Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / World Watch

    WHO should resist politics in COVID-19 origin tracing

    By Adhere Cavince | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-08-05 08:58
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A flag is pictured outside a building of the World Health Organization during an executive board meeting on update on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in Geneva, Switzerland, April 6, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

    Nearly a year and half after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, efforts to contain the virus remain challenged. Many countries and territories around the world have encountered new and more deadly variants, deferring hopes for health stability and economic recovery.

    At the same time, there appears to be a buildup of political acts by some countries, threatening the gains made in both pandemic origin tracing and response.

    For four weeks, WHO experts and their Chinese counterparts were in Wuhan, Hubei province, the city that first reported the virus in China. The team then made recommendations and conclusions on what might have transpired, which logically would have provided a backdrop for further investigations.

    However, a new plan by the WHO Secretariat to abandon those earlier outcomes of the joint study, as the WHO launches the second phase of the origin tracing investigation, has elicited strong reactions from the international community. Several questions are being raised regarding the impartiality, integrity and utility of the WHO move.

    For instance, there is no scientific basis for the WHO to discount the outcomes of the joint study that was conducted by its own experts. Second, the unilateral decision by the global health body to draw up a new plan without due consultation of member states flies in the face of established rules of procedure governing execution of its mandate. Also of concern is the continuity of the source tracing, since the WHO intends to replace the experts who were involved in the Wuhan mission.

    These worries have nudged more than 60 countries to write to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, warning against politicization of COVID-19 source tracing, since it would have huge implications for a successful international response against the pandemic.

    As a coordinating agency, the WHO should be at the forefront of building consensus in tackling global health challenges. It can only achieve this through unflinching pursuit of professionalism, independence and global good.

    Besides COVID-19 source tracing, the global health body has an even more urgent responsibility: galvanizing international consensus for effective response against the pandemic. So far, developing economies have fallen behind, with a minuscule supply of vaccines, despite the widely appreciated fact that vaccines remain the most sustainable way out of the pandemic.

    According to the WHO, out of the 3.5 billion vaccine doses administered around the world, 75 percent have gone to just 10 rich countries.

    In the United States, nearly 50 percent of the population has been fully vaccinated, compared with around 2 percent in Africa. A country like the Democratic Republic of Congo has only administered 0.08 vaccines per 100 individuals, showing just how dire the situation is on the continent.

    While rich countries offer their populations enticements to get vaccinated, people in low income economies are more willing to receive the inoculations. But the hoarding and use of vaccines to achieve political ends has derailed an equitable global response as more problematic variants take root.

    A new study by the WHO and partners indicates that, had vaccine inequity been addressed, up to $38 billion could have been added to poorer nations' GDP forecast for 2021. It is these unfortunate realities that make poor countries worry about the WHO's ability to help affected countries climb out of the pandemic vortex.

    The global health body should therefore focus its energies on providing solutions to the most pressing challenges, instead of falling victim to international politics. Diversionary tactics will only delay the global recovery from the health and economic crises.

    The writer is a Kenya-based researcher of international relations with a focus on China-Africa ties.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    国产成人无码免费网站| 久久久久无码精品国产app| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看| 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫| 欧美日韩国产中文高清视频| 亚欧免费无码aⅴ在线观看| 手机永久无码国产AV毛片| 69ZXX少妇内射无码| 午夜亚洲AV日韩AV无码大全| 最近2019中文字幕免费大全5| 亚洲av无码成人精品国产| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 在人线AV无码免费高潮喷水| 国产成人无码久久久精品一| 综合无码一区二区三区| YY111111少妇无码理论片| 无码人妻一区二区三区兔费| 无码毛片AAA在线| 精品人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区| 无码一区二区三区免费| 欧洲精品无码一区二区三区在线播放| 亚洲AV无码专区国产乱码4SE| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口| 中文字幕av无码一区二区三区电影 | 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影 | 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇 | 国产精品免费无遮挡无码永久视频 | 中文字幕精品无码一区二区 | 人妻少妇精品中文字幕AV| 无码永久免费AV网站| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽| 日本无码色情三级播放| 婷婷四虎东京热无码群交双飞视频 | 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 精品成在人线AV无码免费看| 国产三级无码内射在线看| 播放亚洲男人永久无码天堂 | 亚洲AV中文无码字幕色三| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕|