Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
    Opinion
    Home / Opinion / To the Point

    Winners and losers of a controversial US bill

    By GUO PING | China Daily | Updated: 2025-07-04 09:19
    Share
    Share - WeChat
    The US Capitol stands behind a US flag on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US, June 29, 2025. [Photo/Agencies]

    US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending proposal, commonly known as the "Big Beautiful Bill", was awaiting a vote on Wednesday in the House of Representatives after its passage by the narrowest of margins the day before in the Senate.

    The House, which narrowly passed the bill last month, now needs to approve the Senate's changes to the bill before it can head to Trump's desk for his signature prior to the July 4 deadline.

    The final showdown over the key legislation — which is expected to bring massive changes to taxes, federal spending and regulatory policies — comes following weeks of intense infighting within the Republicans and strong opposition from the Democrats and some business leaders such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Wednesday that every single Democrat will "vote hell no" against the policy package, which he called "one big ugly bill".

    One big controversy surrounding the package is that it contains $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would allow the country's richest to get the largest share, yet to make up for the lost revenue, federal funding on healthcare and food aid programs for the poor would be reduced by more than $1.3 trillion in the coming decade. This has prompted critics to question the erratic logic for wealth redistribution, which basically means taking from the country's poorest to give to the richest.

    Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Meanwhile, changes to federal nutrition assistance are set to strip millions of the poorest Americans of their access to food. Which partly explains why the bill is highly unpopular among US citizens. A survey by The Washington Post found that 42 percent of Americans opposed the bill, with only 23 percent supporting it.

    That the controversial bill is being rammed through Congress despite strong opposition underscores the polarization between the Republican and Democratic parties, which makes bipartisan compromise totally impossible. This has also contributed to widespread disillusion among US citizens about the country's ability to address the most pressing challenges that it faces nowadays in a timely way, given that under such a system the interests of the donors to a political party can often precede the interests of the nation and the majority of citizens who lack the wherewithal to promote their interests.

    One thing about the bill that seems to have upset opponents such as Musk the most is that its regulatory changes, rather than trying to embrace industries of the future, instead seek to promote industries of the past. The "Big Beautiful Bill" will dramatically roll back tax incentives designed to boost the electric vehicle industry and clean energy projects fueled by renewable sources such as wind and solar, while seeking to enhance domestic coal, oil and gas development.

    While this conforms to Trump's belief that clean energy tax credits are part of a "green new scam "that only helps the "globalist climate agenda", it obviously runs counter to the long-term interests of not only the US but also the world. These changes could kill jobs in future-focused industries and stifle innovation, as Musk observed, calling the legislation "utterly insane and destructive".

    Moreover, the legislation would increase federal deficits by nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade, exacerbating a problem that could cause greater economic risks and aggravate the country's financial woes. The US government for the first time spent more than $1 trillion last year on interest payments for its nearly $36 trillion national debt, which means the country is now spending more on net interest payments than on national defense and Medicare. The deficit-to-GDP ratio also worsened to 6.3 percent last year, much higher than the 3 percent that is considered "sustainable".

    The skyrocketing interest costs have been attributed to Washington's "insatiable appetite for borrowing and spending". It is estimated that interest costs will consume more than 20 percent of the nation's revenue by 2034.

    Before taking office, Trump promised to "restore fiscal sanity to our nation". The "Big Beautiful Bill" belies that pledge.

    Most Viewed in 24 Hours
    Top
    BACK TO THE TOP
    English
    Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
    License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

    Registration Number: 130349
    FOLLOW US
    成年无码av片在线| 日本乱中文字幕系列观看| 久久中文字幕无码专区| 99无码人妻一区二区三区免费| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久菠萝蜜| 夜夜精品无码一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲а∨无码播放| 国产又爽又黄无码无遮挡在线观看| 中文无码伦av中文字幕| 精品无码人妻久久久久久| 无码精品国产VA在线观看| 日日摸夜夜爽无码毛片精选| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 中文字字幕在线一本通| 久久亚洲av无码精品浪潮| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码专区在线在线播放| 中文字幕一区在线观看视频| 人妻丰满av无码中文字幕| 中文字字幕在线中文乱码不卡| 国产成人亚洲综合无码精品 | 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区| 天堂а√在线中文在线| 亚洲成a人无码av波多野按摩| 国产乱人无码伦av在线a| 国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件| 欧洲成人午夜精品无码区久久| 无码伊人66久久大杳蕉网站谷歌| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 中文字幕无码人妻AAA片| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久综合网| 免费看成人AA片无码视频吃奶| 久久久久精品国产亚洲AV无码| 精品无码免费专区毛片| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲AV人无码激艳猛片| 少妇伦子伦精品无码STYLES| 久久Av无码精品人妻系列| 秋霞无码一区二区| 久久精品无码一区二区无码 | 精品无码久久久久久国产|