US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Opinion

    How real is the tax burden

    By Jia Kang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-03-04 08:22

    The debate on the tax burden is growing among Chinese as they become more conscious about being taxpayers. A recent Chinese Academy of Social Sciences report has added vigor to that debate by saying that "the per capita tax burden in China is nearly 10,000 yuan ($1,633)".

    Perhaps taxpayers' misconception about "per capita tax burden" is to blame for the renewed debate. "Per capita tax burden" is the same as "average fiscal revenue". Academics and government officials are known to use the concept of "macro tax burden", which takes into account the ratio of total government revenue in a country's GDP. But the concept of "per capita tax burden" is relatively new to us.

    How real is the tax burden

    How real is the tax burden

     
    The difference in the expressions of "per capita tax burden" and "average fiscal revenue" can be significant. Although the two terms refer to the same thing economically, people could derive different meanings from them. If we quantify the tax burden to every single citizen, people will dislike it. But they will be more than happy to accept an increase in average fiscal revenue.

    The "macro tax burden" index can be more meaningful while measuring a country's tax burden, because the ratio of fiscal revenue accounting for GDP can better reflect the concentration ratio of government financial resources in a specific economic structure, and manifest certain fiscal and taxation systems. It also can analyze the characteristics of an economy's financial allocation and the government's role in controlling its resources for administration.

    If we compare this index with the international level, going by the International Monetary Fund's standards, China's current ratio is less than 35 percent, which is the average of developing countries but much lower than that of advanced economies. This means China's macro tax burden is not that high and there is little sense in introducing a "per capita tax" index by quantifying the macro tax burden to individuals. For one thing, it can easily cause misunderstandings among the public. In China, less than 10 percent of the government's total tax comes directly from individuals, with companies paying more than 90 percent. This is because the tax system is aimed at redistributing social wealth from better-off groups to the poorer ones.

    A deeper analysis of the tax burden, however, will show that not all the amount companies pay as taxes comes from their own pockets. Except for the corporate income tax, companies pass on the other taxes such as value-added tax and business tax to parties down the supply/delivery chain or ultimately to consumers. Such a tax is called "indirect tax". In China, indirect tax makes up the main part of the tax system, and it is the key to understanding the tax burden issue.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    ...
    在线亚洲欧美中文精品| 亚洲精品无码成人片在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人精品无码久久久久久综合 | 无码AⅤ精品一区二区三区| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦| 天堂无码在线观看| 日日摸日日碰夜夜爽无码| 中文字幕国产视频| 最近中文字幕在线中文视频| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码| 亚洲AV无码日韩AV无码导航| 久久中文字幕视频、最近更新| 亚洲最大av无码网址| 国产av永久无码天堂影院| 亚洲欧洲美洲无码精品VA| 最好看的电影2019中文字幕 | 日木av无码专区亚洲av毛片| 精品国产aⅴ无码一区二区| 日本免费中文字幕| 中文字幕乱码人在线视频1区 | 爆操夜夜操天天操中文| 人妻无码αv中文字幕久久琪琪布| 国产亚洲大尺度无码无码专线 | 国产 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 高h纯肉无码视频在线观看| 亚洲色无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区| 最近中文字幕2019高清免费 | 中文字幕人妻无码专区| 中文字幕丰满乱子无码视频| 国产高新无码在线观看| 国产精品午夜无码AV天美传媒 | 久久久久久无码国产精品中文字幕| 午夜人性色福利无码视频在线观看| 最近免费中文字幕MV在线视频3| 亚洲精品无码久久久久AV麻豆| 亚洲爆乳无码精品AAA片蜜桃| 亚洲区日韩区无码区| 伊人久久无码精品中文字幕| 麻豆国产原创中文AV网站| 无码精品日韩中文字幕|