久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

It's time for Chinese business to turn on the lights

By Giles Chance (China Daily) Updated: 2012-10-19 17:37

It's time for Chinese business to turn on the lights

US intelligence committee report on Huawei, ZTE holds an important lesson

In February last year the Chinese telecommunications equipment maker Huawei wrote an open letter to the US government that complained of being unfairly excluded from the US market, and asked for a formal investigation into its business activities in the US. In response, in November the US government body responsible for overseeing national security and intelligence, the House Intelligence Committee, began investigating the suitability of Huawei and another big Chinese telecoms supplier, ZTE, as suppliers to national communications networks in the US. On Oct 8 the committee published a report on the US national security issues posed by Chinese telecommunication companies Huawei and ZTE.

It concluded that the US should "view with suspicion" the continued penetration of the US market by Chinese telecoms companies; that US network providers should seek other, non-Chinese, suppliers; that the US Congress should investigate the alleged unfair trade practices of Chinese telecoms companies; that Chinese companies should become more open and transparent; and that Congress should legislate to limit access to US communications systems by non-US companies that it determines should not be trusted to build critical infrastructure.

The report not only struck at Huawei and ZTE, respectively the second and fourth-largest telecoms equipment suppliers in the world, but also at their Western business partners, in the US and elsewhere.

Since both of these companies were founded 20 or 30 years ago they have become huge and successful, and have become deeply entwined in the fabric of global commerce and telecommunications. Huawei is a supplier to a number of Western telecoms operators such as British Telecom, and is also a large buyer of Western equipment for the telecoms systems that it builds worldwide.

One of Huawei's most important US partners, IBM, has worked closely with it and has used it as a supplier since 1997. The Boston Consulting Group, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Mercers and the Hay Group are some of the other big Western companies that have supported Huawei on its journey to becoming a global player.

It is not surprising, then, that the Financial Times writer John Gapper, writing on Oct 10 about the congressional committee's report in the London edition of the newspaper, should comment that it's "too late for America to eliminate Huawei".

In his opinion, the world in which each country aims to control its national communications systems by way of a national telecoms monopoly, such as AT&T in the US, British Telecom in Britain and France Telecom in France, no longer exists.

His inference is widely shared: that in our globalized world, the West should welcome competitors from emerging economies, in particular from the largest, China, which only re-entered the global economic system a couple of decades ago.

Gapper argues that the complaints made in the committee's report about breach of patents and soft-loan support by Huawei and ZTE to win contracts should not strike at the heart of Sino-US trade relations, but instead should be matters for national arbitration by the World Trade Organization and intellectual property lawyers.

Certainly, the committee's report does not hold back in its comments about the threat that it perceives from these two flagships of Chinese business abroad. It says "China has the means, opportunity and motive to use telecommunication companies for malicious purposes" and that "it appears that under Chinese law ZTE and Huawei would be obligated to cooperate with any request by the Chinese government to use their systems or access them for malicious purposes under the guise of state security".

The report complains of the lack of information ZTE and Huawei provided in response to the committee's repeated requests. It says it was particularly concerned that it had not received enough information from either of the two about their relations with the Chinese government and about the role of the Communist Party office within their organizations.

Huawei, in particular it said, did not completely clarify to the committee its corporate structure, history, ownership, operations, management or financial arrangements.

Many would agree with the view Gapper expressed that this dispute should not strike at Sino-US trade relations, but is something to be ironed out by both sides by reference to international bodies such as the WTO and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and experts on international law. Perhaps, too, the US should employ security-cleared private intermediaries to vet the work done by the Chinese, as the British government does when it awards contracts to Chinese telecom equipment companies.

But the US government is no different to any national government in owing a duty of care to its people to protect and maintain national security. Whether or not China is the demon portrayed by the committee's report, isn't the committee entitled to demand a heavy burden of proof from Huawei and ZTE to permit the Chinese companies to supply equipment to its national communication networks? Is it unreasonable for the US to expect complete disclosure from foreign companies that help build communications networks in the US?

Why did Huawei and ZTE not provide much of the information that the committee requested? And following completion of the investigation, why does the committee still not comprehend the role of the Communist Party within Huawei?

Despite Huawei's comments that the committee's report is "a monstrous, market-distorting, trade-distorting policy precedent that could be used in other markets against American companies", it is ZTE and Huawei, and behind them the Chinese business system, that must carry much of the blame for the negative (for them) outcome of the committee's investigation.

Given China's evolution into a global economy, it was only a question of time before its companies became deeply intertwined with Western economies and societies, as Huawei and ZTE have done. Continued economic and social integration between China and the rest of the world is inevitable, as long as China and the West, led by the US, wish to continue peaceful co-development. But the committee's report demonstrates that China's global integration cannot flourish without a significant upgrading in the way that Chinese companies operate in terms of openness and transparency.

The congressional report on Huawei and ZTE is an important milestone in China's journey to the outside world, a journey that started at the end of the "cultural revolution" (1966-76). The commentators from both East and West who blame the US intelligence committee for taking a short-sighted and protectionist approach to Huawei and ZTE are missing an essential point: namely, that China cannot achieve its full economic potential and become a full-fledged world citizen without subscribing and submitting to the values of fairness, openness and transparency accepted by the global community.

The author is a visiting professor at Guanghua School of Management, Peking University. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily. Contact the writer at gileschance@yahoo.com

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
久久久无码人妻精品无码_6080YYY午夜理论片中无码_性无码专区_无码人妻品一区二区三区精99

    亚洲精品20p| 99久久久无码国产精品性色戒| 欧美一级视频在线| 国产又粗又猛又爽又黄的网站| 日本黄色三级大片| 日本不卡一区二区三区四区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级乱| 手机在线免费毛片| 草草草在线视频| 日韩一区二区高清视频| 污污动漫在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲国产精品影视| 538在线视频观看| 野外做受又硬又粗又大视频√| 亚洲精品自拍网| 大肉大捧一进一出好爽视频| 国产资源第一页| 爱爱爱爱免费视频| 日韩毛片在线免费看| 一本久道高清无码视频| 久久精品一卡二卡| 日日噜噜夜夜狠狠| 男人揉女人奶房视频60分| 欧美国产综合在线| 国产精品无码乱伦| 亚洲无在线观看| 欧美性猛交xxx乱久交| 国产在线精品91| 高清无码视频直接看| 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品色| 丁香婷婷激情网| 欧美一级黄色片视频| 欧美啪啪免费视频| 欧美久久在线观看| 女人床在线观看| 日韩视频在线观看视频| 中文字幕久久av| 中文字幕亚洲欧洲| 中文字幕第88页| 亚洲黄色av网址| 青青在线视频免费| 麻豆av免费在线| 狠狠爱免费视频| 99999精品视频| 很污的网站在线观看| 99热这里只有精品免费| 四虎4hu永久免费入口| 黄色a级在线观看| www.桃色.com| 日本黄色a视频| 黄瓜视频免费观看在线观看www | 国产精品夜夜夜爽张柏芝| 91在线第一页| 99re99热| 永久免费看av| 天堂8在线天堂资源bt| a天堂资源在线观看| 男女猛烈激情xx00免费视频| 三上悠亚久久精品| 女性隐私黄www网站视频| 91在线视频观看免费| 99视频在线视频| 日韩在线一区视频| 欧洲美女和动交zoz0z| 乱熟女高潮一区二区在线| 国产xxxx振车| 成年人黄色在线观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四在线播放| 日本a级片在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽欧美一区 | 妺妺窝人体色www看人体| 精品无码国产一区二区三区av| 妺妺窝人体色777777| 波多野结衣家庭教师在线| 久久精品99国产| 亚洲一级免费观看| 亚洲成人手机在线观看| 国产一区二区三区播放| 成年人午夜免费视频| 人妻有码中文字幕| 第四色婷婷基地| 日本美女爱爱视频| 1024av视频| 日韩av.com| 成人av在线播放观看| 国产裸体舞一区二区三区| 999这里有精品| 欧美中文字幕在线观看视频 | 国产三级精品三级在线| 久久免费一级片| 国产又黄又大又粗视频| 中文字幕成人在线视频| 日本男女交配视频| 欧美视频免费播放| 久久精品久久99| 国产精彩视频一区二区| 天天干天天玩天天操| 台湾无码一区二区| 99视频在线视频| 日本一级黄视频| 免费看国产黄色片| 国产成人永久免费视频| 欧美婷婷精品激情| 国产成人永久免费视频| av在线网址导航| 无码中文字幕色专区| 超碰在线资源站| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区96| 黄色一级片网址| 国产视频一区二区视频| 国产aaa免费视频| 日本高清一区二区视频| 69堂免费视频| 4444在线观看| 亚洲va综合va国产va中文| aa视频在线播放| 日本特级黄色大片| 91看片就是不一样| 国产日本在线播放| 波多野结衣免费观看| mm1313亚洲国产精品无码试看| 欧美性猛交内射兽交老熟妇| 99国产精品久久久久久| 欧美成人精品欧美一级乱| 久久亚洲国产成人精品无码区 | 日韩在线观看a| 国产一区二区在线观看免费视频| 日韩在线综合网| 国产欧美123| 免费成年人高清视频| 91淫黄看大片| 两根大肉大捧一进一出好爽视频| 国产资源第一页| 爱爱爱视频网站| 成人综合久久网| 美女黄色片视频| 国内外成人免费激情视频| 免费在线看黄色片| 久久99国产精品一区| 欧美激情国内自拍| 亚洲va在线va天堂va偷拍| 成人午夜激情av| 成人性做爰aaa片免费看不忠| 日本a在线免费观看| a天堂资源在线观看| 经典三级在线视频| 国产欧美综合一区| 国产精品无码乱伦| 天堂av免费看| 中文字幕一区二区三区四区五区人| 午夜精品久久久久久久99热影院| 天天操天天爱天天爽| 97公开免费视频| 天天操天天爽天天射| 日本新janpanese乱熟| 成人性做爰aaa片免费看不忠| 国产成人综合一区| 国产成人手机视频| www.com操| 中文字幕成人在线视频| 中文字幕久久av| 亚洲网中文字幕| 日本久久高清视频| 99热一区二区三区| 嫩草影院中文字幕| 青青草精品视频在线| 69堂免费视频| 精品久久久久久久无码 | 欧美 国产 精品| 男人草女人视频| 国产一区二区片| 男女激情无遮挡| 欧美日韩激情视频在线观看| 99久久久无码国产精品6| 丰满少妇在线观看| www.久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲一区二区图片| 黄色一级片国产| av动漫在线看| 在线视频日韩一区| 手机在线国产视频| 国产一级片91| 国产女大学生av| 邪恶网站在线观看| 午夜xxxxx| 97在线国产视频| www.亚洲天堂网| 久久久精品高清| 国产一级大片免费看| 国产成人精品视频免费看| 另类小说第一页| 蜜桃视频成人在线观看| 日韩精品 欧美| 三上悠亚在线一区二区| 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa在线看片| 日本韩国欧美在线观看| www.激情小说.com| 台湾无码一区二区| 成人精品视频一区二区|