久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Lens

New York Times got the Hong Kong fire completely wrong

By Adam Clermont | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-12-11 07:15
Share
Share - WeChat
Rescue operations are still underway at a residential area in Tai Po of Hong Kong, Nov 27, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

A recent New York Times article, "After Deadly Fire, Hong Kong Ominously Warns Grieving Citizens to Stay in Line", has circulated widely in Western and local circles. It presents itself as a sober examination of how Beijing uses tragedy as a pretext for control. It is also, quite simply, a story I do not recognize.

The fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po was a genuine catastrophe. The failures that led to this tragedy are specific and concrete. They include weak enforcement of fire-retardant standards on construction netting, poor maintenance of alarms that reportedly never sounded, renovation practices that appear to have emphasized speed and cost savings over safety despite repeated resident complaints dating back more than a year. They involve Hong Kong's own Buildings Department, Fire Services Department, Housing Authority and a network of local contractors and inspectors operating under Hong Kong's own regulations, most of them from the time Hong Kong was still under British rule. There are no secret orders telegraphed from Beijing.

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government's response has also been grounded in local institutions. Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu ordered territory-wide inspections of all public housing estates. The Independent Commission Against Corruption opened an investigation into possible corruption in the refurbishment contracts and has made multiple arrests. The police have launched a criminal inquiry into potential manslaughter by contractors and other responsible parties. These are recognizably the actions of Hong Kong agencies under Hong Kong law: ICAC, the police, the regulatory departments. Whether you consider them sufficient or not, they are clearly focused on accountability, not on silencing grief.

The New York Times article acknowledges some of this but only in passing, as decoration behind its main thesis. It calls it a sequel to a pre-written script about authoritarian reflexes that, the article claims, was seen after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. To sustain that script, it leans heavily on insinuation and carefully curated details, while omitting much of what local readers know immediately.

Consider how the piece presents the university student briefly detained after handing out leaflets calling for an "independent investigation". In the New York Times' telling, this is a purely "natural" response to a terrible disaster. In reality, his leaflet did not emerge spontaneously from raw grief. It was a calculated echo of the 2019 protest slogan "five demands, not one less", repackaged as "four big demands" around this fire: an inquiry, housing guarantees, policy changes, and a familiar rallying cry that every politically aware Hong Kong resident recognizes. He appeared dressed in black, the color that has become a visual shorthand for the 2019 black-clad protesters. The timing, the language, the imagery were crafted to connect this tragedy to that movement.

The same pattern appears in its treatment of the canceled news conference by lawyers, social workers and "policy experts". Readers are told that a news event was planned, an organizer was contacted by the police, and the event was then called off. The implication is left hanging: even measured professionals are now too terrified to speak. Left unsaid is who that lawyer is, what political causes he has publicly championed, which activist networks he has been linked with, and how closely his agenda aligns with those now attempting to turn the Tai Po fire into the next chapter of a long-running political campaign. Those facts do not disqualify him from concern; they simply matter to understanding the situation honestly.

I have learned, by actually living and working here, that Hong Kong is not the grim caricature painted in the Western media. People discuss government policies online and offline in a city with a low homicide rate, better public transport than any US metropolis, and a social safety net that the average US citizen can only dream of. To portray this as a population living in constant terror of speaking is simply untrue.

If the New York Times truly cared about State power and human rights in Hong Kong, it might also remind its readers of something else: what the US government itself has done on this soil. In the years after 9/11, a man transiting through Hong Kong International Airport was seized, handed over to US custody, and rendered to Libya, a country where he was tortured. This was not a theoretical textbook "playbook"; it was an actual kidnapping and rendition carried out with the involvement of US authorities, using Hong Kong as a convenient stage. The same Washington establishment that speaks today through anonymous officials and think tank experts in the pages of the Times has a long record of extraordinary rendition, black sites and torture. The New York Times reported some of this belatedly, but only after years of silence, euphemism or outright deference.

Against that record, the NYT's sudden posture as the moral arbiter of what constitutes "authoritarian" behavior in Hong Kong rings hollow. A newspaper that helped launder the myth of Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction" for a disastrous war; that blurred the line between fact and speculation throughout the Trump-Russia saga; that has repeatedly served as a willing channel for anonymous security-state narratives, is now asking us to treat its interpretation of a Hong Kong fire as holy writ. No thanks.

From my apartment in Hong Kong, I see grieving families at temporary altars, volunteers collecting supplies, neighbors offering spare rooms and meals. I see lawyers arguing over liability, engineers debating building codes, civil servants rushing to check thousands of estates whose facades suddenly look more dangerous than they did the month before. I see a government that makes mistakes, yes, but is clearly focused on finding out what went wrong and preventing it from happening again, not on crushing some imaginary uprising.

As a US solicitor in both Hong Kong and the US, and as a freelance reporter who has publicly defended media freedom here, I want foreign reporting on Hong Kong to be sharp and skeptical. I also want it to be honest enough to let reality disturb a comfortable narrative.

The author, a US citizen, is a practising solicitor admitted in both Hong Kong and the United States, and a freelance reporter based in Hong Kong.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    伊人国产在线视频| 日韩中文字幕在线免费| 日本xxxxxxxxxx75| 手机av在线网| 亚洲熟妇无码一区二区三区导航| 亚洲欧美视频二区| 国产深夜男女无套内射| 国产一级片中文字幕| 免费在线观看的av网站| 特级西西444| 亚洲 激情 在线| 国产视频一视频二| 久久www视频| 伊人五月天婷婷| 大香煮伊手机一区| 秋霞无码一区二区| 日本久久高清视频| 加勒比av中文字幕| 国产成人手机视频| jizzjizz国产精品喷水| 日韩国产小视频| 2025韩国大尺度电影| 亚洲性图一区二区| mm1313亚洲国产精品无码试看| 亚洲一区二区三区av无码| 无码人妻aⅴ一区二区三区日本| 自拍偷拍21p| 亚洲性生活网站| 日本黄色三级大片| 欧美极品欧美精品欧美| 人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 懂色av粉嫩av蜜臀av| www.成人黄色| 91丨九色丨蝌蚪| 手机在线成人免费视频| 日韩有码免费视频| 欧美激情成人网| 欧美激情成人网| 精品一卡二卡三卡| 播放灌醉水嫩大学生国内精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久电影网| 国产美女视频免费| 免费观看国产视频在线| 四虎免费在线观看视频| 国产又爽又黄ai换脸| 樱花草www在线| 国产一级不卡视频| 欧美一级爱爱视频| 国产 欧美 日本| 国产成人永久免费视频| 国产肉体ⅹxxx137大胆| 欧美这里只有精品| 日韩中字在线观看| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 99视频在线免费播放| 黄色动漫网站入口| 苍井空浴缸大战猛男120分钟| 国产亚洲精品网站| 久久久精品三级| 鲁一鲁一鲁一鲁一av| 午夜免费福利视频在线观看| 日本高清一区二区视频| 999久久久精品视频| 六月婷婷激情网| 精品少妇人欧美激情在线观看| 久无码久无码av无码| 乱妇乱女熟妇熟女网站| 日本黄网站免费| 国产日韩欧美久久| 亚洲美女自拍偷拍| 久久久亚洲国产精品| 欧美日韩在线中文| 天天干天天玩天天操| 国产对白在线播放| 成年人网站免费视频| 91热这里只有精品| 中文字幕色网站| 日韩一级特黄毛片| 久久久久久久激情| 欧洲在线免费视频| 成人免费观看在线| 久久综合久久色| 男人的天堂成人| 欧美网站免费观看| 天天操天天干天天做| 丁香色欲久久久久久综合网| 成人在线激情网| 黄色三级视频在线播放| 激情小视频网站| 日本女人高潮视频| aa视频在线播放| 五月婷婷丁香色| av在线免费观看国产| 成人亚洲视频在线观看| 日本特黄在线观看| 男人揉女人奶房视频60分| 亚洲天堂国产视频| 久久久久免费看黄a片app| 777视频在线| 日韩黄色短视频| 日本不卡一区二区在线观看| 美脚丝袜脚交一区二区| 黄色手机在线视频| 久久国产精品网| 中文字幕丰满乱码| 欧美,日韩,国产在线| 激情文学亚洲色图| 久久无码高潮喷水| 福利网在线观看| 中文字幕第80页| 亚洲理论电影在线观看| 嫩草视频免费在线观看| 国产精品无码av在线播放| 日韩欧美中文视频| 久久久久国产精品熟女影院| 国产在线视频在线| www.成年人| 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区浪潮 | 青少年xxxxx性开放hg| 女人扒开屁股爽桶30分钟| 在线观看污视频| 天天干天天操天天玩| 97在线播放视频| 成人av在线播放观看| 午夜大片在线观看| 欧美黑人又粗又大又爽免费| 免费拍拍拍网站| 精品一区二区三区毛片| 在线观看免费不卡av| 污污视频网站免费观看| 91国视频在线| 成人短视频在线观看免费| 天堂网成人在线| 午夜免费看视频| 已婚少妇美妙人妻系列| 北条麻妃在线视频观看| 欧美午夜性视频| 成人在线免费观看视频网站| 久久精品一卡二卡| 亚欧激情乱码久久久久久久久| 一本色道无码道dvd在线观看| 欧美在线一区视频| 999一区二区三区| japanese在线播放| 黄色网址在线免费看| 国产系列第一页| 九九热视频免费| 天天干天天色天天干| 成人综合久久网| www.com黄色片| 少妇一级淫免费放| 成人免费xxxxx在线视频| 国产精品免费成人| 国产福利一区视频| 成人亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲乱码国产一区三区| 欧美日韩一区二区在线免费观看| 六月丁香激情网| 成人毛片视频网站| 免费裸体美女网站| 爱情岛论坛vip永久入口| 老头吃奶性行交视频| 国产素人在线观看| 黄色网在线视频| 国产一线二线三线女| 日韩av在线播放不卡| 你懂的av在线| 三级4级全黄60分钟| 99久久国产宗和精品1上映| 一道本视频在线观看| 国产小视频精品| 欧美这里只有精品| 国产中文字幕二区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久久酒店新书| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 黄色免费网址大全| 99re6在线观看| 91九色国产ts另类人妖| 日本男女交配视频| 国产精品333| www.日本一区| 熟女视频一区二区三区| 国产日本在线播放| 成人免费观看毛片| 天堂av8在线| 成人污网站在线观看| 99精品人妻少妇一区二区| caopor在线视频| 手机福利在线视频| 日本在线xxx| 天堂一区在线观看| 99久久99久久精品| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 污污网站在线观看视频| 奇米777四色影视在线看| 国产中文字幕免费观看| 国产九九在线观看| 国产美女作爱全过程免费视频| 日本免费一级视频| 天天综合成人网|