Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

    US support for water discharge plan could hurt itself

    By Wang Hanling | China Daily | Updated: 2021-12-28 07:58
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    An aerial view shows the storage tanks for treated water at the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Feb 13, 2021. [Photo/Agencies]

    The Japanese government insists on discharging nuclear contaminated water from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the sea ignoring the opposition of many countries including China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, Russia and South Pacific island states. On Friday Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority officially started to review a plan for discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea.

    Yet despite the international community's opposition, the US has supported the Japanese government's decision. For example, in April US Secretary of State Antony Blinken tweeted after the Japanese government's decision to discharge the radioactive water into the sea, saying: "We thank Japan for its transparent efforts in its decision to dispose of the treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi site."

    As for the US State Department, it said: "In this unique and challenging situation, Japan has weighed the options and effects, has been transparent about its decisions, and appears to have adopted an approach in accordance with globally accepted nuclear safety standards."

    The US, in supporting Japan, one of its principal allies, has ignored facts and scientific research, violated international law, and turned a blind eye to the irreversible damage the discharge of radioactive water would cause to the marine environment.

    First, authoritative scientific research shows the discharge of radioactive water into the sea will have a devastating impact on not only the marine environment but also humans. There are three main sources of radioactive water from the Fukushima plant: the original coolant in the reactor, the water pumped into the plant to cool the reactor core after the accident triggered by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, and the massive amount of groundwater and rainwater that infiltrated the reactor.

    Even Fukushima plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company has admitted that, unlike other radioactive elements in nuclear water, "tritium" cannot be removed from the nuclear contaminated water. So no matter how well the Japanese authorities try, the nuclear contaminated water will remain radioactive.

    According to a report of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, the discharge of nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima plant will have a devastating impact on the marine environment, food safety and human health.

    Also, a study by the Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel in Germany shows that the coast off Fukushima has one of the strongest currents in the world, and as a result, within 57 days from the day of discharge, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean, and three years later, the coasts of western United States and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. And within 10 years, the nuclear contamination will spread around the world.

    Also, nuclear experts from Greenpeace have said carbon-14 in the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water will remain at dangerous levels for thousands of years and could cause genetic damage to humans and other species.

    All this show the discharge of Fukushima nuclear contaminated water is not just a domestic issue of Japan. It is a serious international issue involving human health, the marine environment and overall environmental security.

    Besides, Japan is a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, the Convention on Nuclear Safety, and the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. So it should abide by these conventions and take necessary measures to protect the marine environment and avoid causing marine pollution.

    According to Articles 194 and 195 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan should, alone or in conjunction with other countries, take all necessary measures to prevent, reduce and control the pollution from the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water, and ensure nuclear contaminated water treatment activities don't cause cross-border pollution.

    The way Japan plans to discharge nuclear contaminated water violates international law on nuclear materials and nuclear wastes. Japan didn't notify or consult neighboring countries before taking the decision to discharge nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima plant, seriously violating the international law. Japan could have treated the nuclear contaminated water to minimize its environmental impact, but it has chosen the easier way to cut costs.

    Moreover, the US administration's support for Japan's decision is not only contradictory, but also could boomerang on itself. The US claims that Japan's radioactive contaminated water discharge policy complies with globally recognized nuclear safety standards, but at the same time it prohibits the import of many Japanese foods, fearing they could be nuclear-contaminated.

    No wonder many US experts have called on the administration to ask Japan not to discharge the radioactive water into the sea. For example, US marine conservation biologist Rick Steiner published an article in the Alaska Anchorage Daily urging the US administration to immediately stop Japan's nuclear contaminated water discharge plan. He said that nuclear contaminated water contains many radioactive elements, and if released into the Pacific Ocean, it will pollute the waters near California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington and Alaska. He also said that Japan's claim that the risk associated with the discharge of the nuclear contaminated water is small is neither credible nor scientific.

    Since Japan's plan to discharge the radioactive water into the sea could seriously damage the global marine environment and endanger the lives and health of human beings, governments and people across the world should jointly oppose it.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

    The author is a professor with the Institute of International Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 亚洲国产综合无码一区二区二三区 | 久久精品无码午夜福利理论片| 中文精品久久久久人妻不卡| 97人妻无码一区二区精品免费| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品无码激情AV| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久| 一级中文字幕免费乱码专区 | 中文字幕亚洲综合精品一区| AV成人午夜无码一区二区| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区四区| 国产高清中文手机在线观看| 无码人妻精品中文字幕免费东京热| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码娇色| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 中文字幕一区图| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 青春草无码精品视频在线观| 亚洲av永久无码精品秋霞电影影院| 久久五月精品中文字幕| 亚洲天堂中文字幕| 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕一区| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久精品1| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字 | 国产成人无码精品一区在线观看 | 精选观看中文字幕高清无码| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕图| 亚洲AV无码精品无码麻豆| 亚洲AV无码国产丝袜在线观看| 中文无码制服丝袜人妻av| 亚洲国产精品无码AAA片| 亚洲AV无码日韩AV无码导航| 少妇人妻无码精品视频app| 人妻丰满熟妇av无码区不卡| 精品无码av一区二区三区 | 无码激情做a爰片毛片AV片| 西西4444www大胆无码| 中文字幕精品无码久久久久久3D日动漫| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频| 亚洲av无码国产精品色在线看不卡 |