US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Companies

    BOC weighs legal options against US court ruling

    By Li Xiang (China Daily) Updated: 2015-12-03 07:05

    BOC weighs legal options against US court ruling

    An advertisement for Bank of China in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei province, May 9, 2015. [Photo/IC]

    Lender slapped with daily fines of $50,000 for withholding client account information

    Bank of China Ltd is seeking to appeal against a United States court order that imposes $50,000 daily fine on it for withholding information, its legal advisers said on Wednesday.

    The State-owned lender was held in contempt by a US court for refusing to provide account details of Chinese customers accused of selling counterfeit luxury goods. The US court said the daily fines would be imposed from next Tuesday, unless BOC complies with the subpoena request for client information.

    BOC has been involved in the legal dispute that stemmed from a case in 2010. Gucci, the luxury brand of Paris-based Kering SA, sued owners and operators of a Chinese website for trademark infringement, online sales of imitation handbags and other items.

    The bank, which is not a defendant in the Gucci case, has claimed that it has been caught in between the conflicts of the legal systems of China and the US.

    Jiang Ying, a lawyer at Allen & Overy, the law firm representing BOC, said that the fine is "unfair" for the bank, which is "innocently involved" in the case and it would put the bank in a dilemma of violating Chinese laws if it has to comply with the US laws.

    The incident underscored the growing legal disputes facing Chinese financial institutions in the US under the controversial Long-Arm Statue, a legal provision that allows US courts to exercise jurisdiction over foreign entities, provided that the prospective defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the US, legal experts said.

    Jiang said that the involved parties should be able to invoke the multilateral Hague Evidence Convention to resolve the dispute. The Hague procedure enables the plaintiff to obtain evidence, including bank account information, under the Chinese legal procedures.

    Had Gucci opted to use the Hague Convention, they would have obtained the information they seek long before now, Jiang said.

    Gucci also has the option to sue the defendants in China and obtain Chinese court's assistance in obtaining information and freezing accounts.

    Jiang said that she is aware of at least three cases where the counsel representing Gucci successfully used Chinese courts to do so in recent years.

    While it is hard to guess whether BOC will win its appeal, Jiang said the case will far reaching impact on Chinese companies and all foreign businesses in the US affected by the long-arm jurisdiction.

    Shi Jinjuan, a partner of law firm Dacheng Dentons in Shanghai said the Bank of China dispute represents a major legal challenge in information disclosure for Chinese companies. It could also hit future Chinese investments in the US.

    "If the court ruling goes against the bank, Chinese companies may become more cautious or even less willing to invest, set up offices or list their shares in the US," she said.

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    欧美日韩中文字幕在线| 久久久人妻精品无码一区| 国产亚洲精品无码拍拍拍色欲| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲| 蜜桃视频无码区在线观看| 小13箩利洗澡无码视频网站| 国产一区三区二区中文在线 | 亚洲av无码成人黄网站在线观看| 中文字幕乱妇无码AV在线| 国产精品无码无需播放器| 曰批全过程免费视频在线观看无码| 99久久中文字幕| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区免费 | 熟妇人妻无乱码中文字幕真矢织江 | 亚洲Av无码专区国产乱码不卡 | A级毛片无码久久精品免费| 亚洲va无码专区国产乱码| 国产成人无码区免费内射一片色欲| 久久精品中文闷骚内射| 在线观看免费无码视频| 日韩精品久久无码人妻中文字幕| 在线观看片免费人成视频无码| 国产精品亚洲w码日韩中文| 中文字幕视频一区| 日本乱中文字幕系列观看| 色噜噜狠狠成人中文综合| 中文字幕无码人妻AAA片| 忘忧草在线社区WWW中国中文| 狠狠躁狠狠爱免费视频无码| 18禁黄无码高潮喷水乱伦| av区无码字幕中文色| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩| 无码一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕无码爆乳AV| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产麻豆| 无码国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 精品无码一区在线观看| 精品无码综合一区| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕不卡 久久精品人妻中文系列 | 中文字幕第3页|