Opinion

    Share emissions reduction burden

    By Feng Zhaokui (China Daily)
    Updated: 2010-08-11 15:34
    Large Medium Small

    In recognition of fundamental changes to the way governments approach energy-related environmental issues, the International Energy Agency (IEA) produces each year a report on CO2 emissions from fuel combustion.

    The report started publication in 1997 and is designed to help people understand the evolution of CO2 emissions sector-wise and by fuel in more than 140 countries and regions. It has ever since become an essential tool for analysts and policymakers.

    Related readings:
    Share emissions reduction burden WB report highlights public policy's role in emission cuts
    Share emissions reduction burden Domestic system for carbon trading
    Share emissions reduction burden Carbon trading in pipeline
    Share emissions reduction burden China may spend $738b on clean energy projects

    In the 2008 edition, the IEA said China's CO2 emissions volume totaled 5.649 billion tons, second to the 5.697 billion tons of emissions by the United States, the world's biggest CO2 emitter.

    The publication however noted that China's per capita CO2 emission volume was 4.28 tons, less than 23 percent, 39 percent and 45.1 percent respectively that of the US, Russia and Japan.

    Undoubtedly, the calculation, both on a per capita and national basis, indicates that the IEA attaches importance not only to a country's whole CO2 emission volumes but also to its per capita emissions.

    The agency has however failed to clarify whether its per capita data is based on a country's citizens or on its residents, no matter whether they are citizens or non-nationals. The two different statistical methods will lead to two distinctive statistical results.

    Of a country's nationals, some possibly live and engage in certain kinds of production activity not in their own country, which will cause some CO2 emissions in other countries or regions. Similarly, for a specific country, there are surely some non-national residents living and engaging in production activity that lead to increased CO2 emissions within the country's territory.

    As economic globalization deepens, it has become very common for a country's gross national product (GNP) to often diverge from its gross domestic product (GDP). That is partly the result of globalization, which has facilitated the flow of people among different countries and their production activity in non-native soil. As a result, some parts of a country's final product and labor value, although still belonging to its GNP, are calculated as forming other countries' GDP value.

    Given that any production activity will unavoidably cause some CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, it has become an obvious fact that all countries' gross national emission (GNE), a CO2 emission statistical data directly based on production activity of their own nationals, is always different from their gross domestic emission (GDE), the volume of CO2 emissions caused by all their residents, including nationals and non-nationals, within their territories.

    There may be some who argue that there is not much difference between a country's GNE and its GDE. For a majority of countries, this is likely the case. But for those that have absorbed a large amount of foreign direct investment (FDI), the situation is completely different.

    If a number of foreign-funded and joint venture companies set up production bases in a country, its CO2 emissions volume caused by these foreign producers would be quite significant.

    Take China for instance. Due to its enormous investment opportunities and the growing attractiveness of its ever-expanding domestic market to foreign investors, China has absorbed about 20 percent of the world's total foreign direct investment that has flowed in to developing countries over the past 10 years, according to a World Bank report.

    As more and more foreign-funded ventures conduct various kinds of production activities on Chinese soil, CO2 emissions caused by non-Chinese people within its territory have been on the increase.

    In an era of economic globalization, economic interlinks among different countries have grown stronger and population flows more common, which has added to cross-national CO2 emissions among different countries.

    Against this backdrop, we should actively push for mutual exchange among world members and work harder to promote closer cooperation among them in energy conservation and emission reductions in a bid to save our overburdened globe from collapsing due to the ever-deteriorating environmental crisis.

    The clarification between the GNE and the GDE will help the whole world look at all countries' CO2 emissions in an all-round and scientific perspective, and then help them make scientific and reasonable commitments on CO2 emission reductions that comply with their national conditions.

    For those China-based foreign enterprises that cause CO2 emissions in local regions, they should become more cooperative and work together with Chinese people toward reducing emissions from the country's soil.

    The author is a researcher with the Institute of Finance and Banking under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

    天堂а在线中文在线新版| 日韩a级无码免费视频| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区| 无码日韩人妻AV一区二区三区 | 国产羞羞的视频在线观看 国产一级无码视频在线 | 国产成人午夜无码电影在线观看| yellow中文字幕久久网| 精品久久久久久无码人妻蜜桃| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV手机麻豆| 中文有无人妻vs无码人妻激烈| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 日本一区二区三区精品中文字幕 | 亚洲精品无码久久不卡| 人妻夜夜添夜夜无码AV| 东京热人妻无码一区二区av| 中文字幕亚洲精品资源网| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲视频| 91久久九九无码成人网站| 无码午夜成人1000部免费视频| 无码国产精品一区二区免费虚拟VR | 毛片免费全部播放无码| √天堂中文www官网在线| 国产在线精品一区二区中文| 中文在线中文A| 国产精品中文久久久久久久| 国产激情无码一区二区app| 在线天堂资源www在线中文| 波多野结衣在线aⅴ中文字幕不卡| 漂亮人妻被中出中文字幕久久| 亚洲高清无码在线观看| 国产精品无码一区二区在线观一| 无码日韩精品一区二区免费| 亚洲啪啪AV无码片| 伊人久久综合精品无码AV专区| 无码夫の前で人妻を犯す中字| 亚洲av午夜国产精品无码中文字| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 中文字幕你懂的| 日韩欧美一区二区三区中文精品| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕|