US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Gadgets

    Apple seeks decisive US court ruling against Samsung

    (Agencies) Updated: 2014-04-02 17:31

    Quinn, however, pointed to a 2011 document written by Jobs, saying Apple was in a "Holy War" with Google and that the iPhone maker was in danger of losing its advantage as an innovator in the smartphone market.

    On the stand, Apple's Schiller rehashed testimony from previous trials and said "competition is great."

    But Schiller described his shock at seeing the similarities between Samsung's smartphones and the iPhone. Under questioning from Samsung attorney William Price, however, Schiller said he was not familiar with the specific patent claims Apple was asserting in the case.

    In rejecting Apple's previous bid for a sales ban, Koh wrote that a consumer survey Apple submitted in the 2012 trial likely inflated the value that customers place on the smartphone features in dispute, meaning Apple does not merit an injunction. Apple is appealing that decision.

    Apple has hired the same marketing expert to conduct a new consumer survey for the current trial. But this latest effort contains additional analysis about how Apple's patented features drive consumer demand, according to court filings.

    While the prior survey only concluded that there was general demand for the patented features, the new study attempts to quantify the proportion of customers Samsung would have lost if its smartphones did not contain those features, court filings show.

    Samsung tried to stop Apple from presenting that evidence to the jury, arguing that the methodology was unsound. However, Koh agreed in a February ruling to allow Apple to use the study.

    McElhinny told jurors that Samsung disabled its infringing search technology after Apple sued, but then restored it due to consumer demand. That demonstrates the value of Apple's features, he said.

    Quinn responded that the reason Samsung restored the search technology had nothing to do with consumer demand. Rather, Samsung received permission to restore the feature after an appeals court reversed legal rulings that had limited its use.

    The trial is expected to last until early May.

    Apple seeks decisive US court ruling against Samsung

    Apple seeks decisive US court ruling against Samsung
    Apple Inc sues China on IP Apple Inc out, home brands in

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    ...
    无码超乳爆乳中文字幕久久| 久久AV无码精品人妻糸列| 亚洲欧美在线一区中文字幕| 黄A无码片内射无码视频| 精品久久久久久久中文字幕| 人妻少妇看A偷人无码精品| 蜜桃臀AV高潮无码| 亚洲精品无码永久中文字幕| 精品少妇无码AV无码专区| 中文字幕无码日韩专区免费| 色综合久久最新中文字幕| 无码毛片一区二区三区中文字幕 | 久久亚洲精品无码播放| 中文字幕丰满乱子伦无码专区| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 亚洲AV永久无码区成人网站| 中文字幕在线无码一区| 中文精品久久久久国产网址| 天堂在线资源中文在线8| 国产精品xxxx国产喷水亚洲国产精品无码久久一区 | 久久无码专区国产精品发布 | 欧美日韩中文字幕在线| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 18无码粉嫩小泬无套在线观看| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品 | 午夜不卡无码中文字幕影院| 特级做A爰片毛片免费看无码| 亚洲精品一级无码中文字幕| 国产AV无码专区亚洲精品| 人妻无码一区二区三区免费| 久久亚洲AV无码西西人体| 国产精品无码无卡无需播放器| 久久男人Av资源网站无码软件 | 亚洲大尺度无码无码专区| 毛片免费全部播放无码| 中文字幕在线无码一区二区三区| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区老年| 中文字幕乱码人妻综合二区三区| 亚洲毛片网址在线观看中文字幕| 性无码专区一色吊丝中文字幕|