Housing vote in Beijing 'not supported'

    By Liu Weifeng (China Daily)
    Updated: 2007-06-19 06:57

    The first-ever referendum on the demolition of old houses has not been met with favor by a majority of the general public.

    About 62.7 percent of 1,506 people in a week-long survey starting on June 10, were not happy with the way the referendum was conducted.

    Respondents disagreed with the method of voting to decide the future of the capital city's largest-ever urban renewal project.

    They feared rights of the minority were not taken into account.

    "Real democracy means not neglecting the minority," most respondents said.

    The survey was jointly conducted by the social survey center of China Youth Daily and Tencent, a website.

    Jiuxianqiao sub-district, the focus of the referendum, involved about 20,000 people living in an area of 420,000 sq m. Of those surveyed, 84.4 per cent said they were interested in the urban renewal project for the area because of its size, and the results of the referendum.

    "People's interest was aroused because of the adoption of a new method of voting," China Youth Daily was quoted as saying.

    Positive comments were received through the media over the democratic system of the vote designed to safeguard the rights of the majority of the people involved, it said.

    In the survey, 31.1 percent praised the referendum as a pilot approach, which took account of public opinion in the decision-making process; 34.7 percent believed the vote respected the opinion of the majority and was worth promoting in similar situations in other cities.

    A total of 37.3 percent agreed with the voting-oriented approach while 62.7 percent disagreed.

    The referendum on June 9 showed that 2,451 families accepted the compensation on offer, while 1,228 families disagreed.

    However, the referendum only covered 67 per cent of 5,473 households in the sub-district.

    The survey showed 54 per cent believed the referendum was a democratic framework only in name.

    Yang Ping, a visiting scholar of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, told China Daily majority rule in democratic policies has long been accused of "tyranny over the minority".

    "Compared with 'tyranny by the minority', majority rule has obvious advantages and contains more scientific and democratic elements," Yang said.

    "The key element of majority rule in China is to guarantee the vote is conducted fairly and openly; otherwise the authority and credibility of majority rule could be challenged," she said.

    (China Daily 06/19/2007 page4)



    Top China News  
    Today's Top News  
    Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
    人妻无码久久一区二区三区免费| 中文字幕手机在线观看| 再看日本中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲日韩精品A∨片无码| 777久久精品一区二区三区无码 | 亚洲欧洲精品无码AV| 欧美中文字幕在线| 亚洲免费日韩无码系列| 精品无码人妻一区二区免费蜜桃 | 亚洲国产精品无码成人片久久| 日韩精品无码一区二区中文字幕| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线| 2014AV天堂无码一区| 亚洲美日韩Av中文字幕无码久久久妻妇| 最好的中文字幕视频2019 | 最近中文字幕大全免费版在线| yy111111少妇影院里无码| 无码一区二区三区视频| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码老牛影视| 亚洲成A人片在线观看中文| 中文字幕一区一区三区| 天堂在线中文字幕| 波多野结衣中文在线| 天堂资源中文最新版在线一区| 国色天香中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲av无码天堂一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久无码中文野结衣| 国精品无码一区二区三区左线| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区99仓本 | 97无码免费人妻超| 国产成人无码专区| 久久精品无码一区二区三区免费 | 在线看中文福利影院| 天堂亚洲国产中文在线| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 天堂资源中文最新版在线一区| 日本中文字幕免费高清视频| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕 | 免费无码成人AV在线播放不卡 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文播放| 中文成人无字幕乱码精品区|