Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Editorials

    AI needs global consensus on its governance: China Daily editorial

    chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-02-12 19:59
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    As artificial intelligence breakthroughs in the form of chatbots such as ChatGPT and, more recently, DeepSeek continue pushing the boundaries of the technology, the hopes and anxieties surrounding AI have grown simultaneously.

    How to harness the constructive potential of the nascent sector for the benefit of humanity while exerting effective control over the destructive ones has emerged as a new global challenge.

    Since the abusive deployment of AI technologies is no longer a mere fearful trope of science fiction, there is a pressing need for a global, intergovernmental consensus on how to approach such technological breakthroughs, which, handled properly, may bring enormous social and economic benefits; or else wreak immeasurable havoc.

    With the increasingly obvious damaging potential of AI technologies, a global consensus, rough as it may be at this stage, is of critical importance to ensure the responsible use of AI and the charting of a safe course for the thriving sector.

    It is therefore regrettable that the two-day Paris AI Action Summit, which closed on Tuesday, failed to bring on board two of the world's key industry leaders to its demonstration of that imperative solidarity.

    The AI Action Statement, which identifies the priority to ensure that "AI is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and trustworthy, taking into account international frameworks for all", garnered 61 signatories, but not those of the United States and the United Kingdom.

    The statement, which underscores the need for "the protection of human rights, gender equality, linguistic diversity, protection of consumers and of intellectual property rights", sets out the ambition to reduce digital divides by promoting AI accessibility, and ensuring the development of AI is transparent, safe, secure and trustworthy.

    The US' absence, in particular, from such a needed consensus, reveals a deep divide among the world's key industry leaders that threatens the healthy progress of the AI sector. It is both the natural outgrowth of different outlooks on AI, and very possibly a dangerous driver of bifurcation in AI development in terms of both technological advancement and utilization.

    It was no surprise that US Vice-President JD Vance should make clear that the US dislikes regulation, which he said may strangle the emerging new industry given the new administration's stance.

    It is also well within expectation that Washington would take AI as a core dimension of its perceived strategic competition with China. The computer chips blockade that has run through both the Joe Biden and Donald Trump presidencies is all about that. Instead of inspiring fresh appreciation of the potential for bilateral cooperation, the disruptive emergence of DeepSeek from China seems to have triggered deeper fear of a Chinese AI threat.

    Seemingly oblivious to the irony of his remark, Vance even warned US allies to not partner with "authoritarian regimes" that in his words are "weaponizing" AI.

    Despite his remarks about "pro-growth AI policies" taking precedence over safety concerns, the US vice-president also made it sufficiently clear his government is turning AI into a decisive battlefield in what is broadly believed to be a new Cold War between the world's two largest economies.

    China's stance on AI governance is clear and consistent. At the G20 Summit on Reform of the Institutions of Global Governance, Chinese President Xi Jinping called for stepping up international governance and cooperation on AI, to make sure that it is used for good and for all, not a game of the rich countries and the wealthy.

    Prior to that, in September, China unveiled the first version of its AI Safety Governance Framework, which was formulated to implement the Global Initiative on AI Governance it has proposed.

    The framework makes clear that effective governance of Al depends on exchanges and cooperation with multiple stakeholders shouldering their responsibility to identify, prevent and respond to risks.

    As Chinese Vice-Premier Zhang Guoqing, Xi's special representative in the AI meeting, said in the French capital on Monday, the international community should improve global governance of the technology while embracing the principle of developing Al for the good of humanity and deepening cooperation to that end.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    无码精品人妻一区二区三区AV| 亚洲AV无码国产丝袜在线观看| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区乱子伦| 亚洲va中文字幕无码| 亚洲情XO亚洲色XO无码| 日韩三级中文字幕| 天堂а在线中文在线新版| 精品无码av一区二区三区| 波多野结衣AV无码久久一区| 亚洲一区二区中文| 亚洲无码高清在线观看| 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 亚洲人成无码网站在线观看| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码 | 中文无码熟妇人妻AV在线| 久久亚洲AV成人出白浆无码国产 | 亚洲视频无码高清在线| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 亚洲成A∨人片天堂网无码| 国产成人无码精品一区二区三区 | 成人无码视频97免费| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久久 | 亚洲AV无码成人精品区在线观看| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 中文毛片无遮挡高潮免费| 麻豆亚洲AV永久无码精品久久| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久| 欧洲人妻丰满av无码久久不卡| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕| 波多野结衣AV无码久久一区| 亚洲日产无码中文字幕| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费n鬼沢 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看 | 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看| 日韩精品人妻系列无码专区 | 亚洲日韩av无码| 日韩精品无码久久久久久| 国产无码网页在线观看| 午夜无码一区二区三区在线观看|