US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Opinion

    Not the right move to curb pollution

    By MARIE (China Daily) Updated: 2014-04-22 07:21

    Comment on "Pollution discharge fees to rise dramatically" (China Daily, April 16)

    I don't agree with the method of collecting pollution discharge fee to deal with the environmental problem. Why should the money collected be called "fee" rather than "fine"? Is the fee a penalty that factories polluting and endangering our environment have to pay? Or, is it an amount polluters need to pay to continue polluting our air, water and soil as they wish, without any punishment?

    It's also ridiculous to hear that it's a "commercial way" of checking pollution - the simplistic assumption being that enterprises may stop polluting when they can't afford to pay the discharge fee. If so, why have the environmental authorities set a maximum ceiling for the discharge fee?

    Does it mean that if the enterprises are rich enough to pay the maximum fee, they can pollute our air, water and soil as much as possible and nobody can stop them? It seems more like a measure to allow local environmental authorities to collect money than a move to curb pollution.

    I also don't like the idea of managing the environment after allowing enterprises (and other entities) to pollute it. It's understandable that local authorities are under great pressure to maintain or increase local economies' GDP growth and create more jobs, which they cannot do if they immediately shut down the polluting plants and factories.

    But we shouldn't focus on short-term interests at the cost of long-term social well-being. How much will it cost in the future to clean the environment that we pollute today? I'm sure it will cost much, much more than the money that environmental protection authorities collect today.

    That is why I suggest the authorities change their mind and method to reduce pollution as soon as possible.

    MARIE, via e-mail

    Readers' comments are welcome. Please send your e-mail to opinion@chinadaily.com.cn or letters@chinadaily.com.cn or to the individual columnists. China Daily reserves the right to edit all letters. Thank you.

    Not the right move to curb pollution Not the right move to curb pollution
    Top 10 cities with worst smog in China

    Smoggy memories

     

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    ...
    亚洲一区精品无码| yy111111少妇无码影院| 东京热加勒比无码少妇| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 国产成人无码18禁午夜福利p| 熟妇人妻系列aⅴ无码专区友真希| 亚洲无码视频在线| 国产Av激情久久无码天堂| 老子午夜精品无码| 日本一区二区三区精品中文字幕 | 亚洲日韩中文无码久久| 国产在线拍揄自揄拍无码| 婷婷四虎东京热无码群交双飞视频| 天堂а√在线中文在线最新版| av无码久久久久久不卡网站| 亚洲AV中文无码乱人伦下载| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区四区| 台湾佬中文娱乐中文| 在线欧美中文字幕农村电影| 人妻系列无码专区久久五月天| 无码AV天堂一区二区三区| 亚洲va无码专区国产乱码| 精品亚洲AV无码一区二区三区| 亚洲福利中文字幕在线网址| 国产一区二区中文字幕| 人妻无码人妻有码中文字幕| 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 久久精品无码一区二区日韩AV| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安| 无码AV波多野结衣久久| 无码国产色欲XXXXX视频| 亚洲av永久无码精品表情包| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区性色 | 欧美日韩亚洲中文字幕二区 | 欧美日韩国产中文字幕| 亚洲乱码中文字幕综合| 中文人妻无码一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看精品中文| 人妻中文字系列无码专区| 日本中文字幕电影| 乱人伦中文无码视频在线观看|