Opinion

    Balancing wealth distribution

    By Zhang Monan (China Daily)
    Updated: 2011-04-25 13:28
    Large Medium Small

    Property tax urgently needed to bridge the widening gap between the haves and have-nots and improve social services

    The State Council's planned increase of the individual income tax threshold from the current 2,000 yuan ($306) a month to 3,000 yuan symbolizes an important step toward narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor and resolving the country's income distribution disparity.

    However, a property tax, a tax aimed at taxing people's accumulated wealth, is more desperately needed to reverse the country's wealth distribution momentum.

    Related readings:
    Balancing wealth distribution China to encourage dividend distribution
    Balancing wealth distribution China to readjust income distribution to stop yawning gap
    Balancing wealth distribution China strives to readjust income distribution
    Balancing wealth distribution China's fair income distribution to be ensured

    Imbalances in social wealth distribution have proven more serious than income distribution imbalances in the world's most populous nation.

    By the end of 2009, the number of families with more than $1 million had reached 670,000, ranking the country third in the world for millionaires, only the United States and Japan had more. However, wealthy families in China only account for 0.2 percent of the country's total number of households, a proportion that is far lower than that in other countries. For instance, the proportion is 4.1 percent of households in the US and 8.4 percent in Switzerland.

    A recent survey jointly conducted by China's Merchant Bank and Bain & Company, a global management consulting firm, indicates that in 2010, 500,000 Chinese people were able to make an investment of 100 million yuan or above, and they held combined investment-capable assets of 15 trillion yuan. The survey also shows that China's wealth flow to wealthy people is accelerating at an annual growth rate of 12.3 percent, twice the world's average.

    Accelerating wealth distribution imbalances will cause more damage to society than disparities in personal income distribution. Not only will it further widen the wealth-accumulation gap between different groups in society it will also pass such wealth imbalances on to the next generation.

    According to a survey conducted by the Boston Consulting Group, the number of people with personal property worth more than $1 million increased 14 percent globally in 2009. It increased 31 percent in China, the fourth highest growth rate in the world. The large volumes of financial assets owned by wealthy people in China will unavoidably widen the wealth gap between the rich and the poor.

    To effectively avert the intensified Matthew Effect in social wealth distribution, where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, China should launch comprehensive institutional reforms.

    Undoubtedly, the increased individual income tax threshold is an important step toward reforming the country's taxation system, which is meant to regulate the wealth gap and promote a reasonable distribution of social resources. However, regulation of personal income distribution alone is not enough. What the country should do more urgently is improve its property reporting system and levy taxes on all kinds of properties of a person, including his or her real estate, capital earnings, inherited property, and donations.

    In developed countries, a set of well-developed property taxes has been established as a major means to correct and regulate wealth distribution imbalances. Statistics show that in the US, Britain and Canada, property taxes account for more than 9 percent of their fiscal revenues. The proportion is 5 to 7 percent in Japan, New Zealand and Australia. Even within the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) members, property tax accounts for 3.1 percent of fiscal revenues. In China, however, the proportion is much lower, meaning the tax fails to play its due role in regulating social wealth distribution.

    In many developed countries, property taxes are mostly used to develop the social security system. For example, the lion's shares of property taxes in the US are used for education.

    China should also optimize its taxation management system and moderately shift its taxation power from the central government to lower-level governments to extricate some local governments from their excessive dependence on "land-based" revenue policy. Statistics show that China's local governments earned a total of 2.7 trillion yuan from selling land in 2010, an increase of 69.4 percent on 2009. The income from land sales accounted for 71 percent of local governments' fiscal revenues, 22.2 percentage points higher than the previous year.

    To free local governments from their land-dependent revenue, the current fiscal policy that is excessively tilted to the central government should be changed, a move that would help local governments assume more responsibility for offering public services.

    China should try to set up a taxation system based on the accurate evaluation of the value of people's properties as soon as possible. This will not only help China ease its ever-widening gap in wealth distribution, but will also help gradually establish fair and highly-efficient central and local fiscal systems.

    The author is an economics analyst with the State Information Center.

    (China Daily 04/25/2011 page8)

    分享按鈕
    最近中文字幕视频在线资源| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看素人| 人妻无码久久精品| 最近的2019免费中文字幕| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区| 无码成人一区二区| 中文字幕毛片| 精品亚洲欧美中文字幕在线看| 国产精品无码久久久久| 亚洲精品无码久久久久| 久久精品中文字幕一区| 欧美日本道中文高清| 91久久九九无码成人网站| 亚洲AV永久青草无码精品| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区| 亚洲va中文字幕无码久久| 无码少妇一区二区浪潮av| 久热中文字幕无码视频| 亚洲一区爱区精品无码| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99性 | 国精品无码A区一区二区| 亚洲AV无码成人专区片在线观看| 四虎影视无码永久免费| 中文自拍日本综合| 伊人蕉久中文字幕无码专区| 久久中文精品无码中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文在线| 最近中文字幕精彩视频| 公和熄小婷乱中文字幕| 日本精品自产拍在线观看中文| 最近免费最新高清中文字幕韩国 | 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 中文字幕无码乱人伦| 久久中文字幕精品| 色综合中文综合网| 欧美日韩中文字幕久久伊人| 最近免费中文字幕mv电影| 中文自拍日本综合| 亚洲AV无码久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲AV综合色区无码一区爱AV| 日韩精品中文字幕无码一区|