Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Global Lens

    Protectionist measures could backfire on EU carmakers

    By Otton Solis | China Daily | Updated: 2024-06-21 06:15
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

    Major Western economies are engaged in a race to hinder China's exports. After sanctioning Chinese telecommunications conglomerate Huawei, and restricting the imports of Chinese-made batteries, steel and critical minerals, the United States and the European Union have announced tariffs of up to 100 percent and 38.1 percent, respectively, on electric vehicles (EVs) imported from China.

    The core argument of the US and the EU for imposing the tariffs is that EV-makers in China benefit heavily from government subsidies, and China's overcapacity in EV batteries is the result of the Chinese government's industrial policy and subsidies.

    The protectionist path chosen by the Joe Biden administration was laid by the Donald Trump administration and threatens to drastically slow the growth of global trade and the development of global value chains, affecting the international division of labor. This will impinge on the likely advantages of fair competition and free market on which Western economic theories rest.

    In such a situation, China is bound to take countermeasures. But even if it doesn't, the Western economies' protectionist measures against Chinese exports will hurt Western companies which have manufacturing units in and export their products from China. Highlighting this fact recently, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said half of the EVs imported from China are manufactured by Western companies.

    As a matter of fact, no less than German Transportation Minister Volker Wissing expressed concerns over the tariffs, saying the EU's move will deal a blow to German companies and their products, adding that cars must become cheaper through more competition, open markets and significantly better business conditions in the EU, not through trade war and market isolation. Several German carmakers, including Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen, too, have spoken against the tariffs.

    And the president of the German Association of Automotive Industry (VDA), Hildegard Muller, has said tariffs will not solve the problems facing the auto industry, stressing that instead of imposing tariffs, efforts should focus on making the EU more attractive for manufacturers.

    Given its economic strength, China can disrupt the free flow of global trade in ways that would hurt Western carmakers. But it won't do so because that could lead to a full-fledged trade war, which incidentally some Western leaders want as it would help them decouple their countries' economies with China's, resulting in losses for all economies, including the US, the EU, Japan and China.

    The West has adhered to the theory of comparative advantage with almost religious zeal since British economist David Ricardo propounded it in 1817. The theory is at the heart of the aspirations that, for instance, shape the rules advocated by the World Trade Organization, which until recently was strongly supported by the Western economies. But now that the comparative advantages have shifted eastward, the Western economies are out to defy the theory.

    The question that arises is: Which economies would be the losers and which the winners if all economies resorted to protectionism? Before that question is answered, it ought to be mentioned that the US has made strenuous efforts to unify the Western economies against a supposed "common enemy", in order to maintain its global hegemony. But this strategy has almost never proved successful. What would happen in a hypothetical situation of the US succeeding in containing China? Without a perceived common enemy, the Western economies most probably would be locked in fierce competitions, leading to fierce trade wars.

    To know which economies would end up as the losers and which the winners, we need to know which economies have a market large enough to achieve a high rate of growth, excel in competition and benefit from the international division of labor so as to compensate, even if partly, for the de-globalization of the world economy.

    China has a massive and still growing domestic market. It has a high rate of savings and investment. It has demonstrated capability to further enhance R&D, realize technological diversification, and boost its national strength. These factors place China in a relatively advantageous position to minimize the negative impact of a world without free and fair global trade.

    China wants to prevent the global economies from engaging in a protectionist war. But to at least win the intellectual debate on the issue, the Chinese government ought to take the initiative to resolve the issue. Asking the relevant questions is one way of showing that the core reason behind the current situation is that China's companies are more efficient and competitive than their Western counterparts in most fields.

    Further proof of Western hypocrisy can be found in their agricultural policy. The agricultural sector in both the US and the EU is heavily subsidized — by tens of billions of dollars a year. The two economies also impose punitive tariffs on imports from quite a few countries.

    For instance, the EU imposes a heavy tariff on imported bananas to protect uncompetitive farmers from the Canary Islands. The EU cannot justify imposing the tariffs on farm produce from countries such as Costa Rica, Ecuador and Honduras, because banana producers in those countries do not get any subsidies. The only reason why the EU imposes tariffs on banana imports is that banana producers in the EU cannot compete with their Latin American counterparts.

    In short, the tariffs imposed by the EU and the US on Chinese-made EVs are a means to protect their domestic car industry from the more competitive Chinese carmakers. In the eyes of the EU and the US, China's sin is not that it has robust industrial policy, but because it exhibits a high degree of efficiency and competitiveness.

    The author is a professor at Instituto Empresarial University in Spain, a senior fellow at the Beijing Club for International Dialogue and was special adviser to the president of Costa Rica from 2018-2022. The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

    The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

    If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    日韩精品无码一区二区三区 | 日韩免费人妻AV无码专区蜜桃| 无码人妻一区二区三区精品视频| 中文字幕无码一区二区免费| 久久精品中文字幕无码绿巨人| 国产V亚洲V天堂无码久久久| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 无码日韩人妻精品久久蜜桃| 免费无码H肉动漫在线观看麻豆| 久久精品中文无码资源站| 中文字幕国产精品| 潮喷失禁大喷水aⅴ无码| 无码中文av有码中文a| 最新国产AV无码专区亚洲| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日本中文字幕| 熟妇人妻VA精品中文字幕| 少女视频在线观看完整版中文| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产 | 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区牛牛| 国产成人三级经典中文| 亚洲äv永久无码精品天堂久久 | 无码专区久久综合久中文字幕| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 伊人久久大香线蕉无码麻豆| 久久国产精品无码网站| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 精品久久久久久无码人妻热 | 国精品无码一区二区三区在线| 日韩国产精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV日韩AV高潮无码专区| 无码专区久久综合久中文字幕| 日韩人妻无码精品一专区| 潮喷无码正在播放| 无码专区一va亚洲v专区在线| 中文毛片无遮挡高潮免费| 久久国产高清字幕中文| 欧美成人中文字幕在线看| 狠狠躁天天躁中文字幕无码|