Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Business
    Home / Business / Policies

    Individuals key role in achieving common prosperity

    By Tang Min | China Daily | Updated: 2021-11-15 09:36
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Customers select flowers at a flower planting base in Heyang town of Nanhe district in Xingtai, North China's Hebei province, Nov 1, 2021. [Photo/Xinhua]

    Experts agree that common prosperity is an essential requirement of socialism and an important feature of Chinese-style modernization. They also said the country should promote common prosperity alongside high-quality development. This has significant meaning for China in blazing the right trail and making specific measures for economic and social development in the next chapter of growth.

    I'd like to talk about common prosperity from three perspectives: How large is the current income gap in China? What misunderstandings does the public have during the nation's efforts to push for common prosperity and how to overcome these misunderstandings? How should the country strengthen the role of the tertiary distribution in promoting common prosperity?

    According to estimates of the National Bureau of Statistics, the Gini coefficient in China increased from 0.389 in 1995 to around 0.46 currently.

    As an indicator measuring income inequality among individuals, the Gini coefficient is based on the comparison of cumulative proportions of the population against cumulative proportions of income they receive. It ranges between 0 in the case of perfect equality and 1 in the case of extreme inequality, said the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    According to World Bank estimates, which are based on an internationally comparable method, China's Gini index was 38.5 in 2016, higher than many countries', including Germany (31.9) and the Republic of Korea (31.4).

    World Bank data showed that based on the above comparison, China's income gap is relatively large.

    Many people are concerned that reducing the income gap may dampen entrepreneurial enthusiasm for investment and innovation. However, we can see from World Bank data that many countries, such as Germany, Japan, Switzerland and the Netherlands, have highly developed industries and commerce as well as frontier innovation, but the income gap among their citizens is not so onerous. It can be seen that a small income gap does not necessarily lead to a lack of motivation for investment and innovation among business owners.

    If we look at China's inequality in terms of assets, we'll find that the proportion of assets of the country's high-asset group-10 percent of the total population-in total assets of Chinese residents increased from 40 percent in 1978 to more than 60 percent in 2015. Meanwhile, the proportion of assets of the low-asset group-50 percent of the total population-dropped from about 17 percent to 8 percent over the same period. The other two features of the income gap are regional and urban-rural differences. The real situation shows us the necessity and urgency of promoting common prosperity.

    At the 10th meeting of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs on Aug 17, Chinese leaders called for efforts to promote common prosperity in the pursuit of high-quality development and to make basic institutional arrangements on income distribution, featuring coordinated primary distribution, redistribution and tertiary distribution.

    The concept known as the three distributions was first introduced by Li Yining, a prominent Chinese economist, in the 1990s.

    The primary distribution refers to the distribution of wages, profits, etc, carried out by the market in accordance with the principle of efficiency. The redistribution is carried out by the government through taxation and social security expenditures, taking into account the principles of fairness and efficiency while focusing on the principle of fairness. The tertiary distribution taps enterprises and individuals to redistribute their wealth through voluntary donations.

    Speaking of the primary distribution, the proportion of labor incomes in total personal incomes has kept falling since 2009, while that of property incomes has increased in China.

    Although the primary distribution is mainly aimed at pursuing efficiency, the nation could still make more efforts to raise the minimum wage and establish rational institutions to bring about salary increases.

    We learned from international experience that income distribution usually starts to improve when labor shortages occur. As China has entered into a phase of labor shortages, we have seen a fairly rapid salary increase, and it is necessary to guide the income distribution into a virtuous cycle.

    1 2 Next   >>|
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    CLOSE
     
    欧美日韩中文字幕久久久不卡| 亚洲av永久无码精品国产精品| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 精品欧洲AV无码一区二区男男| 久久e热在这里只有国产中文精品99 | а天堂8中文最新版在线官网| 日韩AV无码中文无码不卡电影| 久久亚洲2019中文字幕| 日韩精品人妻一区二区中文八零| 日韩精品无码久久久久久| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99性 | 国产亚洲精品无码专区| 亚洲爆乳无码专区| 无码夫の前で人妻を侵犯| 无码专区中文字幕无码| 亚洲av无码国产精品色在线看不卡| 亚洲ⅴ国产v天堂a无码二区| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 最近中文字幕2019视频1| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 中文无码喷潮在线播放| 免费a级毛片无码| 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本| 国产品无码一区二区三区在线蜜桃 | 中文字幕有码无码AV| 免费无码H肉动漫在线观看麻豆| 精品人妻无码专区中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲精品| 一区二区中文字幕 | 久久久久av无码免费网| 中文字幕国产| 久久精品亚洲AV久久久无码| 无码成人精品区在线观看| 中文字幕人妻在线视频不卡乱码 | 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网址| 亚洲欧洲无码AV电影在线观看| 一本色道久久HEZYO无码| 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱子伦| 人妻无码视频一区二区三区| 91精品久久久久久无码|