Critics target new visa restrictions in US

    By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2020-07-15 08:59
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Harvard University, which with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is suing the US government over the new visa policy. MADDIE MEYER/GETTY IMAGES/AFP

    Administration urged to adopt talent-oriented immigration policies

    For more than a year, Jack Ling, a graduate student at the University of Southern California, has been stuck in limbo trying to renew his visa.

    Since submitting additional documents to the US consulate in Shanghai in March, he has not heard back.

    He has had to delay his plan to return to the United States to complete his studies in materials engineering for another semester, as the university has decided to move to online classes for the fall term due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    But even if he were to obtain a visa and return to the country, he faces another obstacle.

    On July 6, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, announced that students on F1 and M1 visas for academic and vocational study may not remain in the country if they take a full online-only course load for the fall semester.

    Under the new rule, the US State Department will not issue visas to students enrolled in schools that operate under an online-only course model, and US Customs and Border Protection will not allow such students to enter the country.

    Ling expected to graduate this year, but is now not sure if he can complete his degree through remote learning.

    Julie Pearl, CEO of the Pearl Law Group in San Francisco, said the ICE directive pressures US universities to reopen, despite their concerns for health and safety as the number of COVID-19 cases continues to rise around the country. The decision shows a lack of humanity, she said.

    "ICE is needlessly pulling the rug from under gifted students who have nowhere else to go at such short notice, and no control over whether their universities move to 100 percent online courses," she said. "While many top universities are trying to accommodate them with some physical classes, they cannot compel faculty nor students to take health risks."

    According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, which is tracking the reopening plans of nearly 1,100 colleges and universities, about 8 percent of the institutions are offering online courses only, including the University of Southern California and Harvard University.

    Harvard, where overseas students comprise more than 20 percent of the intake, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with foreign undergraduates account for nearly 30 percent of the student body, are suing the US government in an attempt to block the new regulation.

    The state of California, the University of California system and Johns Hopkins University have filed similar lawsuits.

    The institutions claim the regulation is "arbitrary and capricious"-arguing that the agency is not considering the health of students, faculty and staff members-and has not taken into account the "reality "of the pandemic continuing.

    About 200 higher education institutions have filed an amicus brief opposing the new policy. Such a brief may be filed with an appellate court, including a supreme court, by a party not involved with a current case, but in support of one side or another on the legal issue involved.

    Although ICE suggests that to comply with the legal requirements of the new regulation overseas students can transfer to a school with physical instruction, college admission experts said this is not workable.

    Elizabeth Venturini, an international college admissions expert in California, said, "It is not feasible for most students. International families try to make the best college decision based on academic, social and financial fit. It is critical to get it right the first time, rather than try to get another degree because the first one didn't work out."

    She added that switching schools can mean attending one that does not have a well-known program or the right degree, loss of an internship, inability to transfer class credits and a longer time to graduate.

    "Also, the school may not be the right social fit in terms of student demographics, location, interests or culture. It's an ivy-covered jungle with student transfer rates, transfer application requirements and deadlines."

    Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, which represents more than 1,800 college and university leaders, said the policy does not consider the global travel ban during the pandemic. This means a student may be unable to return to a country that has closed its borders if his or her school reopens physical classes and then switches to remote instruction midway through the fall semester.

    US visa requirements typically do not allow international students to take more than one course-or three credits-online each semester, but those requirements were relaxed earlier this year when the pandemic forced colleges nationwide to switch to virtual instruction.

    On July 2, the American Council on Education and 38 other groups wrote to the US State Department and the Department of Homeland Security, seeking flexibility into the next academic year, only to receive what Mitchell described as "horrifying "guidance four days later.

    "At a time when institutions are doing everything they can to help reopen our country, we need flexibility, not a big step in the wrong direction. Iron-clad federal rules are not the answer at this time of great uncertainty," Mitchell said.

    1 2 3 Next   >>|
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    一本色道无码不卡在线观看| 精品人妻V?出轨中文字幕 | 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| (愛妃視頻)国产无码中文字幕 | 中文字幕免费在线| 国产成人无码免费看片软件| 中文午夜乱理片无码| 中文字幕毛片| 国产精品无码素人福利| 最近中文国语字幕在线播放| 午夜亚洲av永久无码精品| 中文国产成人精品久久亚洲精品AⅤ无码精品 | 国产AV无码专区亚洲Av| 伊人久久无码中文字幕| 国产av无码专区亚洲国产精品 | 免费无码毛片一区二区APP| 亚洲中文字幕无码一区| 亚洲 无码 在线 专区| 高清无码在线视频| av区无码字幕中文色| 人妻少妇精品无码专区二区| 无码一区二区三区| 最好看的中文字幕2019免费| 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看 | A级毛片无码久久精品免费| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区系列| 亚洲.欧美.中文字幕在线观看| 911国产免费无码专区| 国产AV巨作情欲放纵无码| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久| 中文字幕日本高清| 最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国| 天堂中文在线最新版| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 熟妇人妻中文a∨无码| 日本阿v网站在线观看中文| 国产中文欧美日韩在线| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线观看| 无码丰满熟妇juliaann与黑人| 日本中文字幕在线|