久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Ian Goodrum

Did the media lie the world into an Omicron wave?

By Ian Goodrum | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2022-05-19 09:11
Share
Share - WeChat
JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

The news media, it must be said, does not have the strongest sense of scientific literacy.

I doubt this will court a great deal of controversy. Experts in countless fields have vented their frustrations with how their research is misrepresented in the pages of the mainstream press. In the era of COVID-19 this has reached new heights, with all manner of false narratives amplified by even the most storied institutions: wild speculation about a Chinese "cover-up", selective reporting on vaccine efficacy despite reams of real-world data and the initial rejection then wholehearted embrace of a "lab leak" origin hypothesis, to name only a few.

Yet despite this wholly justified mistrust, many continue to look to the media as a reliable source of information — even the aforementioned experts, who turn to another section of the hypothetical newspaper and passively accept whatever's written there. Novelist Michael Crichton coined the term "Gell-Mann amnesia effect" to describe this phenomenon, but we can just call it what it is: Phony credibility "earned" by being the richest, oldest kids on the block.

This might not be as big a deal for some topics; I doubt anyone suffers too badly if someone on the entertainment beat, for instance, gets the facts wrong. Maybe a producer makes an angry phone call. But it's an entirely different story when it comes to matters of life and death.

To that end, a study which received preliminary release early this month may have quietly upended everything we've been told about the Omicron variant currently predominating. After careful analysis of figures from the Omicron wave at the start of this year, experts from Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital have come to some troubling conclusions: "Our findings suggest…the Omicron variant was as deadly as the previous SARS-CoV-2 waves. The hospitalization risk had a less consistent pattern, but after accounting for confounders, Omicron seems to have a slightly higher hospitalization risk."

If this study proves to be accurate, then the media outlets that pushed "living with the virus" as a viable strategy led millions of people straight off a cliff.

Think back to January. The New York Times ran a high-profile column with the bold headline "Omicron Is Milder". The Wall Street Journal said "Omicron May End Up Saving Lives" in a similar vein. What followed was the biggest infection wave of the entire pandemic, where new records were set for daily infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Though it is a preprint and awaiting peer review, it should come as no surprise this study has been soundly ignored by those same outlets; giving it any attention would be tantamount to admitting guilt.

How many lives were lost because of this global swindle? How many were hoodwinked into thinking Omicron was the perfect pandemic off-ramp and thus threw caution to the winds? And how many chastised China for pursuing an aggressive containment strategy against a variant dismissed as "mild" in every "respectable" media outlet, only to pretend not to notice as more people than ever fell deathly ill?

A functioning society would not stand for this. There would be demands for justice, accountability and a sane pandemic policy based on science rather than the whims of corporations who wanted the economy revved back up at warp speed. Instead, the same media that spent those crucial months convincing the world Omicron was nothing to fear have turned to their old standby: Deflect, deflect, deflect.

Just as they did in the early months of the pandemic, they point the finger at one of the few places that has refused to submit to "let 'er rip" orthodoxy. In early 2020 Wuhan was the story; the proof China's measures were a "draconian" overreach. But as the virus swept the rest of the world and ICUs filled to bursting in countries that were supposedly "better at fighting outbreaks", as one poorly aged headline put it, it became all too clear that narrative would no longer fly.

As so many countries faltered, unwilling to take the bitter pill and put people over profits, there grew an urgent need to pass the buck. But by that time the worst of the outbreak in China had been contained, and life in Wuhan had largely gotten back to normal. Anyone with eyes could see those supposedly "authoritarian" measures had worked. Chastened, the media shifted tack, and thus began the running of other, aforementioned narratives.

Nearly two years later, enter Shanghai. As the outbreak there spiraled out of control, the old Wuhan playbook came back into fashion. In the last month and a half we've gotten the media's "Greatest Hits" album as they slipped back into their old habits with gusto, willfully ignoring the fact dozens of other cities handled their Omicron outbreaks with little incident. Whatever issues there were with Shanghai's outbreak response — and make no mistake, there were plenty — the country as a whole has proven time and time again it can do what it takes to protect its people.

All this to say the sheer weight of the media's deception does not depend on the results of a single study. If borne out, these findings only provide scientific proof for what was already abundantly clear: Ignorance of what this virus can do does nothing to prevent the consequences, and underestimation of its potential has never been anything but a grave error.

As if to drive this home, the US just this week crossed the grim threshold of one million cumulative deaths according to public data; the real count is unknowable, but likely far higher.

Rather than rage against a country trying to prevent that outcome for its own people, victimized populations should be demanding to know why those in charge have treated them as chattel for the sake of plutocrats' stock portfolios — and why a supposedly "free press" has aided and abetted it.

The author is a US writer with China Daily.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily. If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    欧美精品久久久久久久久老牛影院| 欧美日韩亚州综合| 久久午夜电影网| 久久国产精品99精品国产| 日韩一区二区三区四区| 精一区二区三区| 欧美另类高清zo欧美| 秋霞成人午夜伦在线观看| 日韩欧美高清dvd碟片| 黄页网站大全一区二区| 久久久美女毛片| 国产不卡在线一区| 1000部国产精品成人观看| 91在线免费播放| 亚洲制服丝袜av| 欧美日本韩国一区| 蜜桃免费网站一区二区三区| 欧美午夜理伦三级在线观看| 日本欧美加勒比视频| 精品剧情在线观看| 成人免费视频app| 一区二区三区在线视频观看| 欧美三级蜜桃2在线观看| 奇米影视7777精品一区二区| 精品国产一二三区| 成人精品高清在线| 亚洲精品久久嫩草网站秘色| 欧美日韩一区成人| 激情都市一区二区| 亚洲欧美另类久久久精品2019| 欧美少妇xxx| 狠狠色2019综合网| 国产精品萝li| 欧美日韩卡一卡二| 韩国成人福利片在线播放| 中文字幕一区免费在线观看| 欧美视频一区二区| 日韩激情av在线| 国产欧美va欧美不卡在线| 在线免费观看日本欧美| 美日韩一级片在线观看| 国产精品欧美久久久久无广告| 91久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美| 美国十次综合导航| 国产精品乱码一区二三区小蝌蚪| 欧美日韩在线不卡| 国产精品一区二区x88av| ...av二区三区久久精品| 7777精品伊人久久久大香线蕉经典版下载| 精品一区二区三区在线播放视频| 亚洲视频精选在线| 欧美日韩国产bt| 粉嫩av一区二区三区在线播放| 亚洲制服丝袜av| 国产片一区二区| 在线不卡中文字幕| 99热99精品| 久久电影网站中文字幕| 亚洲猫色日本管| 久久免费电影网| 欧美日本在线播放| 粉嫩一区二区三区性色av| 丝袜诱惑制服诱惑色一区在线观看| 国产日韩精品一区二区三区| 日韩一二三区视频| 六月丁香婷婷久久| 久久久另类综合| 欧美午夜理伦三级在线观看| 亚洲综合激情另类小说区| 色哟哟亚洲精品| 青青青爽久久午夜综合久久午夜| 国产日韩影视精品| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区四区 | 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 成人综合在线观看| 午夜精品免费在线| 综合av第一页| 日本一区二区三区在线不卡| 日韩一级黄色片| 欧美性受xxxx| 不卡在线观看av| 亚洲国产成人精品视频| 中文字幕av一区二区三区免费看| 韩国三级电影一区二区| 亚洲欧美电影一区二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久闺蜜 | 日韩av二区在线播放| 亚洲视频狠狠干| 国产精品亲子伦对白| 国产欧美精品一区| 欧美本精品男人aⅴ天堂| 欧美视频在线一区二区三区| 色综合婷婷久久| 91丨九色丨尤物| 99re热这里只有精品免费视频| 成人免费毛片app| av电影在线观看一区| 盗摄精品av一区二区三区| 国产美女精品人人做人人爽| 久久精品99国产国产精| 美日韩一区二区| 九色|91porny| 精品在线免费观看| 久久av资源网| 国产精品91一区二区| 国产福利一区二区| 成人永久aaa| av中文字幕在线不卡| 99国产精品一区| 91免费视频网址| 色94色欧美sute亚洲线路二| 91福利视频久久久久| 欧美三级日韩三级| 91精品国产综合久久小美女| 欧美一级电影网站| 欧美成人三级在线| 久久亚洲二区三区| 国产精品乱子久久久久| 亚洲色图都市小说| 亚洲午夜免费福利视频| 偷拍自拍另类欧美| 久久激五月天综合精品| 国产一区免费电影| 国产成人av一区二区三区在线| www.色综合.com| 91黄色激情网站| 欧美伦理电影网| 精品国产自在久精品国产| 国产色爱av资源综合区| 国产精品国产三级国产有无不卡| 国产精品久久久久aaaa樱花 | 国产清纯白嫩初高生在线观看91| 国产精品欧美一区喷水| 一区二区视频在线| 天天综合色天天综合| 久久99日本精品| 成人精品gif动图一区| 91成人免费电影| 欧美一区二区三区成人| 久久亚洲精品小早川怜子| 综合亚洲深深色噜噜狠狠网站| 一区二区免费看| 麻豆精品一区二区av白丝在线| 国产成人久久精品77777最新版本| 91亚洲永久精品| 欧美一区二区三区系列电影| 久久精品亚洲精品国产欧美 | 日韩欧美国产午夜精品| 国产欧美一区视频| 亚洲午夜精品网| 国产最新精品免费| 91蜜桃视频在线| 欧美电影免费提供在线观看| 国产精品污网站| 亚洲va韩国va欧美va| 国产一区二区伦理| 在线精品视频小说1| 日韩免费观看高清完整版| 国产精品超碰97尤物18| 日韩av在线发布| av电影在线观看一区| 日韩情涩欧美日韩视频| 亚洲色图欧美在线| 久久99国产精品久久| 91国模大尺度私拍在线视频| 日韩精品一区二区三区蜜臀| 亚洲欧美日韩成人高清在线一区| 日本aⅴ免费视频一区二区三区| 成人涩涩免费视频| 日韩午夜中文字幕| 亚洲欧美成人一区二区三区| 韩国欧美一区二区| 欧美美女bb生活片| 国产精品久久久久久久浪潮网站| 日韩av在线发布| 94-欧美-setu| 国产亚洲欧美中文| 日本麻豆一区二区三区视频| 99久久er热在这里只有精品66| 欧美成人r级一区二区三区| 一区二区三区四区精品在线视频| 国产中文字幕一区| 在线电影院国产精品| 一区在线观看视频| 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合| 欧美三级电影网站| 成人欧美一区二区三区在线播放| 久久国产精品第一页| 欧美日韩大陆在线| 亚洲欧美日韩久久| 成人av在线一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产电影| 一区二区三区在线视频免费观看| 国产精品一区二区久久不卡| 日韩一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲精品ww久久久久久p站| 国产激情91久久精品导航| 91精品国产综合久久久久久| 一区在线中文字幕| 成人激情电影免费在线观看|