US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
    Business / Opinion

    Not the right move to curb pollution

    By MARIE (China Daily) Updated: 2014-04-22 07:21

    Comment on "Pollution discharge fees to rise dramatically" (China Daily, April 16)

    I don't agree with the method of collecting pollution discharge fee to deal with the environmental problem. Why should the money collected be called "fee" rather than "fine"? Is the fee a penalty that factories polluting and endangering our environment have to pay? Or, is it an amount polluters need to pay to continue polluting our air, water and soil as they wish, without any punishment?

    It's also ridiculous to hear that it's a "commercial way" of checking pollution - the simplistic assumption being that enterprises may stop polluting when they can't afford to pay the discharge fee. If so, why have the environmental authorities set a maximum ceiling for the discharge fee?

    Does it mean that if the enterprises are rich enough to pay the maximum fee, they can pollute our air, water and soil as much as possible and nobody can stop them? It seems more like a measure to allow local environmental authorities to collect money than a move to curb pollution.

    I also don't like the idea of managing the environment after allowing enterprises (and other entities) to pollute it. It's understandable that local authorities are under great pressure to maintain or increase local economies' GDP growth and create more jobs, which they cannot do if they immediately shut down the polluting plants and factories.

    But we shouldn't focus on short-term interests at the cost of long-term social well-being. How much will it cost in the future to clean the environment that we pollute today? I'm sure it will cost much, much more than the money that environmental protection authorities collect today.

    That is why I suggest the authorities change their mind and method to reduce pollution as soon as possible.

    MARIE, via e-mail

    Readers' comments are welcome. Please send your e-mail to opinion@chinadaily.com.cn or letters@chinadaily.com.cn or to the individual columnists. China Daily reserves the right to edit all letters. Thank you.

    Not the right move to curb pollution Not the right move to curb pollution
    Top 10 cities with worst smog in China

    Smoggy memories

     

    Hot Topics

    Editor's Picks
    ...
    ...
    亚洲伊人久久综合中文成人网 | 精品欧洲av无码一区二区| 少妇中文无码高清| 亚洲AV无码一区东京热久久| 中文字幕在线精品视频入口一区 | 国产成人精品无码一区二区| 国产台湾无码AV片在线观看| 一区二区三区无码高清| 久久久无码一区二区三区| 日韩av无码中文无码电影| 久久久久久久久久久久中文字幕 | 合区精品中文字幕| 人妻丝袜中文无码av影音先锋专区| 国产乱子伦精品无码码专区 | 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影| 日韩欧美成人免费中文字幕| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕一区二区| 久久精品无码一区二区三区日韩 | 亚洲av无码一区二区乱子伦as| 亚洲成a人片在线观看中文动漫| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看野外| 日韩AV无码久久一区二区| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看富二代| 中文精品久久久久人妻| 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕综合| 色综合天天综合中文网| 亚洲综合日韩中文字幕v在线| 亚洲av无码专区在线观看下载| 99无码熟妇丰满人妻啪啪| 人妻aⅴ无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码一区二区乱孑伦AS| 亚洲日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 精品无码免费专区毛片| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕毛片| 伊人久久无码中文字幕| 亚洲人成无码网站| 少妇人妻无码专区视频| av大片在线无码免费| 国产精品无码免费播放| 蜜臀av无码人妻精品|