Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / World Watch

    WHO should resist politics in COVID-19 origin tracing

    By Adhere Cavince | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-08-05 08:58
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A flag is pictured outside a building of the World Health Organization during an executive board meeting on update on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in Geneva, Switzerland, April 6, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

    Nearly a year and half after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, efforts to contain the virus remain challenged. Many countries and territories around the world have encountered new and more deadly variants, deferring hopes for health stability and economic recovery.

    At the same time, there appears to be a buildup of political acts by some countries, threatening the gains made in both pandemic origin tracing and response.

    For four weeks, WHO experts and their Chinese counterparts were in Wuhan, Hubei province, the city that first reported the virus in China. The team then made recommendations and conclusions on what might have transpired, which logically would have provided a backdrop for further investigations.

    However, a new plan by the WHO Secretariat to abandon those earlier outcomes of the joint study, as the WHO launches the second phase of the origin tracing investigation, has elicited strong reactions from the international community. Several questions are being raised regarding the impartiality, integrity and utility of the WHO move.

    For instance, there is no scientific basis for the WHO to discount the outcomes of the joint study that was conducted by its own experts. Second, the unilateral decision by the global health body to draw up a new plan without due consultation of member states flies in the face of established rules of procedure governing execution of its mandate. Also of concern is the continuity of the source tracing, since the WHO intends to replace the experts who were involved in the Wuhan mission.

    These worries have nudged more than 60 countries to write to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, warning against politicization of COVID-19 source tracing, since it would have huge implications for a successful international response against the pandemic.

    As a coordinating agency, the WHO should be at the forefront of building consensus in tackling global health challenges. It can only achieve this through unflinching pursuit of professionalism, independence and global good.

    Besides COVID-19 source tracing, the global health body has an even more urgent responsibility: galvanizing international consensus for effective response against the pandemic. So far, developing economies have fallen behind, with a minuscule supply of vaccines, despite the widely appreciated fact that vaccines remain the most sustainable way out of the pandemic.

    According to the WHO, out of the 3.5 billion vaccine doses administered around the world, 75 percent have gone to just 10 rich countries.

    In the United States, nearly 50 percent of the population has been fully vaccinated, compared with around 2 percent in Africa. A country like the Democratic Republic of Congo has only administered 0.08 vaccines per 100 individuals, showing just how dire the situation is on the continent.

    While rich countries offer their populations enticements to get vaccinated, people in low income economies are more willing to receive the inoculations. But the hoarding and use of vaccines to achieve political ends has derailed an equitable global response as more problematic variants take root.

    A new study by the WHO and partners indicates that, had vaccine inequity been addressed, up to $38 billion could have been added to poorer nations' GDP forecast for 2021. It is these unfortunate realities that make poor countries worry about the WHO's ability to help affected countries climb out of the pandemic vortex.

    The global health body should therefore focus its energies on providing solutions to the most pressing challenges, instead of falling victim to international politics. Diversionary tactics will only delay the global recovery from the health and economic crises.

    The writer is a Kenya-based researcher of international relations with a focus on China-Africa ties.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 国产在线无码不卡影视影院| 国产在线无码不卡影视影院| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| 丝袜熟女国偷自产中文字幕亚洲| 日韩精品无码中文字幕一区二区| 日韩欧美中文字幕一字不卡| 亚洲不卡中文字幕无码| 波多野结衣亚洲AV无码无在线观看| 最新中文字幕AV无码不卡| 好看的中文字幕二区高清在线观看 | 伊人久久大香线蕉无码麻豆| 无码137片内射在线影院| 无码av人妻一区二区三区四区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 久久av高潮av无码av喷吹| 久久亚洲精品无码AV红樱桃| 精品无码久久久久国产动漫3d| 波多野结衣在线中文| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区| 97无码免费人妻超| AV无码久久久久不卡蜜桃| 国产AV无码专区亚洲A∨毛片| 色情无码WWW视频无码区小黄鸭| 亚洲成AV人片在线播放无码| 成人无码网WWW在线观看| 中文字幕丰满乱子伦无码专区| 久久精品亚洲AV久久久无码| 久久无码国产专区精品| 伊人久久无码中文字幕| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆| 无码午夜成人1000部免费视频| 亚洲成AV人片在线观看无码| 十八禁无码免费网站| 精品亚洲A∨无码一区二区三区 | 亚洲AV永久纯肉无码精品动漫| 东京热av人妻无码专区| 亚洲韩国精品无码一区二区三区| 特级无码毛片免费视频尤物|