Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Global Views

    Weight gain

    By WANG MINGGUO | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-01-14 08:54
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    ZHANG TING/FOR CHINA DAILY

    With the collective rise of the Global South, a hybrid international order is taking shape

    Global political and economic power is undergoing a subtle shift toward the Global South. In terms of economic, military, demographic and cultural strength, the Global South is increasingly gaining weight, emerging as a new force in the global governance structure. The collective rise of the Global South has propelled the growth of international institutions such as the BRICS and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, while also reviving and transforming institutions such as the G77 and the Non-Aligned Movement.

    Geographically, the divide between the Global North and the Global South roughly extends along the Tropic of Cancer. The Global South includes Mexico and the Caribbean, most of South America, Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, East Asia and Oceania (excluding Japan, Australia, and New Zealand).The Global South accounts for more than 85 percent of the world's population and nearly 40 percent of the global GDP.It is projected that by 2030, three of the world's four largest economies, namely China, India and Indonesia, will come from the Global South and the BRICS countries' combined GDP will surpass that of the G7. Global South countries share similar historical experiences and struggles and have common development aspirations, converging on a new consensus for South-South cooperation, which has helped to establish a new political-economic connection based on solidarity, cooperation, and a sense of belonging.

    The growing influence of the Global South countries has brought into question the legitimacy and transparency of the Western international system and the so-called rule-based Western order, revealing its inherent contradictions and weakening efficiency. The United States has established a system of institutional hegemony that seeks private interests through its political system, alliances, technologies, currency, and market economy. These institutions often carry out the US agenda, unfairly distribute international public goods, and protect Western interests by marginalizing the Global South's demands.

    For example, the International Monetary Fund has failed to complete the reforms of quotas and governance mechanisms on schedule, and the World Bank also faces issues of legitimacy and transparency in the selection and accountability mechanisms of its senior executives, leading to unfair treatment of the Global South. Global South countries need to work together to advance reforms in these institutions to reflect their demands and interests. Fortunately, organizations under the liberal international order are adapting to these challenges and are gradually being replaced by institutional types that reflect the new international power structure.

    In addition, the US is increasingly inclined toward exclusive minilateralism rather than inclusive multilateralism. And the North-South rivalry in numerous issues is escalating, particularly in the China-US competition.

    As the Western norms are being challenged, the world is likely to be dragged into an ideological competition by the Western countries to maintain their dominance over the Global South through international systems and political-economic power. This includes imposing various restrictions on the Global South through their norms such as human rights, democracy, liberalism and big power responsibility.

    This brings South-South cooperation to the center stage of world politics, an independent pole in shaping the international order. Currently the Global South is promoting the construction of a new international system to address issues such as poverty reduction, food security, development financing, climate change and the digital economy. With the diversification of actors, authorities and institutions, a hybrid international order involving multiple actors is likely to gradually replace the US-led one. The functional differentiation in issues will lead to a more pronounced demand for international systems from various countries under the hybrid international order.

    In contrast to the West, the Global South advocates for international norms such as sovereign equality, non-interference in internal affairs, the democratization of international relations, international cooperation, and multilateralism. To better promote these norms, the Global South countries persist in their efforts to call for North-South dialogue on the basis of unity and cooperation, engaging in multi-level, multi-field, and multichannel communication, exchanges, and dialogue regarding internationally accepted norms and national behavioral standards.

    The distribution of international power is accelerating its shift from a unipolar to a multipolar pattern, with the formation of a multipolar world political landscape continuously gaining speed. The Ukraine crisis and the containment and blockade actions of the US-led West against Russia marked the political awakening of the Global South. More than 50 Global South countries voted against sanctions on Russia. At the same time, the Global South is actively seeking to build a resilient partnership with leeway between China and the US. In addition, it is also actively mediating the Ukraine crisis and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, becoming an important pole affecting the international security order. After the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis, the vast majority of Global South countries have called for a ceasefire and talks, and are pushing for a de-escalation of the situation. For example, six African heads of state, formed an African mediation group for the Ukraine crisis, highlighting the growing political confidence of the Global South and a new understanding of the shaping of a new international order.

    The author is a professor at the School of Government at East China University of Political Science and Law. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.

    The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

    Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    香蕉伊蕉伊中文视频在线 | 日韩成人无码中文字幕| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕 | 精品久久久久久久久久中文字幕| 国产亚洲人成无码网在线观看| 亚洲JIZZJIZZ中国少妇中文 | 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 国产色无码精品视频免费| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文福利| 精品无人区无码乱码大片国产| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲天堂2017无码中文| 人妻中文无码久热丝袜| 大学生无码视频在线观看| 少妇人妻偷人精品无码视频 | 中文字幕无码无码专区| xx中文字幕乱偷avxx| 无码中文人妻视频2019 | 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中文| 88久久精品无码一区二区毛片 | 亚洲自偷自偷偷色无码中文| 日本成人中文字幕| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文| 亚洲综合中文字幕无线码| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 国产AV巨作情欲放纵无码| 色综合AV综合无码综合网站| 亚洲乱码无码永久不卡在线| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码区HD| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区牛牛 | 亚洲国产精品无码久久一线| 人妻系列AV无码专区| 亚洲精品无码av人在线观看| 久久久久精品国产亚洲AV无码 | 精品亚洲A∨无码一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线r▽ | 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久 | 亚洲日韩激情无码一区| 无码一区二区三区| 毛片无码免费无码播放| 精品久久久久久无码免费|