Heated debate triggered as more US colleges go 'test optional'

    By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2022-05-02 08:16
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    A student majoring in biology works during a class break at California State University in November 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

    Student barriers

    The SAT costs $55 for the 2021-22 school year. Gabrielle Piccirilli, who is majoring in English at Villanova University, wrote in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal that high schools often encourage students to take exams multiple times to improve their scores, and these costs are barriers to low-income students "scoring as high as their intelligence allows".

    "A student who can take the SAT four times after rigorous test-specific prep will have a better shot than one who can only afford to take it once without preparation outside of schooling-even if they are equally smart," Piccirilli wrote.

    Schools seeking to diversify their student body are also concerned that test scores are often closely linked to a student's race and wealth.

    A study in 2020 by researchers at the Brookings Institution found a wide racial gap in SAT results, particularly in math.

    According to an investigation by the institution into the SAT math scores for more than 2.1 million high school graduates in 2020, white students scored an average of 93 points higher than black students, and 69 points higher than Hispanic or Latino students. Asian students scored 85 points higher than white students.

    Of those scoring more than 700 points in the 800-point math test, 43 percent were Asian and 45 percent white, while 6 percent were Hispanic or Latino, and 1 percent black.

    "Black, Hispanic or Latino students routinely score lower in the math section of the SAT-a likely result of generations of exclusionary housing, education and economic policy-which too often means that rather than reducing existing racial gaps, using the test in college admissions reinforces them," researchers said in their report. "While attempting to measure college readiness, the SAT both mirrors and maintains racial inequity."

    These findings echo an analysis by Georgetown University researchers in 2019, who found that if the most selective US colleges and universities relied solely on SAT scores for admission decisions, their campuses would be wealthier, whiter and have more male students.

    The biggest losers were black and Latino students, whose numbers would be cut nearly in half, with the principal winners being wealthy white male students, whose ranks would increase, according to the analysis.

    After dropping the standardized testing requirement, some universities have seen significant increases in applications for admissions. The University of California received record-level applications for autumn last year and admitted its largest and most diverse undergraduate intake ever, according to its president's office.

    Cornell University reported that it enrolled a more diverse intake, including a nearly 50 percent rise in the proportion of first-generation college students-those whose parents did not complete a four-year college or university degree.

    The University of Chicago shifted to test-optional admissions in 2018 to expand diversity. Its current intake of freshmen has 56 percent more black students, 26 percent more Hispanic and Latino students, 33 percent more rural students and 36 percent more first-generation students than the intake that enrolled before the policy change.

    |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next   >>|
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    天堂а√中文在线| 国产办公室秘书无码精品99| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 无码人妻久久一区二区三区免费丨| 无码不卡亚洲成?人片| 无码人妻精品一区二区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟av女| 夜夜添无码一区二区三区| 亚洲成a人片在线观看中文动漫| 久久精品中文字幕无码绿巨人| 精品国产一区二区三区无码| 日韩欧美一区二区三区中文精品| 熟妇人妻中文av无码| 无码精品一区二区三区免费视频| 成人无码区免费A片视频WWW| 中文字幕aⅴ人妻一区二区| 精品人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区| xx中文字幕乱偷avxx| 亚洲一区二区三区无码中文字幕| 久久久久无码中| 久久久久无码精品国产| 亚洲va中文字幕无码久久| 无码AV动漫精品一区二区免费| 大蕉久久伊人中文字幕| 在线观看免费中文视频| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线播放 | 在线播放无码高潮的视频 | 伊人久久综合精品无码AV专区| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊| 亚洲中文字幕一二三四区苍井空| 精品无人区无码乱码大片国产| 国产V亚洲V天堂无码| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 久久久久久国产精品无码超碰 | 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 韩日美无码精品无码| 中文无码久久精品| 无码精品A∨在线观看中文| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安| 东京热加勒比无码少妇|