久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

Chinadaily.com.cn
 
Go Adv Search

Carbon emissions: a taxing problem for air transport

Updated: 2012-03-19 09:10

By Cecily Liu and Zhang Haizhou in London and Lan Lan in Beijing (China Daily)

  Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small

Carbon emissions: a taxing problem for air transport

An Air China plane at an airport in Zhengzhou, Henan province. As the EU's carbon tax scheme arouses opposition from a number of countries, there are signs the trading bloc could soften its stance. [Photo / China Daily]

EU's strategy of levying a climate tax on airlines has provoked widespread criticism

The European Union has hinted that it hopes to avoid levying its controversial carbon-emissions tax on flights from China, if Beijing introduces its own carbon-trading scheme to cover aviation.

However, the debate is set to continue after China responded by saying that it will take time to set up its own market for the trade in carbon emissions.

Peter Liese, a member of the European Parliament and rapporteur for the inclusion of aviation in the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), said that the EU is willing to negotiate with China.

"We have noticed with great interest that there are discussions about an emissions trading scheme in China. If this scheme also covered aviation, we could exempt flights from China to the European Union," said Liese.

Starting this year, all airlines using EU airports are required to buy permits under the ETS. However, many non-EU countries, including China and the United States, have opposed the scheme and criticized it for being "unilateral".

Jiang Kejun, a researcher at the Energy Research Institute of China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), said that Liese's suggestion would be feasible if China can set up an emissions trading market.

"It would avoid (paying) double fees. However, it will take time for China to build its carbon emissions trading market," Jiang said.

China has selected seven provinces and cities, including Beijing and Tianjin, to begin preparations for the pilot. Energy-intensive and highly polluting industries are likely to be included in the project.

"It's too early to talk about aviation because it must be based on a nationwide carbon emissions trading market. The regional pilot projects were unable to cover aviation," said Jiang.

Tensions escalated in February when representatives of 32 countries gathered in Moscow to discuss potential retaliatory measures against the scheme.

Following the meeting, Su Wei, director-general of the climate change department under the National Development and Reform Commission, said that the EU scheme violates international law.

For example, the Kyoto Protocol makes a distinction between the efforts that developed and developing nations have to make to address climate change, but these "differentiated responsibilities" are not accounted for in the EU ETS.

Liese criticized the Moscow gathering for not offering an alternative solution to tackle carbon emissions, but revealed that "behind the scenes, China, the US and others are negotiating on real solutions with the European Union", something he feels "optimistic" about.

Zhou Dadi, former director of the energy research institute of the NDRC, said that China will base its policy decisions "on Chinese conditions rather than buying the medicine based on the prescription given by the EU".

He explained that China is actively exploring effective measures, including establishing a carbon emissions trading market and imposing energy and carbon taxes to support low carbon development.

The top priority for China is to introduce energy and resource pricing reforms this year, laying a foundation for the carbon market and carbon taxes, he added.

Airlines' outcry

Airlines from both EU and non-EU countries have criticized the ETS for distorting competition.

"The current scheme is neither global nor fair," said Frank Puttmann, director of group communications at Lufthansa AG, Europe's largest airline by passenger numbers and fleet size.

Puttmann said that European airlines will suffer disproportionately from the scheme, because rival airlines that only use EU airports for some of their flights will be in a better position to spread the costs.

Lufthansa is expected to incur an additional expense of 130 million euros ($171 million) in 2012. "The additional cost for emission certificates will reduce our financial ability to invest in new eco-efficient technology, for example modern and fuel-efficient aircraft or engines," said Puttmann.

Finnair OYJ expects to incur additional costs of 5 million euros in 2012. Kati Ihamaki, vice-president of sustainable development at the airline, said that "passing on costs to (ticket) prices will be difficult, because emissions trading will not apply to all international airlines equally".

Goh Choon Phong, CEO of Singapore Airlines Ltd, said that the EU ETS is unfair as it only charges airlines for the leg of a journey in and out of Europe.

Carbon emissions: a taxing problem for air transport

"Under the system, an airline that makes its passengers fly with a halt somewhere close to Europe will pay less than an airline that flies non-stop, even though the former would have used more fuel," he said.

James Hogan, CEO of Etihad Airways, the national carrier of the United Arab Emirates, said: "We have invested many millions of dollars to ensure that we operate a young and highly efficient fleet, but are still being penalized."

Etihad has increased ticket prices for flights in and out of Europe by $3 from this month.

Victoria Moore, general manager for communications at the Association of European Airlines, said that AEA members have only made a per-passenger profit of 2 euros and 40 cents over the last decade.

The AEA estimates that member airlines have only made an average profit of 0.8 percent per passenger over the past decade, while the International Air Transport Association (IATA) said that its members have only generated cumulative profit in three of the past ten years.

Despite the high costs of compliance, Simon Retallack, strategy manager of the London-based non-profit company The Carbon Trust, believes that the aviation industry "needs to play a part in order to help avoid the risks associated with dangerous climate change".

Dirk Willem te Velde of the Overseas Development Institute, a London-based think tank, said that in the absence of a global tax, the EU's ETS is a viable solution to global climate change because, based on fleet sizes, the developed nations will pay much more under the scheme, while emerging countries will pay less.

The AEA estimates that costs of compliance for its 33 member airlines will amount to 9.9 billion euros between 2012 and 2020. In comparison, the China Air Transport Association estimates a compliance cost of 17.6 billion yuan ($2.8bn) for Chinese airlines over the same period.

The 2012 payments will be calculated after each airline's annual carbon output has been added up, and will be paid in early 2013.

The EU first launched the ETS in 2005 to fulfill its own emissions-reduction targets under the Kyoto Protocol. Airlines were not originally included in the scheme because the protocol made the United Nation's International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) responsible for reducing the environmental impact of the aviation industry.

The EU proposed extending its ETS to aviation in 2006 because of what it saw as a lack of progress on the issue at ICAO.

For the EU, the inclusion of aviation in the ETS is a matter of common sense. Last year, Connie Hedegaard, the EU's commissioner for climate action, said: "Emissions from aviation are growing faster than from any other sector, and all forecasts indicate that they will continue to do so under 'business-as-usual' conditions."

But the move has aroused fierce international opposition. Last year, the US Air Transport Association attempted to stop the scheme. In a case presented to the European Court of Justice, the ATA argued that tackling emissions must be undertaken on a global basis.

The US airlines lost the case. The ECJ's Advocate-General Juliane Kokott said the EU was within its rights to take unilateral action because the ICAO has not yielded significant progress after more than a decade in operation.

Increasingly, the imminent threat of a trade war has led both EU politicians and airline associations to pressure the ICAO into urgently offering a global solution.

"We don't want a trade war," said Tony Tyler, director-general of IATA. "Europe's unilateral and extra-territorial EU ETS plans are clearly not acceptable to non-EU governments. We hope that the European states will be sincere facilitators at the ICAO."

Meanwhile, an ICAO working paper obtained by China Daily shows that the ICAO plans to "develop possible options for a global market-based-measure scheme by June 2012 for consideration by the (European) Council".

Conflicting laws

How Chinese airlines will respond to the scheme remains uncertain, because they are being instructed to take contradictory action by the Chinese and European governments.

The Civil Aviation Administration of China has formally instructed airlines not to join the EU ETS without government approval.

But the EU is not backing down. Airlines that do not comply will be fined 100 euros for each tonne of carbon dioxide emitted for which they have not surrendered allowances.

"Chinese airlines are stuck between two conflicting laws, and resolution can only come through negotiations between the two governments to achieve a compromise," said Mark Bisset, an aviation-finance partner at Clyde & Co LLP, a law firm headquartered in London.

The EU ETS legislation exempts flights from countries with "equivalent measures" to tackle carbon emissions, but Bisset said those "equivalent measures" are not defined in the legislation.

"The danger is that when EU airlines see Chinese airlines being excluded from the scheme based on measures by the Chinese government they do not believe are equivalent, they will take actions against the European Council," Bisset said.

For example, British Airways, part of the International Airlines Group, has endorsed the EU ETS. But a company spokesperson said: "We believe that any concessions which might be made to non-EU airlines should also be applied to EU airlines operating on the same routes."

Meanwhile, South Africa is planning to introduce its own emissions trading scheme later this year, a move not supported by the African Airlines Association (AFRAA).

Elijah Chingosho, secretary-general of AFRAA, said: "it is wrong for different countries to come up with their own emissions trading schemes, be they EU countries or any other countries."

Australia is also planning to introduce its own emissions-trading scheme in 2015, and intends to link it with the EU ETS.

Contact the writers at cecily.liu@chinadaily.com.cn. 

Carbon emissions: a taxing problem for air transport

Related Stories

China registers sharp drop in carbon intensity 2011-11-10 07:52
Low-carbon concept counts in progress 2011-12-19 07:49
EU carbon tax 2012-03-10 07:57
EU to keep carbon tax 2012-03-10 07:59
Buyers default on carbon credits 2012-02-09 08:10
Carbon market has 'potential' 2011-11-17 10:10
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    久久久精品麻豆| 免费看污黄网站| 日韩肉感妇bbwbbwbbw| 国产奶头好大揉着好爽视频| 人妻av中文系列| 51自拍视频在线观看| 日韩少妇内射免费播放18禁裸乳| 五月天中文字幕在线| 欧美国产亚洲一区| 一区二区三区四区久久| 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区浪潮| 久久精品一二三四| 99视频在线视频| 大j8黑人w巨大888a片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区不卡| chinese少妇国语对白| 日韩 欧美 视频| xxww在线观看| 成人小视频在线看| 久久av综合网| 4444在线观看| www.桃色.com| 久久久久久久久久久久91| 熟女少妇在线视频播放| 潘金莲一级淫片aaaaa免费看| 中文字幕欧美人妻精品一区| 给我免费播放片在线观看| 青少年xxxxx性开放hg| 我看黄色一级片| 黄色免费观看视频网站| 成人av在线不卡| 久久国产精品免费观看| 色婷婷激情视频| www.色就是色| 黄色免费网址大全| 高清在线观看免费| 亚洲不卡中文字幕无码| 人妻av无码专区| 欧美激情亚洲天堂| 大地资源网在线观看免费官网| 伊人国产精品视频| 潘金莲激情呻吟欲求不满视频| 99精品免费在线观看| 欧美国产亚洲一区| 日本少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲色婷婷久久精品av蜜桃| 午夜免费视频网站| 大桥未久一区二区| 亚洲欧美偷拍另类| 波多野结衣天堂| 亚洲免费看av| 欧美女同在线观看| 亚洲精品性视频| 亚洲色图 在线视频| 国产精品入口免费软件| 亚洲欧美自偷自拍另类| 亚洲欧美日韩一级| 在线能看的av网站| 午夜天堂在线视频| 日本一二三四区视频| 精品嫩模一区二区三区| 视色,视色影院,视色影库,视色网| 中国一级大黄大黄大色毛片| 中国一级大黄大黄大色毛片| 黑人巨茎大战欧美白妇| 国产高清av在线播放| 99热在线这里只有精品| 久久久久久久久久福利| 欧美午夜aaaaaa免费视频| 日本美女视频一区| 久久视频免费在线| 玩弄中年熟妇正在播放| 久热免费在线观看| 少妇网站在线观看| 自拍偷拍视频在线| 久久久久久免费看| 日本三区在线观看| 在线观看中文av| 国产毛片久久久久久国产毛片| 国产精品333| 69久久久久久| 99久热在线精品视频| 日本精品免费在线观看| 中文字幕第100页| 九一免费在线观看| 欧美一级片中文字幕 | 日韩欧美xxxx| 青青草久久伊人| 久久亚洲国产成人精品无码区| 久久精品国产精品亚洲色婷婷| 一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 五月天av影院| 欧美精品99久久| av中文字幕网址| 97成人在线免费视频| 91小视频在线播放| 免费看黄在线看| 五月天视频在线观看| 日韩一级片免费视频| www.com黄色片| 9色porny| 亚洲欧美日本一区二区三区| 99re6这里有精品热视频| 99色精品视频| 欧美另类videos| 国产wwwxx| 又大又硬又爽免费视频| 小泽玛利亚视频在线观看| 老子影院午夜伦不卡大全| 9久久婷婷国产综合精品性色| 青青视频免费在线观看| 色综合天天色综合| 九一国产精品视频| 91香蕉视频网址| 九九热免费精品视频| 久操网在线观看| 91精品国产三级| 不卡av免费在线| 成人黄色av片| 超碰10000| 国产精欧美一区二区三区白种人| 欧美 日本 亚洲| 天天做天天爱天天高潮| 天天爽人人爽夜夜爽| 国产成人精品视频免费看| 99久热在线精品视频| 国产探花在线观看视频| 看欧美ab黄色大片视频免费 | 色天使在线观看| 久草精品在线播放| 国产美女主播在线播放| 国产又粗又大又爽的视频| 天堂av在线8| 欧美黄色性生活| 国产一区亚洲二区三区| 久久久久久久中文| 欧美一级片免费播放| 青青草免费在线视频观看| 久久久久久久久久毛片| 黄色在线视频网| 可以在线看的黄色网址| 欧美 日韩精品| 青青青免费在线| 欧美一级片免费播放| 国产精品视频网站在线观看| 久久av秘一区二区三区| 激情在线观看视频| 午夜免费看毛片| 日韩av卡一卡二| 一路向西2在线观看| 杨幂毛片午夜性生毛片| 亚洲黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲精品怡红院| 成人性做爰aaa片免费看不忠| 欧美性大战久久久久xxx| 欧美在线观看www| 精品这里只有精品| 日韩av三级在线| 北条麻妃69av| 国产黄色一级网站| 久久综合久久色| 免费涩涩18网站入口| 日本中文字幕观看| 日日夜夜精品视频免费观看| 欧美日韩视频免费在线观看| 久久综合在线观看| 免费在线观看污污视频| 在线观看17c| 蜜臀av无码一区二区三区| xxxx18hd亚洲hd捆绑| 中国丰满人妻videoshd| 99久久激情视频| 亚洲免费av一区| 国产精品久久成人免费观看| 欧美少妇一区二区三区| 大胆欧美熟妇xx| 日韩精品视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品亚洲a| 成人综合久久网| 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃百度| 日韩视频免费播放| 国产天堂在线播放| 亚洲一级片av| 精品无码av无码免费专区| 国产一区二区在线视频播放| 精品www久久久久奶水| 性猛交ⅹ×××乱大交| 欧美三级午夜理伦三级老人| 国产免费一区二区视频| 久久精品香蕉视频| 亚洲三级在线观看视频| 日本aa在线观看| 黄色a级片免费| 国产精品久久久久久久99| 夜夜添无码一区二区三区| 免费在线激情视频| 国产又粗又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美这里只有精品| 欧美精品99久久| 永久免费黄色片|