p无码一区二区| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区四区| 亚洲中文字幕丝袜制服一区| 日本乱中文字幕系列| 暖暖日本免费中文字幕| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 一本大道久久东京热无码AV| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 亚洲精品无码鲁网中文电影| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳AV| 精品多人p群无码| 中文字幕丰满乱孑伦无码专区| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码人妻| 亚洲中文字幕不卡无码| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲AV综合色区无码另类小说| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码久久| 亚洲AV无码精品色午夜在线观看| 亚洲AV人无码激艳猛片| 人妻丰满熟妇无码区免费| 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看|