久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / HK Macao

More changes expected for HK's 'social contract'

By Richard Cullen | China Daily Global | Updated: 2022-08-22 08:56
Share
Share - WeChat
Pedestrians take pictures at the promenade beside the Victoria Harbour in the Tsim Sha Tsui district in Hong Kong. [Photo/IC]

Clear signs are emerging that Hong Kong's essential "social contract" is undergoing a degree of renovation. Moreover, this process looks set to continue. Before examining why this is so, we need to consider the meaning of this expression.

"Social contract" is a term dating to the 17th century work of English political philosopher Thomas Hobbes. Its scope was made more explicit in the 18th century by English philosopher John Locke and Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Briefly, it describes the circumscribed but protective and usually mutually accepted forms of interaction among individuals and groups within their social environment.

Modern political philosophers give the term a particular meaning: an unwritten agreement regarding rights and responsibilities shared between a state and its citizens.

Since the new Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government took office on July 1, many articles have appeared urging various changes in how the government should tackle a range of crucial livelihood issues that are of specific concern to Hong Kong's very large low-income population.

The most important way that successive Hong Kong governments have assisted the vast grassroots sector has been through the provision of secure, small public rental housing on a scale seen in few other major developed cities. But the demand for public rental housing still greatly exceeds supply, with the result that an estimated 226,000 residents, including many children, still live in tiny, subdivided units, and the waiting list for public rental housing has stretched to around six years.

Recommendations for Hong Kong to work much harder on resolving this problem have intensified. Accompanying these calls are heartfelt exhortations to tackle shortfalls in, for example, healthcare, eldercare, child care, education and career prospects for young adults.

In mid-July, Lau Siu-kai, a professor at The Chinese University of Hong Kong, spelled out his understanding of the decisive speech that President Xi Jinping gave in Hong Kong on July 1. Lau said Xi's speech signaled that the HKSAR government needed "to substantially change its political mindset "so that the new-term government could "live up to what the people expect of it".

Lau said that the doctrines of "laissez faire, positive noninterventionism or small government-big market, so glorified in the past, should no longer be followed". He concluded that "a more active and people-oriented HKSAR government is desperately needed to promote long-term and sustainable economic development and enhance social justice and fairness."

This is a clear articulation, from an influential scholar, of the need for fundamental changes in Hong Kong's previously long-established social contract. But what did that original, evolved social contract look like? In a series of three influential books, published between 2007 and 2018, another scholar, Leo Goodstadt, explained in detail how business and professional leaders in Hong Kong had long enjoyed a remarkable influence over government policy-setting. This pivotal power of influential persuasion dates back to the 19th century and continued, in Goodstadt's view, after 1997.

It is true that Hong Kong's achievements when it operated in accordance with the previously dominant social contract were extraordinary. By some estimates, Hong Kong had a lower per capita GDP than India in 1945, yet less than 40 years later, its per capita GDP exceeded that of the United Kingdom. In addition, the city government did, during that era, make remarkable strides in building basic public rental housing for several million residents-especially after the deadly riots in the 1960s.

But the problem, as Goodstadt emphasized, was always the lack of a full commitment to fair provision of enhanced benefits for the entire population. Many have commented that this sharply experienced disparity was part of the proximate context underlying the insurrection that took hold from mid-2019.

The International Monetary Fund said in June 2020 that the COVID-19 pandemic had generated "a crisis like no other". As the Hong Kong SAR government began to tackle this exceptional emergency, an important shift in the way in which the social contract operated in the SAR became evident. For well over two years, the perceived rights of the huge number of low-income residents in Hong Kong have been prioritized, by persisting with a strategy influenced by the dynamic zero-COVID policy, notwithstanding a powerfully argued case by a number of business and professional leaders to move decisively away from that strategy. This approach, which aimed to protect the extensive, hospital-based service that is of central importance in protecting the health of Hong Kong's broad low-income population, closely followed aspects of COVID-19 policymaking on the Chinese mainland.

One way of taking a measure of this change is to consider whether, given the traditionally elevated level of business and professional influence on government in Hong Kong, the COVID-19 pandemic may have been managed in a measurably different way had it struck two or three decades earlier.

Considering how the government in pre-1997 Hong Kong was long seen to favor the needs of the professional and elite business class-a trend continued after the creation of the Hong Kong SAR-this prioritizing of the needs of the vulnerable, working class in Hong Kong is not, at first glance, what one might expect. Yet it has happened. This points toward a relatively recent, appreciable shift within certain operational precepts governing the social contract in Hong Kong.

Barrington Moore Jr, a US political sociologist, argued in the 1960s that, eventually, certain embedded societal structures influence the primary protocols of a given social contract. Ultimately, this argument holds that operational political regimes are shaped by the social-class structure of a given jurisdiction.

Although it is too early to say that Hong Kong is unmistakably set to confirm these insights, the intensified, influential calls on the new Hong Kong SAR government to focus keenly on enhancing social justice signal that further significant adjustments to Hong Kong's social contract may yet follow.

The author is a visiting professor on the faculty of law at the University of Hong Kong.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    国产一区二区精品在线观看| 日本不卡1234视频| 99免费精品在线观看| 国产精品免费久久久久| 99国产麻豆精品| 一区二区三区四区在线免费观看| 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 | 国产91丝袜在线观看| 国产精品日韩精品欧美在线| 91蝌蚪porny| 天天色天天爱天天射综合| 欧美电影免费观看高清完整版| 国产一区二区三区日韩| 国产精品不卡在线观看| 欧美日韩中字一区| 久久福利资源站| 欧美国产日韩a欧美在线观看| 色综合久久综合网| 一区二区三区在线视频免费| 欧美一级精品在线| 成人免费的视频| 亚洲无线码一区二区三区| 欧美成人a在线| 成人aaaa免费全部观看| 亚洲gay无套男同| 久久久精品免费免费| 99国产欧美另类久久久精品| 蜜臀精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久久久久麻豆| 一本色道a无线码一区v| 日韩精品91亚洲二区在线观看| 26uuu精品一区二区三区四区在线| 波多野洁衣一区| 日韩成人免费在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 56国语精品自产拍在线观看| 成人午夜精品一区二区三区| 日韩电影在线观看网站| 另类调教123区 | 老色鬼精品视频在线观看播放| 久久美女艺术照精彩视频福利播放| 91丨porny丨国产| 自拍偷拍欧美激情| 欧美顶级少妇做爰| 成人免费av在线| 日本亚洲免费观看| 国产精品五月天| 欧美一卡在线观看| 96av麻豆蜜桃一区二区| 蜜桃av一区二区在线观看| 最新国产の精品合集bt伙计| 日韩精品一区二| 在线免费一区三区| 国产ts人妖一区二区| 中文字幕av资源一区| 色综合久久88色综合天天6| 美女视频网站黄色亚洲| 国产精品高潮呻吟久久| 337p粉嫩大胆色噜噜噜噜亚洲 | 国产精品久久综合| 欧美一级日韩免费不卡| 在线精品视频小说1| 国产精品综合在线视频| 日韩 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲毛片av在线| 中文字幕欧美国产| 欧美大片免费久久精品三p| 欧美视频一区二| av影院午夜一区| 国产传媒欧美日韩成人| 麻豆精品国产传媒mv男同| 亚洲高清免费在线| 亚洲欧美激情视频在线观看一区二区三区| 久久婷婷综合激情| 日韩午夜小视频| 欧美日韩高清影院| 91行情网站电视在线观看高清版| 成人国产亚洲欧美成人综合网| 精品亚洲欧美一区| 美女在线视频一区| 日韩高清欧美激情| 亚洲成av人片在www色猫咪| 亚洲日本va午夜在线电影| 中文字幕欧美日韩一区| 国产人妖乱国产精品人妖| 精品国产欧美一区二区| 日韩欧美资源站| 欧美一区二区免费视频| 欧美美女喷水视频| 欧美日韩精品一区视频| 国产一区二区三区国产| 首页综合国产亚洲丝袜| 一区二区三区小说| 一区二区三区国产精华| 亚洲欧美日韩综合aⅴ视频| 国产精品美女视频| 中文字幕av免费专区久久| 久久麻豆一区二区| 国产日产欧美一区| 日本一区二区高清| 日本一区二区三区电影| 欧美激情资源网| 国产精品区一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品精华液2区45| 欧美国产成人在线| 中文字幕欧美区| 中文字幕一区二区三区不卡在线| 国产精品国产a| 亚洲人成电影网站色mp4| 亚洲欧美日韩国产综合在线| 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区日本| 一个色在线综合| 午夜天堂影视香蕉久久| 丝袜亚洲另类欧美| 欧美a级一区二区| 美女诱惑一区二区| 国产乱子轮精品视频| 成人免费av网站| 色婷婷久久综合| 欧美丝袜第三区| 欧美一区中文字幕| 欧美xxx久久| 国产女同性恋一区二区| 亚洲天堂av一区| 亚洲一级二级三级在线免费观看| 五月天网站亚洲| 久久91精品久久久久久秒播| 国产大片一区二区| 日本久久一区二区三区| 欧美久久久影院| 国产激情视频一区二区三区欧美| 中文av一区特黄| 中文字幕在线不卡| 亚洲少妇最新在线视频| 亚洲综合激情另类小说区| 三级精品在线观看| 激情综合网av| 99国产精品视频免费观看| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区| 日韩一级二级三级| 欧美激情在线一区二区| 一区二区三区视频在线看| 秋霞影院一区二区| 国产成人av一区二区三区在线| 91在线观看视频| 5566中文字幕一区二区电影| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区视频 | 亚洲美女少妇撒尿| 免费观看在线综合色| 高清国产一区二区| 欧美曰成人黄网| 日韩欧美国产wwwww| 国产精品美女久久久久aⅴ国产馆 国产精品美女久久久久av爽李琼 国产精品美女久久久久高潮 | 91热门视频在线观看| 69av一区二区三区| 中文字幕欧美国产| 午夜在线成人av| 国产激情精品久久久第一区二区| 91黄色小视频| 久久久三级国产网站| 一区二区三区欧美| 麻豆freexxxx性91精品| av一区二区三区在线| 日韩欧美一区二区免费| 中文字幕一区二区日韩精品绯色| 日本午夜精品视频在线观看| 成人av网址在线观看| 91精选在线观看| 日韩一区日韩二区| 久久精品国产免费看久久精品| 99免费精品视频| 日韩欧美黄色影院| 亚洲色图自拍偷拍美腿丝袜制服诱惑麻豆 | 国产精品午夜免费| 日本三级亚洲精品| 成人国产精品免费网站| 日韩欧美亚洲国产另类| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久久久| 国产精品一二三在| 欧美日韩黄色影视| 国产精品三级电影| 麻豆91小视频| 欧美性色黄大片手机版| 国产欧美精品一区二区色综合 | 五月天丁香久久| 9l国产精品久久久久麻豆| 欧美大白屁股肥臀xxxxxx| 亚洲精品少妇30p| 国产91露脸合集magnet| 7777精品伊人久久久大香线蕉超级流畅 | 国产精品一区二区在线播放 | 午夜精品久久久久久久久久| av色综合久久天堂av综合| 精品久久久久久久久久久院品网| 亚洲成人免费影院| 91丨九色丨黑人外教| 国产婷婷一区二区| 老色鬼精品视频在线观看播放| 欧美精品久久99久久在免费线 |