US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Opinion

    How real is the tax burden

    By Jia Kang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-03-04 08:22

    The debate on the tax burden is growing among Chinese as they become more conscious about being taxpayers. A recent Chinese Academy of Social Sciences report has added vigor to that debate by saying that "the per capita tax burden in China is nearly 10,000 yuan ($1,633)".

    Perhaps taxpayers' misconception about "per capita tax burden" is to blame for the renewed debate. "Per capita tax burden" is the same as "average fiscal revenue". Academics and government officials are known to use the concept of "macro tax burden", which takes into account the ratio of total government revenue in a country's GDP. But the concept of "per capita tax burden" is relatively new to us.

    How real is the tax burden

    How real is the tax burden

     
    The difference in the expressions of "per capita tax burden" and "average fiscal revenue" can be significant. Although the two terms refer to the same thing economically, people could derive different meanings from them. If we quantify the tax burden to every single citizen, people will dislike it. But they will be more than happy to accept an increase in average fiscal revenue.

    The "macro tax burden" index can be more meaningful while measuring a country's tax burden, because the ratio of fiscal revenue accounting for GDP can better reflect the concentration ratio of government financial resources in a specific economic structure, and manifest certain fiscal and taxation systems. It also can analyze the characteristics of an economy's financial allocation and the government's role in controlling its resources for administration.

    If we compare this index with the international level, going by the International Monetary Fund's standards, China's current ratio is less than 35 percent, which is the average of developing countries but much lower than that of advanced economies. This means China's macro tax burden is not that high and there is little sense in introducing a "per capita tax" index by quantifying the macro tax burden to individuals. For one thing, it can easily cause misunderstandings among the public. In China, less than 10 percent of the government's total tax comes directly from individuals, with companies paying more than 90 percent. This is because the tax system is aimed at redistributing social wealth from better-off groups to the poorer ones.

    A deeper analysis of the tax burden, however, will show that not all the amount companies pay as taxes comes from their own pockets. Except for the corporate income tax, companies pass on the other taxes such as value-added tax and business tax to parties down the supply/delivery chain or ultimately to consumers. Such a tax is called "indirect tax". In China, indirect tax makes up the main part of the tax system, and it is the key to understanding the tax burden issue.

    Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    ...
    一本色道无码不卡在线观看| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 亚洲 欧美 中文 在线 视频| 亚洲精品无码不卡在线播放HE | 伊人久久综合精品无码AV专区 | 日韩欧美中文在线| 国产无遮挡无码视频免费软件| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 无码AV中文一区二区三区| 国产综合无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码绿巨人| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 最新中文字幕AV无码不卡| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲AV人无码综合在线观看| 狠狠躁天天躁中文字幕无码 | 无码国产精品一区二区免费虚拟VR| 久久中文字幕精品| 免费无码AV一区二区| 狠狠躁夜夜躁无码中文字幕| 亚洲ⅴ国产v天堂a无码二区| 亚洲一区精品无码| 亚洲国产精品无码一线岛国| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 国产成人无码免费看视频软件 | 欧美一级一区二区中文字幕| 国产区精品一区二区不卡中文| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码二区| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99不卡| 国产免费无码AV片在线观看不卡| 无码内射中文字幕岛国片| 亚洲AV无码日韩AV无码导航| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区中| 性无码专区无码片| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区99 | 无码AⅤ精品一区二区三区| 18禁无遮拦无码国产在线播放| 国产成人无码综合亚洲日韩| AV无码久久久久不卡网站下载 | 亚洲欧美综合在线中文| 日韩精品人妻一区二区中文八零|