Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / Editorials

    Shortsighted bid to 'restore' dominance: China Daily editorial

    chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2025-04-10 22:12
    Share
    Share - WeChat

    While countries are reacting to the United States' tariff war, they should be aware that an executive order US President Donald Trump signed on Wednesday might have more immediate, grave and far-reaching impacts on them.

    The executive order, ostensibly intended to "restore American maritime dominance", calls for a Maritime Action Plan to revitalize the US' maritime industries. But its real focus is on China.

    The order directs the US Trade Representative to make recommendations regarding countering what it alleges are China's "anticompetitive" actions within the shipbuilding industry.

    It also directs the US government to work with the US' allies and partners to align trade policies with the aim of squeezing China out of the international supply chain and logistics sectors.

    And it directs the USTR to move ahead with a proposal that includes levying million-dollar US port docking fees on any ship that is part of a fleet that includes Chinese-built or Chinese-flagged vessels.

    Currently, it is estimated that about 90 percent of the world's ships are subject to the fee. But as the World Shipping Council warned, about 98 percent of the world's ships will be subject to the fee when they call at US ports because the charge applies both to existing and future Chinese-built ships and to any carrier that has at least one Chinese-built ship on order.

    However, eliminating China from the international supply chain and logistics sectors is purely wishful thinking.

    Industries today are a result of the global industrial distribution of labor along complicated industry and supply chains that span the world and incorporate numerous countries and entities.

    All these parties will be negatively affected by the US move that has already backfired in effect. For example Asian buyers, such as Japan, the Republic of Korea and Thailand, are reducing purchases of US agricultural products due to the US move, which has effectively shrunk the demand for US agricultural products. Traders revealed that the shortage of shipping capacity and the uncertainty caused by the trade war the US has launched against its trading partners are affecting purchases. Due to the influence of the executive order, some US soybean exporters have been unable to obtain soybean meal shipping quotes from shipping companies.

    The strong opposition of US ports, shipping companies and commerce associations, as well as the trading companies and retailers that are related to these sectors should prompt the US administration to reconsider the wisdom of its push and shove.

    That US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Wednesday repeated his comments from Tuesday, saying that not all of the measures outlined by the agency's original proposal would be implemented, should be seen as a sign that the US administration also realizes how damaging the effects of the measures will be if carried out to the letter. The USTR is expected to make its final decision on remedies by the middle of the month.

    Just like the adjustment of the "reciprocal tariff" policy it has been compelled to make in the process of implementation, the US administration is reportedly considering charging the port fees based on a ship's tonnage, rather than charging a uniform fee. This will allow small ships to pay lower fees, which is expected to help reduce the pressure on small ship owners in niche areas such as grain transportation, reducing the impacts on US farmers.

    Sources admitted to the media that when the Office of the US Trade Representative formulated the relevant plan, it mainly considered large container ships that transport retail goods, and they did not fully consider the impact of "docking fees" on the flow of goods.

    That's only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the US administration's lack of forethought in policymaking. It frequently has to do lot of patchwork in the process of implementing its ill-thought-out policies. While it brags that its policies will "Make America Great Again", all they really do is show how desperately low it will stoop to rob, steal or extort money from others.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    黑人无码精品又粗又大又长 | 无码国产精品一区二区免费虚拟VR| 一本大道东京热无码一区| 成人无码免费一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品一区 | 无码人妻少妇伦在线电影| 国产亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 一区二区三区无码高清视频| 亚洲AV区无码字幕中文色| yellow中文字幕久久网| 亚洲AV无码成H人在线观看| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲一日韩欧美中文字幕欧美日韩在线精品一区二 | 亚洲欧美精品一区久久中文字幕| 无码人妻一区二区三区精品视频| 日韩人妻无码精品一专区| 亚洲看片无码在线视频| 痴汉中文字幕视频一区| 精品久久久久久中文字幕大豆网| 老子影院午夜精品无码| 免费精品无码AV片在线观看| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码毛片| 线中文在线资源 官网| 色综合天天综合中文网| 久久中文娱乐网| 天堂…中文在线最新版在线| 亚洲欧美精品一中文字幕| 精品无人区无码乱码毛片国产| 无码AV波多野结衣久久| 蜜桃成人无码区免费视频网站| 亚洲第一极品精品无码久久| 亚洲国产精品成人精品无码区在线| 日本无码小泬粉嫩精品图| 自拍中文精品无码| 无码播放一区二区三区| 韩国19禁无遮挡啪啪无码网站| 无码人妻丝袜在线视频| 寂寞少妇做spa按摩无码| 高潮潮喷奶水飞溅视频无码| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久2017| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98|