Things to know about all the lies on Xinjiang: How have they come about?

    China Watch Institute, China Daily | Updated: 2021-04-28 12:45
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Emin (2nd L), a resident of Uygur ethnic group, chats with his neighbors in Tacheng city, Northwest China's Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, April 2, 2020. [Photo/Xinhua]

    VII. The "First Independent Report" on Xinjiang which was widely reported in Western media actually came from an institution funded by a sham university.

    ◆In March 2021, the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy, a self-styled think tank, published the so-called "first independent report" on Xinjiang. The report claims that China has breached "each and every act" of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in its treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjinag. The report and the Institute received extensive coverage by mainstream media outlets such as CNN, The Guardian and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

    ◆Founded in 2019 and based in Washington D.C., the Newlines Institute purportedly aims to "enhance US foreign policy based on a deep understanding of the geopolitics of the different regions of the world and their value systems". Its founder and president once served as a member of the advisory board for the US military's Africa Command. Anti-China scholar Adrian Zenz is also on its team.

    ◆Tom Fowdy, an Oxford graduate and East Asia specialist, revealed in Chollima Report, a website he runs, that the Newlines Institute is actually a front for the Institute of Islamic Thought, an Islamist neo-conservative organization in the US linked to Egypt's Muslim brotherhood, whose members have pleaded guilty to sponsoring terrorism.

    ◆In April 2021, Thore Vestby, former mayor of Norway’s Frogn municipality, worked with Dutch and Danish scholars and published a special paper titled “The Xinjiang Genocide Determination As Agenda” through the Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research. The special paper points out that the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy is highly consistent with the official position of the United States. The institute’s members who drafted the Xinjiang-related report are anti-communists and anti-China elements who have long been influenced by Christian fundamentalism and extreme conservatism, and the institute’s independence is suspicious. The timing of formulating and releasing of the report highly coincides with the time when the then US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused China of "genocide" in Xinjiang. The report blindly backs up Pompeo, but does not give any valuable evidence; there is an obvious bias in the selection of original materials, and it quotes a large number of falsified data and misinterpreted information; a large number of valuable, real information is deliberately ignored by the writers. The report clearly supports the US adopting a hardline foreign policy toward China as well as the use of human rights issues to contain and suppress China, which is seriously inconsistent with the position of the “Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy” as a neutral academic institution to seek mutual understanding and peace. The mainstream media in the West have collectively ignored the serious loopholes in the report and rushed to cite it without verification, reflecting that the military industry-media-think tank interest consortium in the United States enjoys a great power, and that the relevant institutions have been completely reduced to accomplices of interest groups.

    ◆The Newlines Institute is funded by Fairfax University of America (FXUA), an unaccredited sham university formerly known as Virginia International University. In 2019, state regulators of Virginia found the academic quality and rigor of FXUA's online education "patently deficient" and the university's certificate to operate was almost revoked. Data from the US Department of Education show that between 2020 and 2021, the university has 153 registered students, and its official Twitter account has only 13 followers.

    ◆The advisory board of the FXUA is composed of heads of military contractors. The Consolidated Analysis Centers Incorporated (CACI), which was involved in the Abu Ghraib prison incident in Iraq, is one of them.

    ◆According to a report carried by Xinhuanet in 2007, lawyers from the US Center for Constitutional Rights note that a group of more than 250 former Iraqi prisoners filed a lawsuit against CACI for torture during interrogation in Iraq.

    https://thegrayzone.com/2021/03/17/report-uyghur-genocide-sham-university-neocon-punish-china

    https://transnational.live/2021/04/27/%f0%9f%9f%a5-breaking-the-xinjiang-genocide-determination-as-agenda/

    |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next   >>|
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩人妻无码精品一专区| 亚洲乱码中文字幕手机在线| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线视频| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区| 无码人妻少妇色欲AV一区二区| 最近2019年中文字幕一页| 无码H肉动漫在线观看| 亚洲成A人片在线观看中文| 中文字幕无码久久久| 无码无套少妇毛多18p| 欧美日韩中文字幕在线观看| 日本中文字幕一区二区有码在线| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区漫画| 国产亚洲美日韩AV中文字幕无码成人 | 中文字幕有码无码AV| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口 | 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 无码成人一区二区| 国产成人无码精品久久久性色| 亚洲欧美日韩中文播放| 西西午夜无码大胆啪啪国模| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕日产乱码高清app| 日韩欧精品无码视频无删节| 一本一道色欲综合网中文字幕| 18禁网站免费无遮挡无码中文| 日本中文字幕电影| 亚洲精品无码专区久久同性男| 久久久久亚洲av无码专区| 亚洲无码在线播放| 永久免费av无码网站yy| 无码精品A∨在线观看免费| 欧美无乱码久久久免费午夜一区二区三区中文字幕 | 综合无码一区二区三区| 久久久久亚洲av成人无码电影| 爆操夜夜操天天操狠操中文| 九九久久精品无码专区| 蜜臀AV无码国产精品色午夜麻豆| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区三区| (愛妃視頻)国产无码中文字幕|