Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Editorials

    Japan's cost-cutting water plan: China Daily editorial

    chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-04-13 19:52
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    An aerial view shows the storage tanks for treated water at the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, Japan Feb 13, 2021, in this photo taken by Kyodo. [Photo/Agencies]

    Citing multiple professional authorities, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed the country's "grave concern" over the Japanese government's decision on Tuesday to discharge radioactive water from the damaged Fukushima nuclear plant into the sea.

    Speaking from the perspective of a close neighbor and stakeholder, the ministry said Tokyo's unilateral decision, "before exhausting all safe ways of disposal and without fully consulting with neighboring countries and the international community", was "highly irresponsible".

    Warning Tokyo of further Chinese reactions, it strongly urged it to "refrain from wantonly discharging the wastewater before reaching consensus with all stakeholders and the International Atomic Energy Agency through full consultations".

    How to dispose of the radioactive wastewater may appear to be entirely a domestic decision to policymakers in Tokyo. But, as the Chinese Foreign Ministry said, it is "not merely a domestic issue for Japan", because discharging the contaminated water into the sea, even after filtering and diluting it, will almost inevitably result in collateral damage for neighboring countries, even those on the other side of the Pacific Ocean.

    Although Japan claims that the water disposal method it chose is both technically feasible and in line with international practice, as controlled water discharges into the sea are routinely used by operating nuclear power plants, the large volume of water at the Fukushima plant is unprecedented.

    The Chinese Foreign Ministry referenced an earlier German study which conducted simulations showing that radioactive materials in water released from Fukushima could spread to most of the Pacific within 57 days, and would be found in all the oceans in a decade. Even if the density of hazardous elements in the discharge is reduced to "safe" levels through filtering and diluting as the Japanese government claims, the impacts of their long-term accumulation remain unknown at this point. After all, some of the elements are expected to remain active and harmful for thousands of years.

    The truth is, even before such substantial discharge, Japanese authorities have repeatedly monitored high doses of radioactive elements in fish caught in the vicinity of the Fukushima nuclear plant far exceeding Japanese safety levels.

    Given the strong ocean currents near Fukushima, it is indeed hard to tell what the Japanese government's decision means to the global marine environment. Considering the sensitivity of the issue, the only sensible, responsible way is for Japan to approach the matter on the basis of proper consultation with regional stakeholders in an open and transparent way. Doubts concerning the Japanese government's claims about the safety of the water after treatment are natural given that the plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company admitted in 2018 that it had not filtered all dangerous materials out of the water, despite asserting for years that it had.

    China is not the only country to have raised concerns about Japan's plan. The Republic of Korea has also expressed its opposition to the move. And the list will likely become longer, as despite the IAEA saying that its cooperation and presence will help build confidence that the water disposal will be carried out without an adverse impact on human health and the environment, few people believe that will be the case, and there are many who doubt the Japanese government will act above board.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码专区狠狠躁躁天天躁| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 国产中文字幕乱人伦在线观看| 国产精品xxxx国产喷水亚洲国产精品无码久久一区 | 无码人妻精品一区二区三区在线 | 国产aⅴ无码专区亚洲av| 一二三四在线播放免费观看中文版视频 | 办公室丝袜激情无码播放| 精品无码一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品无码激情AV| 久久精品无码一区二区无码| 国产网红主播无码精品| 大蕉久久伊人中文字幕| 亚洲日本va中文字幕久久| 人妻一区二区三区无码精品一区| 日韩AV无码久久一区二区| 中国无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪软件| 最近2019中文字幕免费直播| 人妻中文无码久热丝袜| 亚洲av无码成人精品区在线播放| 国产精品无码无卡在线播放| 亚洲AV无码日韩AV无码导航| 久久AV高潮AV无码AV| 中文无码精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 少妇人妻综合久久中文字幕| 亚洲 另类 无码 在线| 久久久久无码国产精品不卡| 国产精品多人p群无码| 国产午夜无码精品免费看 | 6080YYY午夜理论片中无码| 久久99精品久久久久久hb无码| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES | 国产真人无码作爱视频免费| 国产精品无码久久久久久| 无码av免费一区二区三区试看 | 日韩精品中文字幕无码一区| 四虎成人精品无码|