International students at Harvard face uncertain academic futures

    Ending visitor program raises fears of wider damage to US education system

    By May Zhou in Houston | China Daily | Updated: 2025-05-26 07:36
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    Students walk on the campus of Harvard University. FAITH NINIVAGGI/REUTERS

    Big blow to education

    Academics and members of the public have voiced concerns the Trump administration's actions are damaging the wider US higher education system.

    "The president is risking a higher education catastrophe," Anthony Moretti, an associate professor at the Department of Communication and Organizational Leadership of Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh, told China Daily.

    "It's one thing if universities see a drop in the number of international students, but it's quite another if the doors of entry are closed. And while it's easy to say that the president might not issue a similar order for another university or two, the reality is the universities will be on unsteady ground."

    Sally Kornbluth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology president, said in a statement to the MIT community on Thursday: "I write to you in profound disbelief. The action the federal government took today to bar Harvard from having international students is devastating for American excellence, openness and ingenuity."

    In a post on the news site of The New York Times, which was recommended over 5,600 times, reader Peter Smallbach wrote: "Call me naive, but it's still amazing to me that the administration is willing to pull down one of the real pillars of American strength — its colleges and universities, envied around the world — in order to force ideological conformity. How anyone can think the result of this will actually make America 'great again' is beyond me".

    A post on the social network Reddit said: " (This will) reduce the international standing of one of the US' most respected universities and cause a reverse brain drain, because seriously what bright up-and-coming young mind is going to want to risk going to an American university now?"

    If the administration succeeds in barring international students from Harvard, the Ivy League school will suffer a huge financial impact as about a quarter of its student body is made up by international students, who generate hundreds of millions of dollars for the school.

    Moretti said a decline in international students will be especially difficult for smaller universities as they are dependent on tuition fees. International students pay more, so the bottom lines of many colleges and universities will take a beating should fewer international students choose to come to the US, he said.

    Moretti added while it's easy for people to think the courts will overrule the president, who then might back down, the damage to the US, and international students' worries about being able to enter and stay in the country will linger.

    Higher education is one of the few areas where the US is enjoying a "trade surplus", some observers pointed out. International students reportedly contributed $44 billion to the US economy last school year.

    "The US has had two industries that have consistently run trade surpluses — tourism and education — and Trump's policies are destroying both," said a post on the NYT site. "Someone explains this to me. It's beyond my understanding."

    There are voices, however, supporting the government's actions. Some view fewer international students as a "win", meaning more opportunities for US students and helping achieve the goal of "America first".

    Others see Harvard's welcoming of international students to attract top academic talent as "anti-American".

    "Why does Harvard have 25 percent of students from foreign countries. Why not tap more of the talent we are producing right here in our own country. Start being pro-American," one reader commented on a Wall Street Journal report.

    "I guess Harvard will get to show the courage of their convictions to the full extent. They are free to import all the antisemitic, radical leftist Nobel laureates and scientists they want on their own dime, with no support from the US taxpayer. Over time, patriotic Americans will stop sending their kids too," wrote WSJ reader Mel Everheart.

    "I say stop all student visas for 3 years and monitor the results. After that, create policies," wrote Steven Cohan.

    "No sympathy for Harvard. Like many of our 'elite' schools — Harvard has imported and promoted the very teachings that are now ripping our educational system apart. Being in America is a gift, evidently many, especially those at Harvard have forgotten this fact," commented Joshua Mervis on WSJ.

    |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next   >>|
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    制服中文字幕一区二区| 中文成人无码精品久久久不卡| 精品无码一区在线观看| 色综合久久中文综合网| 国产成人无码精品一区二区三区| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕无码中文字在线| 久久av无码专区亚洲av桃花岛| 制服在线无码专区| 免费A级毛片无码A∨中文字幕下载| 国产精品三级在线观看无码| 久久无码AV中文出轨人妻| 中文字幕人妻中文AV不卡专区 | 最好看的中文字幕2019免费| 精品无码国产污污污免费网站国产| 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 日本精品自产拍在线观看中文| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看素人| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕重口| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久| 天堂资源8中文最新版| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 久久久人妻精品无码一区| 精品无码AV无码免费专区| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线观看| 日韩AV无码一区二区三区不卡毛片| 日韩中文字幕在线视频| 最近2019中文免费字幕在线观看| 国产精品无码永久免费888| 人妻少妇偷人精品无码| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 无码少妇精品一区二区免费动态| 亚洲国产精品无码久久一区二区| 亚洲VA成无码人在线观看天堂| 最新中文字幕av无码专区| 久久精品无码一区二区WWW| 精品国产V无码大片在线看| 精品无码成人片一区二区98 | 欧美日本道中文高清| 中文字幕无码不卡在线| 亚洲高清中文字幕免费|