Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    World
    Home / World / Americas

    Biden fails to sway critics on Afghan pullout

    By HENG WEILI in New York and ZHAO HUANXIN in Washington | China Daily | Updated: 2021-08-18 09:24
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    US President Joe Biden delivers remarks on the crisis in Afghanistan during a speech in the East Room at the White House in Washington on August 16, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

    Kabul chaos leaves US president with tough defense of hasty troop withdrawal

    US President Joe Biden made a forceful defense on Monday of the United States' troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, saying that US soldiers should not be fighting in a war in which Afghans themselves won't engage wholeheartedly. But that didn't wash with many critics of an exit that brought an ignominious end to the 20-year engagement.

    The president's words came after images of the chaos at Kabul's airport were beamed around the world, with desperate Afghans trying to latch on to US military planes as the Taliban took control of the country. Several who resorted to that action fell to their death.

    "The truth is, this did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated," Biden said. "Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan military collapsed, sometimes without trying to fight.

    "If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that ending US military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision."

    But on Capitol Hill, at least one member of the president's party was troubled by the implications of what he saw.

    "We didn't need to be in this position; we didn't need to be seeing these scenes at Kabul airport with our Afghan friends climbing a C-17," Representative Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat and former Army Ranger who served in Afghanistan, told The New York Times.

    Biden, in defense of his accelerated withdrawal of US troops, said the original mission of counterterrorism had morphed into nation-building and counterinsurgency.

    "Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation-building. It was never supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy. Our only vital national interest in Afghanistan remains today what it has always been: preventing a terrorist attack on (the) American homeland," the president said during the 18-minute address at the White House.

    Biden said that when he took office in January, he inherited a deal that his predecessor Donald Trump had negotiated with the Taliban for US forces to pull out by May 1, 2021.

    Trump, who traded accusations on Afghanistan with Biden on Saturday, said on Monday: "It's not that we left Afghanistan. It's the grossly incompetent way we left!"

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican, called the desperate scenes in the Afghan capital "the embarrassment of a superpower laid low".

    German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said on Tuesday that pictures of masses of people trying to flee Kabul are shameful for Western nations, Reuters reported.

    Policy experts expressed divergent views on the fallout of the US withdrawal.

    Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote that the "hasty and poorly planned "withdrawal may not provide sufficient time to evacuate Afghans who worked with the US and Afghan governments.

    "Beyond the local consequences, the grim aftermath of America's strategic and moral failure will reinforce questions about US reliability among friends and foes far and wide," he wrote on the council's website.

    Anthony Cordesman, strategy chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that Biden "made a strong case-that no matter how long we stayed, we couldn't achieve the objective of somehow creating an effective government and democracy".

    Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, noted that being an advocate of US military interventions "apparently means never having to say you're sorry, no matter how obvious and severe the blunders".

    "But continuing to risk the lives of US troops and pour billions of taxpayer dollars down the drain for decades to come in the forlorn hope that we can transform Afghanistan into a viable Western-style democracy is neither a realistic nor a moral option," Carpenter wrote in an article titled Why Afghanistan Abruptly Collapsed.

    "Vietnam and Afghanistan (along with Iraq, Libya, Syria, and several other countries) are places in which US meddling has made matters worse rather than better."

    Lies, delusions

    Justin Logan, also a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, notes that US policy in Afghanistan and the government's message to citizens about it have been built on lies and delusions. "The American people, having happily swallowed those lies, are now aghast," he wrote on Monday.

    Adam Brandon, president of FreedomWorks, a conservative group, said: "President Biden is not alone in bearing blame for the events unfolding in Afghanistan. The senior military and intelligence officials, who for years gave an inaccurate picture of the realities on the ground to Congress, must also be held responsible."

    But Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said: "The only thing he (Biden) seemed to concede in terms of his responsibility was the fact that they had underestimated the speed at which the Taliban took territory and ultimately took Kabul."

    In a webinar hosted by Code Pink on Monday, Zaher Wahab, an Afghan-American scholar, said: "We have to ask the question: Why did the Afghan military fail, given all the training, the technology, the expenses? ... It shows the failure of the American intelligence, the American military, the American policy, and the American diplomacy.

    "First, it (the US) should never have attacked Afghanistan. It was illegitimate, illegal, immoral, inhuman. When it did, it should have left as soon as the Taliban had been dislodged. ... Why it stayed, we know, because it's called imperialism by a different name."

    Lia Zhu in San Francisco and agencies contributed to this story.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    亚洲一区AV无码少妇电影☆| 人妻无码中文久久久久专区| 精品久久久久久久久中文字幕| 无码少妇一区二区性色AV| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕 | 97碰碰碰人妻视频无码| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜| 天天爽亚洲中文字幕| 丰满少妇人妻无码| 亚洲AV无码国产精品麻豆天美| 中文字幕在线观看日本| 亚洲中文久久精品无码| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 色综合AV综合无码综合网站| 国产精品99久久久精品无码| 色综合久久中文字幕综合网| 中文字幕AV一区中文字幕天堂| 亚洲av无码不卡私人影院| 草草久久久无码国产专区| 久久久久亚洲AV无码网站| 无码AV天堂一区二区三区| 无码少妇一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人精品无码区在线| 人妻系列AV无码专区| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 熟妇女人妻丰满少妇中文字幕| 台湾佬中文娱乐中文| 久久久中文字幕日本| 亚洲欧美中文日韩V在线观看| 国产一区三区二区中文在线 | 最近中文字幕免费2019| 91天日语中文字幕在线观看 | 成人无码a级毛片免费| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码一区二区三区| 日本久久中文字幕| 免费看成人AA片无码视频羞羞网| 最近更新中文字幕第一页| 中文字幕在线观看国产| 一本一道av中文字幕无码| 无码中文字幕av免费放dvd| 日韩AV片无码一区二区不卡电影|