Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Global Views

    Wiggle room

    The EU should beware being trapped by the US as the Trump administration squeezes its strategic space

    By ZHAO HUAIPU | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-02-14 09:03
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

    China, the United States and the European Union are the world's three major strategic powers, and their trilateral relationships are largely determining the development direction for the global landscape in the 21st century.

    The three parties' relations are complicated, with their interests closely entwined. The UK political scientist Barry Buzan has noted that the relations between China, the US and the EU are a mix of friend and adversary, where competition and cooperation coexist.

    In addition to the coexistence of cooperation and rivalry, there are two other prominent features of the China-US-EU triangle relations.

    First, the US and the EU share common values, economic and political models, and similar goals in their long-term China strategies, thus leading to an unbalanced dynamic in the trilateral interactions. Second, the relationships among them are not static, and can be reshaped, which is particularly true of China-EU relations.

    China-US-EU relations are in a period of intense collision, with China-US rivalry being the primary contradiction in the triangle of relationships. The future of China-US ties mainly depends on how the two view each other and the stability of bilateral relations. In this process, the EU is a key variable.

    The EU plays multiple roles in the relationships among the three parties. It is a stakeholder and a mediator, a de facto ally of the US and a partner-cum-competitor of China.

    On the one hand, both China and the US regard the EU as a crucial stakeholder and seek its support. On the other hand, the EU hopes to mediate the China-US rivalry to maximize its own interests.

    As the EU shares similar values and political and economic systems with the US and relies on the US for security, the two parties are de facto allies. However, this does not mean that their respective interests concerning China are totally aligned.

    As for the China-EU relations, the two parties see each other as both partners and competitors. In recent years, the bilateral relations have become more complicated, and entered a new period of adjustment, with the EU emphasizing the aspect of competition in the relationship.

    The EU's multiple roles in the triangle have shaped its unique position in the triangle. The EU insists on not picking a side between China and the US, and seeks to balance and mediate their rivalry.

    The EU bets on both sides to influence the China-US relations and avoid being marginalized or forced to take sides. But choosing "strategic autonomy" does not mean the EU takes a neutral position between China and the US. In fact, the EU remains closer to the US, and the challenges it has encountered within the bloc in recent years have pushed it even closer to the US.

    As the US and the EU have no fundamental differences in their approach to China, the basic dynamic of the triangle is possibly evolving into the "EU and US against China".

    To preserve the current global order and pursue their common interests, the US and the EU have strengthened the transatlantic coordination on China, seeking to curb China's tech and economic development through investment and export controls, interfering in China's internal affairs on the grounds of "human rights abuses", and increasing alignment in "Indo-Pacific"-related issues to counter the influence of China's Belt and Road Initiative.

    During the Joe Biden administration, the EU and the US relaunched their bilateral dialogue on China, and established the Trade and Technology Council, which was designed to compete with China on trade and technology. In addition, interactions related to China among the US, the EU and NATO have also been strengthened simultaneously.

    The return of Donald Trump to the White House has brought new uncertainties to China-US-EU relations. Under the "Make America Great Again" doctrine, Washington will continue to regard containing China as a foreign policy priority and make technological and economic rivalry the core of its China strategy.

    Meanwhile, the upgraded "America First" and "transactionalism 2.0" will significantly disrupt the transatlantic relationship. Trump's political instinct to reshape US-EU ties coupled with the divisions his return has sown in European countries will further tilt the power balance within the transatlantic alliance toward the US, and increase the risk of Europe becoming a vassal of the US.

    Other challenges to the transatlantic relations include an underlying divergence over how to deal with the Ukraine crisis, conflicting interests in several areas, and the growing mistrust in bilateral ties. In a word, the return of Trump poses a serious challenge to Europe's strategic autonomy, piling more pressure on the EU to pick a side in the China-US rivalry.

    Against this backdrop, the influence of the EU "variable" on the trilateral relationships has become more prominent. The EU's increased dependence on Washington for security due to the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis, and the Trump administration's pressure on the EU to cooperate with the US on containing China will squeeze the EU's strategic space.

    Some political observers have said that European countries may buy weapons from the US in exchange for the latter's security guarantee, or support the US' China policy in exchange for the US taking a pro-Europe stance in its Russia policy.

    To summarize, the EU finds itself in a delicate situation in the China-US-EU trilateral relationships and under immense pressure to balance between the two powers. Europe's perception of China may fall under greater sway of the Trump administration, prompting the two parties to trade interests in coordinating their approaches to China.

    But the EU should be aware that any expedient deal with the US on China offers no guarantee that the US will not harm European interests. The US and the EU are not equal partners, and Europe's concessions to the US will only deepen its reliance on the latter.

    As for China and the EU, it is in their common interest to maintain their partnership, which can help mitigate the risks in their respective relations with the US and expand the space for cooperation.

    China, for its part, should continue to try and build a stronger bond with Europe, while exploring the establishment of a China-US-EU trilateral interaction mechanism to push for a more stable and balanced development of their relationships.

     

    The author is a professor at China Foreign Affairs University. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.

    Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    免费a级毛片无码免费视频120软件 | 亚洲综合日韩中文字幕v在线| 亚洲无码在线播放| 中文字幕AV一区中文字幕天堂| 亚洲av日韩av无码| 日韩视频中文字幕精品偷拍| 久久久久久av无码免费看大片| 在线精品无码字幕无码AV| 日韩中文字幕免费视频| 国产在线拍揄自揄拍无码| 中文字幕无码高清晰| 精品国产毛片一区二区无码| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 午夜成人无码福利免费视频| 免费精品无码AV片在线观看| 精品多人p群无码| 最近2019免费中文字幕6| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看野外| 青青草无码免费一二三区| 亚洲精品无码av人在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃网站| 日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 久久久精品无码专区不卡| 精品无码久久久久久久动漫| 国产拍拍拍无码视频免费| 人妻中文字系列无码专区| 亚洲AV无码国产精品色午友在线| 曰韩人妻无码一区二区三区综合部| 最近2022中文字幕免费视频| 欧美人妻aⅴ中文字幕| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久| 亚洲 日韩经典 中文字幕| 无码高清不卡| 中文字幕无码成人免费视频| 中文字幕无码不卡在线| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码毛片| 精品人妻va出轨中文字幕| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费版视频| 精品久久久久久中文字幕人妻最新|